Asset Allocation
| Position | Category/Sector | Target Weight |
|---|---|---|
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund | China Equities | 40% |
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF | China Equities | 60% |
Performance
Performance Chart
The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in china port, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.
Loading graphics...
The earliest data available for this chart is Nov 6, 2013, corresponding to the inception date of ASHR
Returns By Period
As of Apr 15, 2026, the china port returned 0.11% Year-To-Date and 4.91% of annualized return in the last 10 years.
| 1D | 1M | YTD | 6M | 1Y | 3Y* | 5Y* | 10Y* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark S&P 500 Index | 1.18% | 4.00% | 1.78% | 4.44% | 29.11% | 18.97% | 10.81% | 12.85% |
Portfolio china port | 1.28% | 0.51% | 0.11% | -0.83% | 26.55% | 8.21% | -2.76% | 4.91% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund | 1.43% | 3.31% | 5.45% | 10.28% | 38.23% | 7.25% | -0.28% | 4.68% |
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF | 1.17% | 0.42% | -3.41% | -6.15% | 17.30% | 8.47% | -4.79% | 4.72% |
Monthly Returns
Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Nov 7, 2013, china port's average daily return is +0.03%, while the average monthly return is +0.60%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 9.7 years.
Historically, 53% of months were positive and 47% were negative. The best month was Nov 2022 with a return of +25.8%, while the worst month was Jan 2016 at -15.5%. The longest winning streak lasted 13 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 6 months.
On a daily basis, china port closed higher 50% of trading days. The best single day was Mar 16, 2022 with a return of +16.2%, while the worst single day was Oct 8, 2024 at -12.3%.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 3.04% | -2.46% | -4.60% | 4.41% | 0.11% | ||||||||
| 2025 | 1.30% | 7.42% | 0.98% | -4.15% | 2.15% | 5.02% | 3.77% | 9.07% | 5.68% | -2.02% | -1.83% | -0.02% | 29.97% |
| 2024 | -9.13% | 7.39% | 1.22% | 4.18% | 2.40% | -3.32% | -0.30% | -0.29% | 21.72% | -3.57% | -2.55% | -0.22% | 15.58% |
| 2023 | 12.23% | -8.79% | 2.68% | -3.00% | -8.99% | 2.21% | 9.60% | -9.03% | -2.78% | -3.76% | 1.14% | -1.84% | -12.17% |
| 2022 | -2.88% | -3.71% | -9.72% | -6.54% | 2.75% | 9.10% | -9.90% | -1.92% | -12.31% | -14.09% | 25.83% | 1.64% | -24.70% |
| 2021 | 6.12% | -0.32% | -6.32% | 1.19% | 2.51% | -1.03% | -10.95% | -0.13% | -2.41% | 2.20% | -3.79% | -0.79% | -13.88% |
Benchmark Metrics
china port has an annualized alpha of -1.42%, beta of 0.76, and R² of 0.26 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since November 07, 2013.
- This portfolio participated in 72.70% of S&P 500 Index downside but only 52.68% of its upside — more exposed to losses than it benefited from rallies.
- R² of 0.26 means this portfolio moves largely independently of S&P 500 Index — capture ratios reflect limited market correlation rather than active downside protection. Consider using a more representative benchmark.
- Alpha
- -1.42%
- Beta
- 0.76
- R²
- 0.26
- Upside Capture
- 52.68%
- Downside Capture
- 72.70%
Expense Ratio
china port has an expense ratio of 0.61%, placing it in the medium range. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.
Return for Risk
Risk / Return Rank
china port ranks 17 for risk / return — in the bottom 17% of portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.
Return / Risk — by metrics
| Portfolio | Benchmark | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.45 | 2.20 | -0.75 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.08 | 3.07 | -0.98 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.41 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 3.55 | -0.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.57 | 16.01 | -8.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.
| Risk / Return Rank | Sharpe ratio | Sortino ratio | Omega ratio | Calmar ratio | Martin ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund | 70 | 2.35 | 3.28 | 1.43 | 5.25 | 16.69 |
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF | 19 | 0.86 | 1.33 | 1.16 | 1.38 | 3.56 |
Loading graphics...
Dividends
Dividend yield
china port provided a 2.19% dividend yield over the last twelve months.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portfolio | 2.19% | 2.19% | 1.84% | 2.59% | 1.52% | 0.98% | 0.95% | 1.26% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.29% | 13.71% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||||||
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund | 2.19% | 2.31% | 1.13% | 2.48% | 1.13% | 0.88% | 0.81% | 0.98% | 1.32% | 0.84% | 0.73% | 30.13% |
MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF | 2.19% | 2.12% | 2.31% | 2.66% | 1.78% | 1.04% | 1.04% | 1.45% | 1.60% | 1.56% | 1.66% | 2.76% |
Drawdowns
Drawdowns Chart
The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.
Loading graphics...
Worst Drawdowns
The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the china port. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.
The maximum drawdown for the china port was 57.15%, occurring on Oct 31, 2022. The portfolio has not yet recovered.
The current china port drawdown is 27.61%.
Depth | Start | To Bottom | Bottom | To Recover | End | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -57.15% | Feb 18, 2021 | 430 | Oct 31, 2022 | — | — | — |
| -44.77% | May 27, 2015 | 181 | Feb 11, 2016 | 449 | Nov 21, 2017 | 630 |
| -34.51% | Jan 29, 2018 | 235 | Jan 3, 2019 | 378 | Jul 6, 2020 | 613 |
| -15.83% | Dec 9, 2013 | 70 | Mar 20, 2014 | 89 | Jul 28, 2014 | 159 |
| -7.81% | Sep 8, 2014 | 19 | Oct 2, 2014 | 31 | Nov 14, 2014 | 50 |
Volatility
Volatility Chart
The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Diversification
Diversification Metrics
Number of Effective Assets
The portfolio contains 2 assets, with an effective number of assets of 1.92, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.
Asset Correlations Table
| Benchmark | ASHR | MCHI | Portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | 1.00 | 0.38 | 0.54 | 0.50 |
| ASHR | 0.38 | 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.89 |
| MCHI | 0.54 | 0.74 | 1.00 | 0.96 |
| Portfolio | 0.50 | 0.89 | 0.96 | 1.00 |