PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
Alternative Screener Test T15 9/12
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


S&P 500 Index

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right asset allocation for Alternative Screener Test T15 9/12

Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Alternative Screener Test T15 9/12, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading charts...

Returns By Period


Position1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.50%0.31%8.56%8.85%24.33%19.37%11.84%13.61%
Portfolio
Alternative Screener Test T15 9/12
-0.13%3.03%4.88%8.42%15.76%20.10%12.30%
BKR
Baker Hughes Company
-0.54%-2.28%39.64%35.70%64.52%30.72%22.39%
CAKE
The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated
0.40%26.54%50.58%52.45%34.66%33.20%8.52%6.31%
CSL
Carlisle Companies Incorporated
0.82%-0.87%8.12%4.47%-2.49%14.36%13.87%14.57%
EQH
Equitable Holdings, Inc.
0.94%4.28%-6.30%-7.48%-12.50%20.47%9.89%
FUN
Cedar Fair, L.P.
-3.90%16.73%52.80%57.21%-21.53%-16.99%-11.16%-5.82%
GIC
Global Industrial Company
0.38%11.21%11.00%8.19%26.13%8.68%2.22%21.48%
GMAB
Genmab A/S
-0.63%-5.50%-18.57%-19.90%9.90%-13.28%-10.53%4.28%
HALO
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
-1.74%3.55%3.27%11.72%28.75%27.10%10.19%22.84%
ISSC
Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc.
-4.59%13.55%-2.43%65.59%46.20%38.47%24.62%21.80%
RJF
Raymond James Financial, Inc.
2.65%-0.75%-3.17%-5.10%7.45%18.32%13.66%17.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since May 10, 2018, Alternative Screener Test T15 9/12's average daily return is +0.07%, while the average monthly return is +1.40%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 4.2 years.

Historically, 61% of months were positive and 39% were negative. The best month was Nov 2020 with a return of +18.8%, while the worst month was Mar 2020 at -17.1%. The longest winning streak lasted 5 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 4 months.

On a daily basis, Alternative Screener Test T15 9/12 closed higher 54% of trading days. The best single day was Mar 13, 2020 with a return of +10.1%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -13.6%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20263.82%4.69%-4.16%1.64%-2.94%2.07%4.88%
20256.76%-2.73%-3.73%-1.71%7.24%2.11%1.34%5.01%4.02%-6.72%0.88%2.31%14.68%
2024-1.86%6.80%3.14%-1.15%6.40%1.97%3.65%3.40%-1.75%0.78%6.79%-6.54%22.81%
20235.04%-3.35%-4.82%-0.45%-4.58%6.63%8.45%-0.45%-2.23%-3.46%7.69%4.40%12.13%
2022-4.82%4.41%4.97%-4.51%5.79%-4.36%5.98%-1.77%-5.74%13.34%6.33%-4.99%13.23%
2021-1.02%3.87%3.91%6.08%-0.04%0.05%0.85%2.63%-5.55%-1.64%-6.07%7.38%9.91%

Benchmark Metrics

Alternative Screener Test T15 9/12 has an annualized alpha of 4.99%, beta of 0.86, and R2 of 0.68 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since May 10, 2018.

  • This portfolio participates in less of S&P 500 Index's moves in both directions, but captures a larger share of gains (89.00%) than losses (74.99%) - typical of diversified or defensive assets.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 4.99% versus S&P 500 Index - delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
  • With beta of 0.86 and R2 of 0.68, this portfolio moves broadly in line with S&P 500 Index - much of its variation is explained by market exposure rather than independent behavior.

Alpha
4.99%
Beta
0.86
0.68
Upside Capture
89.00%
Downside Capture
74.99%

Expense Ratio

Alternative Screener Test T15 9/12 has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


The portfolio doesn't include any funds that charge management fees.

Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

Alternative Screener Test T15 9/12 ranks 13 for risk / return — in the bottom 13% of Portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.


Alternative Screener Test T15 9/12 Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
Alternative Screener Test T15 9/12 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
Alternative Screener Test T15 9/12 Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
Alternative Screener Test T15 9/12 Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
Alternative Screener Test T15 9/12 Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
Alternative Screener Test T15 9/12 Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics

The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alternative Screener Test T15 9/12 and compares them with S&P 500 Index.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.95

1.86

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

1.45

2.53

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.34

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

2.53

-1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.37

11.37

-8.00


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

PositionRisk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
BKR
Baker Hughes Company
88
2.012.701.343.9511.78
CAKE
The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated
64
0.891.391.170.841.86
CSL
Carlisle Companies Incorporated
35
-0.140.051.01-0.16-0.27
EQH
Equitable Holdings, Inc.
24
-0.47-0.460.94-0.42-0.82
FUN
Cedar Fair, L.P.
28
-0.39-0.170.98-0.43-0.66
GIC
Global Industrial Company
61
0.551.141.190.761.42
GMAB
Genmab A/S
48
0.250.591.070.270.58
HALO
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
66
0.911.411.171.142.16
ISSC
Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc.
62
0.601.381.180.871.59
RJF
Raymond James Financial, Inc.
46
0.220.441.060.270.57

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk. Learn how to interpret the Sharpe ratio.

