PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
Large cap value/blend comparison
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Large cap value/blend comparison, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Sep 3, 2019, corresponding to the inception date of AFVLX

Returns By Period


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.11%-3.43%-3.84%-1.98%16.08%16.86%10.37%12.29%
Portfolio
Large cap value/blend comparison
0.42%-3.29%-1.85%-0.39%11.30%13.37%8.62%
AFVLX
Applied Finance Select Fund
0.39%-3.61%-1.76%-1.47%11.45%11.02%7.48%
OAKMX
Oakmark Fund Investor Class
-0.35%-3.34%-2.81%2.17%8.85%15.94%10.90%13.47%
PARWX
Parnassus Endeavor Fund
0.93%-3.63%-0.65%3.62%19.92%14.09%7.43%13.66%
QRVLX
FPA Queens Road Value Fund
0.71%-2.58%-2.18%-5.80%5.22%12.28%8.45%10.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Sep 4, 2019, Large cap value/blend comparison's average daily return is +0.06%, while the average monthly return is +1.17%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 5.0 years.

Historically, 63% of months were positive and 38% were negative. The best month was Nov 2020 with a return of +15.5%, while the worst month was Mar 2020 at -17.0%. The longest winning streak lasted 7 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 3 months.

On a daily basis, Large cap value/blend comparison closed higher 54% of trading days. The best single day was Mar 24, 2020 with a return of +11.0%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -12.5%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20261.97%0.72%-4.84%0.42%-1.85%
20254.12%-0.81%-4.21%-2.93%4.33%5.26%0.61%2.20%2.15%-0.25%1.35%0.99%13.09%
20241.22%3.86%5.19%-4.32%1.70%-0.37%4.34%1.22%1.61%-1.68%6.16%-5.50%13.47%
20237.28%-2.45%-0.95%0.80%-2.30%7.25%3.92%-1.72%-4.64%-2.81%9.33%5.85%19.93%
2022-2.69%-2.53%1.27%-6.89%1.72%-9.25%7.07%-2.79%-8.46%11.22%6.04%-4.80%-11.67%
2021-0.48%7.49%6.16%4.52%2.06%0.19%1.15%2.38%-3.73%4.75%-3.24%6.29%30.37%

Benchmark Metrics

Large cap value/blend comparison has an annualized alpha of 0.88%, beta of 0.96, and R² of 0.88 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since September 04, 2019.

  • With beta of 0.96 and R² of 0.88, this portfolio moves broadly in line with S&P 500 Index — much of its variation is explained by market exposure rather than independent behavior.

Alpha
0.88%
Beta
0.96
0.88
Upside Capture
98.69%
Downside Capture
97.71%

Expense Ratio

Large cap value/blend comparison has a high expense ratio of 0.98%, indicating above-average management fees. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

Large cap value/blend comparison ranks 15 for risk / return — in the bottom 15% of portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.


Large cap value/blend comparison Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
Large cap value/blend comparison Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
Large cap value/blend comparison Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
Large cap value/blend comparison Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
Large cap value/blend comparison Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
Large cap value/blend comparison Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.72

0.88

-0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.11

1.37

-0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.21

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.02

1.39

-0.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.19

6.43

-2.25


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
AFVLX
Applied Finance Select Fund
250.701.111.151.064.42
OAKMX
Oakmark Fund Investor Class
160.520.851.120.722.84
PARWX
Parnassus Endeavor Fund
601.201.741.261.767.70
QRVLX
FPA Queens Road Value Fund
110.370.641.090.641.86

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

Large cap value/blend comparison Sharpe ratios as of Apr 3, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 0.72
  • 5-Year: 0.54
  • All Time: 0.65

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 0.98 to 1.66, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio places it in the bottom 25%. This suggests weaker risk-adjusted returns than most portfolios, possibly due to lower returns, higher volatility, or both. It may be worth reviewing the allocation. You can use the Portfolio Optimization tool to explore options for improving the Sharpe ratio.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of Large cap value/blend comparison compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

Large cap value/blend comparison provided a 4.96% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio4.96%4.90%4.20%1.73%1.92%9.37%2.11%3.30%6.82%3.59%2.83%3.70%
AFVLX
Applied Finance Select Fund
3.80%3.74%3.80%1.18%1.02%2.11%1.09%0.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OAKMX
Oakmark Fund Investor Class
0.94%0.92%1.12%1.02%0.92%1.94%0.17%8.33%8.13%4.06%2.58%1.43%
PARWX
Parnassus Endeavor Fund
12.22%12.14%8.25%1.76%2.97%16.75%0.70%0.79%12.34%6.32%3.27%10.26%
QRVLX
FPA Queens Road Value Fund
2.88%2.81%3.64%2.95%2.77%16.71%6.49%3.40%6.82%3.99%5.48%3.12%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Large cap value/blend comparison. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the Large cap value/blend comparison was 37.43%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 161 trading sessions.

The current Large cap value/blend comparison drawdown is 5.73%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-37.43%Feb 13, 202027Mar 23, 2020161Nov 9, 2020188
-22.79%Nov 19, 2021217Sep 30, 2022300Dec 11, 2023517
-17.05%Dec 2, 202487Apr 8, 202557Jul 1, 2025144
-8.15%Feb 10, 202634Mar 30, 2026
-6.56%Sep 16, 201917Oct 8, 201914Oct 28, 201931

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 4 assets, with an effective number of assets of 4.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkOAKMXQRVLXPARWXAFVLXPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.820.850.880.900.90
OAKMX0.821.000.860.890.900.95
QRVLX0.850.861.000.870.900.94
PARWX0.880.890.871.000.910.96
AFVLX0.900.900.900.911.000.96
Portfolio0.900.950.940.960.961.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Sep 4, 2019