PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BEST 4 5 YRS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


NVDA 25.00%AVGO 25.00%GOOGL 25.00%TSLA 25.00%EquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right asset allocation for BEST 4 5 YRS

Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in BEST 4 5 YRS, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of Jun 6, 2026, the BEST 4 5 YRS returned 8.30% Year-To-Date and 50.22% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


Position1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.30%0.09%8.18%8.17%23.42%19.88%11.91%13.45%
Portfolio
BEST 4 5 YRS
1.81%-6.31%8.30%4.91%64.34%56.61%45.73%50.22%
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
2.82%-7.77%14.83%-0.72%61.91%72.46%56.70%41.32%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
-1.36%-9.30%16.22%15.96%110.03%44.20%24.94%25.89%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
1.73%-2.94%12.01%12.58%47.43%75.35%64.54%68.47%
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
4.59%-4.53%-9.07%-6.97%38.56%18.72%15.43%39.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Jun 30, 2010, BEST 4 5 YRS's average daily return is +0.17%, while the average monthly return is +3.56%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 1.7 years.

Historically, 66% of months were positive and 34% were negative. The best month was Aug 2020 with a return of +33.3%, while the worst month was Apr 2022 at -20.3%. The longest winning streak lasted 11 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 4 months.

On a daily basis, BEST 4 5 YRS closed higher 56% of trading days. The best single day was Apr 9, 2025 with a return of +17.3%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -17.2%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20260.49%-6.34%-4.98%21.47%5.99%-5.94%8.30%
2025-1.77%-13.02%-12.46%6.74%20.33%6.31%6.30%4.41%16.20%9.71%1.39%-2.33%43.09%
20241.52%12.61%5.04%1.44%7.78%12.50%1.61%-2.53%8.54%1.60%8.66%16.47%104.15%
202322.79%8.85%10.64%-5.10%25.89%10.67%6.79%1.96%-7.20%-7.52%12.49%9.24%124.51%
2022-11.67%-1.84%11.30%-20.26%-1.91%-12.38%17.29%-9.53%-10.86%0.43%10.20%-12.67%-39.53%
20214.81%0.99%-0.34%7.79%0.01%9.87%2.68%7.85%-3.00%21.87%7.92%-0.25%76.07%

Benchmark Metrics

BEST 4 5 YRS has an annualized alpha of 27.10%, beta of 1.42, and R2 of 0.57 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since June 30, 2010.

  • This portfolio captured 229.95% of S&P 500 Index gains but only 85.14% of its losses - a favorable profile for investors.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 27.10% versus S&P 500 Index - delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.

Alpha
27.10%
Beta
1.42
0.57
Upside Capture
229.95%
Downside Capture
85.14%

Expense Ratio

BEST 4 5 YRS has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


The portfolio doesn't include any funds that charge management fees.

Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

BEST 4 5 YRS ranks 41 for risk / return — on par with similar Portfolios. You're getting a typical balance of risk and reward. Not a standout, but not a red flag either — a reasonable choice if other factors align with your goals.


BEST 4 5 YRS Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
BEST 4 5 YRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BEST 4 5 YRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
BEST 4 5 YRS Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
BEST 4 5 YRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
BEST 4 5 YRS Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics

The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for BEST 4 5 YRS and compares them with S&P 500 Index.


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

2.35

1.94

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

2.94

2.63

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.35

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

2.59

+0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.75

11.84

-0.09


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

PositionRisk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
771.381.951.262.175.16
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
963.785.101.615.4319.79
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
771.371.941.242.365.73
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
660.871.431.171.293.01

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

BEST 4 5 YRS Sharpe ratios as of Jun 6, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 2.35
  • 5-Year: 1.27
  • 10-Year: 1.44
  • All Time: 1.45

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.64 to 2.53, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of BEST 4 5 YRS compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading charts...

Dividends

Dividend yield

BEST 4 5 YRS provided a 0.26% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio0.26%0.25%0.32%0.43%0.78%0.57%0.79%0.95%0.89%0.54%0.47%0.58%
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
0.63%0.70%0.94%1.71%3.02%2.24%3.05%3.54%3.11%1.87%1.43%1.13%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc. Class A
0.29%0.27%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
TSLA
Tesla, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading charts...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the BEST 4 5 YRS. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the BEST 4 5 YRS was 45.82%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 56 trading sessions.

The current BEST 4 5 YRS drawdown is 11.25%.


Related event

Drawdown

Fall

Recovery

Underwater

COVID crash2020
-45.82%Mar 2020
27d2mo 22d
3mo 19dFeb 2020 - Jun 2020
Bear market2022
-44.78%Oct 2022
9mo 13d7mo 14d
1y 4moJan 2022 - May 2023
2025 selloff2025
-36.87%Apr 2025
3mo 9d3mo 15d
6mo 24dDec 2024 - Jul 2025
2019 bear market2019
-27.26%Jun 2019
11mo 19d4mo 24d
1y 4moJun 2018 - Oct 2019
2011 bear market2011
-27.03%Aug 2011
6mo 5d5mo 28d
12mo 3dFeb 2011 - Feb 2012

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 4 assets, with an effective number of assets of 4.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your capital is spread almost evenly across your holdings, indicating a well-balanced allocation. Note that true diversification also depends on the correlations between assets — check the diversification ratio below.


Diversification Ratio
1Y
3Y
5Y
10Y
All Time
Diversification Ratio

1.39

1.31

1.28

1.28

1.32

The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.32, in line with the typical range across portfolios. There's room to improve by adding less correlated assets.

BEST 4 5 YRS correlation to the S&P 500 Index

BEST 4 5 YRS has a 0.76 correlation to S&P 500 Index over the trailing 12 months. This section compares each holding's correlation to the benchmark and to the portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2010

0.71


Benchmark Correlations

Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. GOOGL has the highest benchmark correlation at 0.68, while TSLA has the lowest at 0.46.

TSLA
0.46
NVDA
0.60
AVGO
0.62
GOOGL
0.68

Portfolio Correlations

Correlation vs. BEST 4 5 YRS. NVDA has the highest portfolio correlation at 0.77, while GOOGL has the lowest at 0.65.

GOOGL
0.65
AVGO
0.73
TSLA
0.76
NVDA
0.77

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

TSLAGOOGLAVGONVDA
TSLA1.000.370.370.39
GOOGL0.371.000.450.49
AVGO0.370.451.000.56
NVDA0.390.490.561.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Jun 30, 2010
Diversification Analysis

Find what BEST 4 5 YRS is missing

See which holdings overlap, where BEST 4 5 YRS is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.

Analyze Diversification