The current Alternative Screener Test T15 9/12 Sharpe ratio is 0.95 as of Jun 13, 2026 (the value is recalculated daily), calculated over the past 12 months.

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.53 to 2.41, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio places it in the bottom 25%. This suggests weaker risk-adjusted returns than most portfolios, possibly due to lower returns, higher volatility, or both. It may be worth reviewing the allocation. You can use the Portfolio Optimization tool to explore options for improving the Sharpe ratio.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of Alternative Screener Test T15 9/12 compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading charts...

Dividends

Dividend yield

Alternative Screener Test T15 9/12 provided a 1.25% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio1.25%1.23%1.25%1.05%0.99%0.88%2.03%1.08%2.83%3.33%0.50%0.47%
BKR
Baker Hughes Company
1.46%2.02%2.05%2.28%2.47%2.99%3.45%2.81%3.35%56.42%0.00%0.00%
CAKE
The Cheesecake Factory Incorporated
1.51%2.14%2.28%3.08%2.55%0.00%0.97%3.55%2.85%2.20%1.47%1.58%
CSL
Carlisle Companies Incorporated
1.28%1.31%1.00%1.02%1.09%0.86%1.31%1.11%1.53%1.27%1.18%1.24%
EQH
Equitable Holdings, Inc.
2.52%2.20%1.99%2.58%2.72%2.17%2.58%2.34%1.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FUN
Cedar Fair, L.P.
0.00%0.00%4.42%3.02%1.45%0.00%2.38%6.69%7.60%5.32%5.19%5.51%
GIC
Global Industrial Company
3.39%3.56%4.03%2.06%3.06%4.01%9.92%1.91%39.51%1.05%1.14%0.00%
GMAB
Genmab A/S
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HALO
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ISSC
Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.00%17.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RJF
Raymond James Financial, Inc.
1.35%1.25%0.87%1.53%1.67%1.04%1.16%1.93%1.48%0.74%1.18%1.28%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading charts...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Alternative Screener Test T15 9/12. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the Alternative Screener Test T15 9/12 was 35.22%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 52 trading sessions.

The current Alternative Screener Test T15 9/12 drawdown is 4.35%.


Related event

Drawdown

Fall

Recovery

Underwater

COVID crash2020
-35.22%Mar 2020
1mo 1d2mo 14d
3mo 15dFeb 2020 - Jun 2020
Rate-hike selloffLate 2018
-18.99%Dec 2018
3mo 26d2mo 7d
6mo 3dAug 2018 - Mar 2019
2025 selloff2025
-17.49%Apr 2025
1mo 23d2mo 24d
4mo 17dFeb 2025 - Jul 2025
2021 correction2021
-14.25%Dec 2021
2mo 29d4mo 20d
7mo 19dSep 2021 - Apr 2022
2023 correction2023
-13.74%May 2023
2mo 12d2mo 25d
5mo 7dFeb 2023 - Jul 2023

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 15 assets, with an effective number of assets of 11.24, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is well-distributed across most of your holdings, with only mild concentration in a few names. True diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.


Diversification Ratio
1Y
3Y
5Y
All Time
Diversification Ratio

2.49

2.19

2.03

1.83

The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.83, placing it in the top 5% across portfolios — assets in this portfolio move largely independently, providing strong diversification benefit.

Alternative Screener Test T15 9/12 correlation to the S&P 500 Index

Alternative Screener Test T15 9/12 has a 0.53 correlation to S&P 500 Index over the trailing 12 months. This section compares each holding's correlation to the benchmark and to the portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2018

0.72


Benchmark Correlations

Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. RJF has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.62, while ISSC has the lowest at 0.24.

ISSC
0.24
UTHR
0.31
ULBI
0.31
GMAB
0.34
STRA
0.36
FUN
0.37
TMUS
0.39
CAKE
0.39
BKR
0.40
HALO
0.41
UHS
0.44
GIC
0.47
CSL
0.58
EQH
0.62
RJF
0.62

Portfolio Correlations

Correlation vs. Alternative Screener Test T15 9/12. CSL has the highest portfolio correlation at 0.64, while ISSC has the lowest at 0.35.

ISSC
0.35
ULBI
0.41
FUN
0.43
GMAB
0.44
BKR
0.45
UTHR
0.49
STRA
0.49
CAKE
0.51
UHS
0.53
HALO
0.53
TMUS
0.54
GIC
0.54
RJF
0.64
EQH
0.64
CSL
0.64

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from May 10, 2018
Diversification Analysis

Find what Alternative Screener Test T15 9/12 is missing

See which holdings overlap, where Alternative Screener Test T15 9/12 is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.

Analyze Diversification