PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
gmas port
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in gmas port, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Feb 4, 2015, corresponding to the inception date of XHR

Returns By Period

As of Apr 4, 2026, the gmas port returned 1.26% Year-To-Date and 26.23% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.11%-3.63%-3.84%-1.98%29.73%16.86%10.37%12.29%
Portfolio
gmas port
0.38%-3.14%1.26%3.05%32.38%14.68%38.23%26.23%
IVT
Inventrust Properties Corp
0.99%-0.70%9.83%11.70%16.95%13.33%95.30%34.45%
XHR
Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
1.23%-3.28%5.75%13.02%57.17%8.78%-3.23%3.54%
NLCAX
Voya Large-Cap Growth Fund
0.05%-4.92%-9.67%-9.71%27.27%19.81%9.15%13.58%
IJPIX
VY JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio
-0.56%-3.07%5.27%10.60%46.74%15.05%1.11%9.04%
IRGJX
Voya Russell Mid Cap Growth Index Portfolio
0.28%-4.74%-5.60%-9.84%14.50%12.73%4.81%11.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Feb 5, 2015, gmas port's average daily return is +0.13%, while the average monthly return is +2.72%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 2.2 years.

Historically, 57% of months were positive and 43% were negative. The best month was Sep 2021 with a return of +270.7%, while the worst month was Sep 2022 at -11.8%. The longest winning streak lasted 8 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 4 months.

On a daily basis, gmas port closed higher 53% of trading days. The best single day was Sep 27, 2021 with a return of +239.3%, while the worst single day was Sep 6, 2016 at -19.1%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20263.23%2.31%-4.86%0.78%1.26%
20253.29%-6.49%-3.74%-1.74%7.84%3.93%1.42%5.29%0.81%-1.43%2.37%0.38%11.64%
2024-0.95%7.33%1.55%-4.18%2.06%2.28%1.50%2.85%1.97%0.22%5.65%-2.29%18.94%
20238.61%-3.62%0.37%-1.68%-2.04%6.85%3.55%-3.97%-2.71%-0.75%6.05%6.52%17.25%
2022-6.63%-1.54%4.80%-6.47%-2.74%-10.84%9.90%-4.21%-11.83%10.44%3.25%-7.58%-23.57%
2021-0.92%9.69%-0.53%4.93%1.28%-0.70%-2.44%2.17%270.73%6.71%-3.73%6.17%359.82%

Benchmark Metrics

gmas port has an annualized alpha of 24.84%, beta of 0.87, and R² of 0.04 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since February 05, 2015.

  • This portfolio participates in less of S&P 500 Index's moves in both directions, but captures a larger share of gains (80.44%) than losses (19.15%) — typical of diversified or defensive assets.
  • R² of 0.04 means this portfolio moves largely independently of S&P 500 Index — capture ratios reflect limited market correlation rather than active downside protection. Consider using a more representative benchmark.

Alpha
24.84%
Beta
0.87
0.04
Upside Capture
80.44%
Downside Capture
19.15%

Expense Ratio

gmas port has an expense ratio of 0.58%, placing it in the medium range. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

gmas port ranks 34 for risk / return — below 34% of portfolios on our site. The returns aren't fully compensating for the risk involved. This isn't necessarily a dealbreaker, but factor it into your decision — especially if you're risk-averse.


gmas port Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
gmas port Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
gmas port Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
gmas port Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
gmas port Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
gmas port Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.06

0.88

+0.18

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.63

1.37

+0.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.21

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

1.39

+0.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.66

6.43

+0.22


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
IVT
Inventrust Properties Corp
500.360.641.080.631.49
XHR
Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
680.891.461.191.424.54
NLCAX
Voya Large-Cap Growth Fund
180.681.161.150.491.47
IJPIX
VY JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio
882.192.901.412.459.73
IRGJX
Voya Russell Mid Cap Growth Index Portfolio
70.340.681.09-0.24-0.79

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

gmas port Sharpe ratios as of Apr 4, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 1.06
  • 5-Year: 0.35
  • 10-Year: 0.33
  • All Time: 0.28

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 0.99 to 1.69, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of gmas port compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

gmas port provided a 12.91% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio12.91%12.73%2.42%1.68%16.97%6.24%5.64%5.72%5.65%2.66%3.49%4.79%
IVT
Inventrust Properties Corp
3.13%3.37%3.00%3.40%3.47%0.82%1.72%3.51%0.00%1.13%4.18%0.77%
XHR
Xenia Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
3.78%3.96%3.23%2.94%1.52%0.00%1.81%5.09%6.40%5.09%5.66%5.45%
NLCAX
Voya Large-Cap Growth Fund
17.89%16.16%4.69%0.00%24.97%18.15%13.40%4.61%7.42%5.86%5.52%7.37%
IJPIX
VY JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio
24.58%25.88%0.82%1.67%42.85%8.66%5.75%5.37%0.66%0.40%1.15%9.47%
IRGJX
Voya Russell Mid Cap Growth Index Portfolio
15.13%14.29%0.35%0.42%12.03%3.55%5.50%10.03%13.76%0.83%0.96%0.91%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the gmas port. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the gmas port was 35.31%, occurring on Dec 11, 2015. Recovery took 443 trading sessions.

The current gmas port drawdown is 5.55%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-35.31%Feb 11, 2015212Dec 11, 2015443Sep 15, 2017655
-34.45%Jan 21, 202044Mar 23, 2020161Nov 9, 2020205
-28.81%Nov 8, 2021226Sep 30, 2022494Sep 19, 2024720
-23.24%Dec 5, 202484Apr 8, 202586Aug 12, 2025170
-22.76%Aug 30, 201880Dec 24, 2018233Nov 26, 2019313

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 5 assets, with an effective number of assets of 5.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkIVTXHRIJPIXNLCAXIRGJXPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.230.510.670.910.860.80
IVT0.231.000.260.130.150.220.45
XHR0.510.261.000.370.400.470.75
IJPIX0.670.130.371.000.660.670.70
NLCAX0.910.150.400.661.000.870.75
IRGJX0.860.220.470.670.871.000.81
Portfolio0.800.450.750.700.750.811.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Feb 5, 2015