Asset Allocation
| Position | Category/Sector | Target Weight |
|---|---|---|
MSTR MicroStrategy Incorporated | Technology | 100% |
Performance
Performance Chart
The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Doofus, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.
Loading graphics...
The earliest data available for this chart is Jun 11, 1998, corresponding to the inception date of MSTR
Returns By Period
As of Apr 3, 2026, the Doofus returned -21.14% Year-To-Date and 20.56% of annualized return in the last 10 years.
| 1D | 1M | YTD | 6M | 1Y | 3Y* | 5Y* | 10Y* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark S&P 500 Index | 0.11% | -3.43% | -3.84% | -1.98% | 16.08% | 16.86% | 10.37% | 12.29% |
Portfolio Doofus | -2.40% | -9.68% | -21.14% | -65.99% | -61.66% | 59.13% | 11.24% | 20.56% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||
MSTR MicroStrategy Incorporated | -2.40% | -9.68% | -21.14% | -65.99% | -61.66% | 59.13% | 11.24% | 20.56% |
Monthly Returns
Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Jun 12, 1998, Doofus's average daily return is +0.15%, while the average monthly return is +3.54%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 1.7 years.
Historically, 51% of months were positive and 49% were negative. The best month was Oct 2001 with a return of +143.4%, while the worst month was Apr 2000 at -70.3%. The longest winning streak lasted 9 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 10 months.
On a daily basis, Doofus closed higher 50% of trading days. The best single day was Apr 19, 2001 with a return of +76.4%, while the worst single day was Mar 20, 2000 at -61.7%.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -1.47% | -13.50% | -3.63% | -3.98% | -21.14% | ||||||||
| 2025 | 15.60% | -23.70% | 12.86% | 31.86% | -2.91% | 9.53% | -0.59% | -16.78% | -3.65% | -16.36% | -34.26% | -14.24% | -47.53% |
| 2024 | -20.65% | 104.07% | 66.65% | -37.52% | 43.14% | -9.64% | 17.20% | -17.98% | 27.32% | 45.02% | 58.47% | -25.25% | 358.54% |
| 2023 | 77.81% | 4.19% | 11.46% | 12.34% | -8.15% | 13.52% | 27.88% | -18.35% | -8.18% | 28.97% | 17.69% | 26.75% | 346.15% |
| 2022 | -32.41% | 20.38% | 9.78% | -27.17% | -25.26% | -37.93% | 74.11% | -19.05% | -8.33% | 26.03% | -25.95% | -28.53% | -74.00% |
| 2021 | 58.88% | 21.56% | -9.54% | -3.19% | -28.48% | 41.38% | -5.79% | 10.91% | -16.69% | 23.63% | 0.89% | -24.53% | 40.13% |
Benchmark Metrics
Doofus has an annualized alpha of 28.74%, beta of 1.40, and R² of 0.13 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since June 12, 1998.
- This portfolio captured 277.12% of S&P 500 Index gains and 182.88% of its losses — amplifying both gains and losses, but participating more in upside than downside.
- R² of 0.13 means this portfolio moves largely independently of S&P 500 Index — capture ratios reflect limited market correlation rather than active downside protection. Consider using a more representative benchmark.
- Alpha
- 28.74%
- Beta
- 1.40
- R²
- 0.13
- Upside Capture
- 277.12%
- Downside Capture
- 182.88%
Expense Ratio
Doofus has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.
Return for Risk
Risk / Return Rank
Doofus ranks 1 for risk / return — in the bottom 1% of portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.
Return / Risk — by metrics
| Portfolio | Benchmark | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.84 | 0.88 | -1.72 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.36 | 1.37 | -2.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.21 | -0.36 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | 1.39 | -2.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.37 | 6.43 | -7.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.
| Risk / Return Rank | Sharpe ratio | Sortino ratio | Omega ratio | Calmar ratio | Martin ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSTR MicroStrategy Incorporated | 9 | -0.84 | -1.36 | 0.85 | -0.80 | -1.37 |
Loading graphics...
Dividends
Dividend yield
Drawdowns
Drawdowns Chart
The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.
Loading graphics...
Worst Drawdowns
The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Doofus. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.
The maximum drawdown for the Doofus was 99.86%, occurring on Jul 26, 2002. Recovery took 5612 trading sessions.
The current Doofus drawdown is 74.71%.
Depth | Start | To Bottom | Bottom | To Recover | End | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -99.86% | Mar 13, 2000 | 595 | Jul 26, 2002 | 5612 | Nov 11, 2024 | 6207 |
| -77.42% | Nov 21, 2024 | 301 | Feb 5, 2026 | — | — | — |
| -65.17% | Aug 26, 1998 | 162 | Apr 19, 1999 | 110 | Sep 23, 1999 | 272 |
| -29.1% | Dec 13, 1999 | 10 | Dec 27, 1999 | 10 | Jan 10, 2000 | 20 |
| -20.42% | Feb 17, 2000 | 8 | Feb 29, 2000 | 1 | Mar 1, 2000 | 9 |
Volatility
Volatility Chart
The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Diversification
Diversification Metrics
Number of Effective Assets
The portfolio contains 1 assets, with an effective number of assets of 1.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.
Asset Correlations Table
| Benchmark | MSTR | Portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | 1.00 | 0.46 | 0.46 |
| MSTR | 0.46 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Portfolio | 0.46 | 1.00 | 1.00 |