PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
top_groth
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


ZBRA 20.00%LII 20.00%BURL 20.00%MANH 20.00%PSTG 20.00%EquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in top_groth, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Oct 7, 2015, corresponding to the inception date of PSTG

Returns By Period

As of Apr 3, 2026, the top_groth returned -7.57% Year-To-Date and 18.12% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.11%-3.43%-3.84%-1.98%16.08%16.86%10.37%12.29%
Portfolio
top_groth
-0.48%-5.35%-7.57%-17.76%-2.49%13.97%7.42%18.12%
ZBRA
Zebra Technologies Corporation
-2.14%-10.00%-16.47%-31.44%-29.47%-13.34%-16.23%11.76%
LII
Lennox International Inc.
-2.19%-17.44%-6.10%-16.36%-19.87%23.71%8.79%14.09%
BURL
Burlington Stores, Inc.
-0.63%9.44%13.81%28.54%28.87%16.87%1.89%19.12%
MANH
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
0.19%-9.24%-22.36%-33.17%-24.78%-4.94%2.16%9.13%
PSTG
Pure Storage, Inc.
2.31%1.20%-6.76%-29.20%35.80%34.78%23.25%15.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Oct 8, 2015, top_groth's average daily return is +0.08%, while the average monthly return is +1.58%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 3.7 years.

Historically, 57% of months were positive and 43% were negative. The best month was Apr 2020 with a return of +20.3%, while the worst month was Mar 2020 at -21.2%. The longest winning streak lasted 6 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 5 months.

On a daily basis, top_groth closed higher 53% of trading days. The best single day was Apr 9, 2025 with a return of +13.4%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -17.4%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
2026-1.58%-0.45%-6.19%0.56%-7.57%
2025-2.85%-13.84%-8.10%-2.92%8.90%4.50%9.58%3.98%-3.67%0.05%-5.89%-4.19%-15.85%
20241.27%14.19%4.02%-8.82%12.61%4.71%5.67%-1.33%2.80%-1.97%8.98%-0.36%47.55%
202312.23%-1.19%-0.33%-1.11%0.36%15.76%5.08%-2.45%-6.99%-5.91%14.88%8.83%42.43%
2022-15.65%-6.37%3.52%-7.89%-11.14%-6.69%14.91%-2.78%-9.90%9.10%9.60%-3.25%-27.28%
20211.31%8.84%1.97%5.52%-0.20%3.16%2.46%6.06%-7.55%5.77%3.65%2.21%37.49%

Benchmark Metrics

top_groth has an annualized alpha of 3.93%, beta of 1.23, and R² of 0.63 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since October 08, 2015.

  • This portfolio captured 139.97% of S&P 500 Index gains and 118.29% of its losses — amplifying both gains and losses, but participating more in upside than downside.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 3.93% versus S&P 500 Index — delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.

Alpha
3.93%
Beta
1.23
0.63
Upside Capture
139.97%
Downside Capture
118.29%

Expense Ratio

top_groth has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


The portfolio doesn't include any funds that charge management fees.

Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

top_groth ranks 5 for risk / return — in the bottom 5% of portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.


top_groth Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
top_groth Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
top_groth Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
top_groth Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
top_groth Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
top_groth Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.08

0.88

-0.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.13

1.37

-1.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.21

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.00

1.39

-1.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.01

6.43

-6.45


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
ZBRA
Zebra Technologies Corporation
14-0.62-0.650.91-0.68-1.36
LII
Lennox International Inc.
19-0.56-0.600.93-0.55-1.01
BURL
Burlington Stores, Inc.
650.711.211.161.814.09
MANH
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
17-0.62-0.710.91-0.52-1.11
PSTG
Pure Storage, Inc.
590.541.191.180.892.01

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

top_groth Sharpe ratios as of Apr 3, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: -0.08
  • 5-Year: 0.26
  • 10-Year: 0.65
  • All Time: 0.62

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 0.98 to 1.66, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio places it in the bottom 25%. This suggests weaker risk-adjusted returns than most portfolios, possibly due to lower returns, higher volatility, or both. It may be worth reviewing the allocation. You can use the Portfolio Optimization tool to explore options for improving the Sharpe ratio.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of top_groth compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

top_groth provided a 0.28% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio0.28%0.21%0.15%0.19%0.34%0.22%0.22%0.24%0.22%0.19%0.22%0.22%
ZBRA
Zebra Technologies Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LII
Lennox International Inc.
1.40%1.04%0.75%0.97%1.71%1.09%1.12%1.21%1.11%0.94%1.08%1.10%
BURL
Burlington Stores, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MANH
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PSTG
Pure Storage, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the top_groth. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the top_groth was 42.36%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 56 trading sessions.

The current top_groth drawdown is 28.51%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-42.36%Jan 24, 202038Mar 18, 202056Jun 8, 202094
-40.43%Dec 28, 2021202Oct 14, 2022293Dec 14, 2023495
-39.32%Jan 24, 202552Apr 8, 2025
-24.44%Sep 14, 201870Dec 24, 201859Mar 21, 2019129
-22.68%Nov 9, 201563Feb 9, 2016126Aug 9, 2016189

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 5 assets, with an effective number of assets of 5.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkBURLPSTGLIIMANHZBRAPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.450.560.560.610.640.75
BURL0.451.000.280.340.350.370.62
PSTG0.560.281.000.340.410.440.71
LII0.560.340.341.000.430.460.64
MANH0.610.350.410.431.000.480.70
ZBRA0.640.370.440.460.481.000.75
Portfolio0.750.620.710.640.700.751.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Oct 8, 2015