PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


MNST 35.00%ROK 30.00%PH 25.00%AFL 10.00%EquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in BO, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is never rebalanced.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Aug 18, 1995, corresponding to the inception date of MNST

Returns By Period

As of Apr 16, 2026, the BO returned -2.10% Year-To-Date and 13.45% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.80%4.83%2.59%5.27%30.14%19.29%10.91%12.94%
Portfolio
BO
-0.22%-2.54%-2.10%9.36%28.34%12.80%8.98%13.45%
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
-0.19%-2.75%-2.27%9.15%27.78%12.55%8.83%13.36%
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
-2.16%7.73%9.85%31.14%71.17%46.21%26.23%25.77%
ROK
Rockwell Automation, Inc.
-1.94%9.16%2.50%13.68%73.14%14.69%10.23%15.18%
AFL
Aflac Incorporated
0.93%3.55%3.00%3.97%6.85%22.14%18.84%15.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Aug 21, 1995, BO's average daily return is +0.13%, while the average monthly return is +2.60%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 2.3 years.

Historically, 60% of months were positive and 40% were negative. The best month was May 2004 with a return of +57.9%, while the worst month was Aug 2006 at -39.0%. The longest winning streak lasted 9 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 8 months.

On a daily basis, BO closed higher 52% of trading days. The best single day was Aug 15, 2014 with a return of +29.8%, while the worst single day was Aug 7, 2006 at -25.0%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20265.36%5.56%-14.96%3.51%-2.10%
2025-7.07%11.88%6.76%2.64%6.51%-1.92%-6.01%6.13%7.71%-0.65%12.14%2.20%45.62%
2024-4.56%7.48%0.36%-9.74%-2.84%-3.71%3.06%-8.12%10.49%0.93%4.78%-4.72%-8.34%
20232.61%-2.13%6.01%3.60%4.58%-1.74%0.14%-0.18%-7.74%-3.53%7.96%4.53%13.78%
2022-9.71%-2.73%-5.20%6.94%3.83%3.85%7.64%-10.76%-2.20%7.93%9.68%-1.31%5.36%
2021-6.04%1.07%3.90%6.44%-2.82%-2.99%3.28%3.43%-8.95%-4.12%-1.33%14.44%4.27%

Benchmark Metrics

BO has an annualized alpha of 27.37%, beta of 0.80, and R² of 0.16 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since August 21, 1995.

  • This portfolio captured 140.49% of S&P 500 Index gains but only 52.78% of its losses — a favorable profile for investors.
  • R² of 0.16 means this portfolio moves largely independently of S&P 500 Index — capture ratios reflect limited market correlation rather than active downside protection. Consider using a more representative benchmark.

Alpha
27.37%
Beta
0.80
0.16
Upside Capture
140.49%
Downside Capture
52.78%

Expense Ratio

BO has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


The portfolio doesn't include any funds that charge management fees.

Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

BO ranks 11 for risk / return — in the bottom 11% of portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.


BO Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
BO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
BO Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
BO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
BO Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.31

2.30

-0.98

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.88

3.18

-1.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.43

-0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

3.40

-1.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.37

15.35

-9.98


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
641.261.821.241.635.19
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
912.994.011.514.5618.36
ROK
Rockwell Automation, Inc.
872.573.441.454.0513.23
AFL
Aflac Incorporated
430.390.671.080.841.85

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

BO Sharpe ratios as of Apr 16, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 1.31
  • 5-Year: 0.38
  • 10-Year: 0.52
  • All Time: 0.75

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 2.19 to 3.00, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio places it in the bottom 25%. This suggests weaker risk-adjusted returns than most portfolios, possibly due to lower returns, higher volatility, or both. It may be worth reviewing the allocation. You can use the Portfolio Optimization tool to explore options for improving the Sharpe ratio.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of BO compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

BO provided a 0.80% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio0.80%0.82%0.97%0.98%1.18%0.91%1.07%1.20%1.45%1.00%1.34%1.70%
MNST
Monster Beverage Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
0.75%0.80%1.00%1.25%1.73%1.25%1.29%1.65%1.97%1.32%1.80%2.60%
ROK
Rockwell Automation, Inc.
1.35%1.36%1.77%1.54%1.76%1.24%1.65%1.94%2.42%1.59%2.18%2.61%
AFL
Aflac Incorporated
2.08%2.10%1.93%2.04%2.22%2.26%2.52%2.04%2.28%1.98%2.39%2.64%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the BO. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the BO was 68.81%, occurring on Oct 27, 2008. Recovery took 644 trading sessions.

The current BO drawdown is 13.35%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-68.81%Oct 19, 2007258Oct 27, 2008644May 18, 2011902
-50.12%Jul 6, 200690Nov 9, 2006213Sep 18, 2007303
-47.17%Jun 19, 201289Oct 23, 2012454Aug 15, 2014543
-40.52%Aug 13, 199840Oct 8, 199828Nov 17, 199868
-34.62%May 6, 1999598Sep 21, 2001454Jul 14, 20031052

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 4 assets, with an effective number of assets of 3.51, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkAFLMNSTROKPHPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.560.320.610.630.42
AFL0.561.000.220.400.430.32
MNST0.320.221.000.230.220.94
ROK0.610.400.231.000.590.36
PH0.630.430.220.591.000.34
Portfolio0.420.320.940.360.341.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Aug 21, 1995