PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
Dragon percentages testing
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


LCSIX 10.00%TLT 10.00%GLD 20.00%VT 60.00%AlternativesAlternativesBondBondCommodityCommodityEquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Dragon percentages testing, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every month.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Jan 17, 2012, corresponding to the inception date of LCSIX

Returns By Period

As of Apr 4, 2026, the Dragon percentages testing returned 1.83% Year-To-Date and 10.35% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.11%-4.18%-3.84%-1.98%21.98%16.86%10.37%12.29%
Portfolio
Dragon percentages testing
-0.46%-4.17%1.83%5.07%25.69%16.17%9.73%10.35%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
-1.92%-8.98%8.35%20.07%49.92%32.51%21.53%13.97%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
-0.23%-3.83%-0.97%1.25%26.32%16.97%9.38%11.66%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
0.61%-2.26%0.69%-0.72%-1.22%-2.76%-5.75%-1.34%
LCSIX
LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund
0.11%0.91%2.90%1.51%2.08%-2.11%1.94%2.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Jan 18, 2012, Dragon percentages testing's average daily return is +0.04%, while the average monthly return is +0.73%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 7.9 years.

Historically, 65% of months were positive and 35% were negative. The best month was Apr 2020 with a return of +7.8%, while the worst month was Mar 2020 at -7.4%. The longest winning streak lasted 14 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 4 months.

On a daily basis, Dragon percentages testing closed higher 55% of trading days. The best single day was Apr 9, 2025 with a return of +5.8%, while the worst single day was Mar 12, 2020 at -6.7%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20265.15%2.78%-6.23%0.48%1.83%
20253.50%0.50%-0.10%1.07%3.07%3.35%0.42%2.77%4.78%2.04%1.14%0.69%25.73%
2024-0.38%2.47%3.78%-2.23%3.42%1.11%2.49%1.90%2.54%-1.24%2.03%-3.09%13.26%
20236.58%-3.66%3.77%1.03%-1.32%2.83%2.58%-2.36%-4.06%-1.14%6.96%4.30%15.77%
2022-3.40%-0.48%1.16%-6.16%-0.66%-5.42%3.91%-3.43%-7.30%3.09%7.32%-2.28%-13.76%
2021-1.15%0.14%0.79%3.76%2.57%-0.01%1.25%1.29%-3.08%3.83%-1.53%2.89%11.01%

Benchmark Metrics

Dragon percentages testing has an annualized alpha of 1.98%, beta of 0.54, and R² of 0.76 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since January 18, 2012.

  • This portfolio participated in 61.00% of S&P 500 Index downside but only 59.51% of its upside — more exposed to losses than it benefited from rallies.
  • Beta of 0.54 indicates this portfolio moves significantly less than S&P 500 Index — a genuinely defensive profile with reduced participation in both market rallies and downturns.

Alpha
1.98%
Beta
0.54
0.76
Upside Capture
59.51%
Downside Capture
61.00%

Expense Ratio

Dragon percentages testing has an expense ratio of 0.31%, placing it in the medium range. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

Dragon percentages testing ranks 78 for risk / return — better than 78% of portfolios on our site. You're getting solid returns for the risk taken. A good sign, especially for investors who want growth without excessive volatility.


Dragon percentages testing Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
Dragon percentages testing Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
Dragon percentages testing Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
Dragon percentages testing Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
Dragon percentages testing Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
Dragon percentages testing Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.73

0.88

+0.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.42

1.37

+1.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.21

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

1.39

+1.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.43

6.43

+4.00


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
781.772.191.322.579.28
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
661.241.831.271.868.47
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
9-0.07-0.011.00-0.09-0.19
LCSIX
LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund
40.060.121.020.110.23

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

Dragon percentages testing Sharpe ratios as of Apr 4, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 1.73
  • 5-Year: 0.86
  • 10-Year: 0.94
  • All Time: 0.84

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 0.99 to 1.69, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio is in the top 25%. This signifies superior risk-adjusted performance, meaning the portfolio is delivering strong returns for the level of risk taken compared to most others.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of Dragon percentages testing compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

Dragon percentages testing provided a 1.76% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio1.76%1.77%1.88%1.78%2.66%1.96%1.44%1.67%3.02%1.51%2.01%2.47%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.80%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.51%4.43%4.30%3.38%2.67%1.50%1.50%2.27%2.63%2.43%2.60%2.61%
LCSIX
LoCorr Long/Short Commodity Strategies Fund
2.25%2.32%2.75%1.88%10.75%7.14%2.94%0.54%12.36%0.02%3.21%7.36%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Dragon percentages testing. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the Dragon percentages testing was 21.08%, occurring on Oct 14, 2022. Recovery took 325 trading sessions.

The current Dragon percentages testing drawdown is 5.78%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-21.08%Nov 15, 2021232Oct 14, 2022325Feb 1, 2024557
-20.35%Feb 20, 202022Mar 20, 202054Jun 8, 202076
-12.25%Jan 29, 2018229Dec 24, 2018120Jun 18, 2019349
-10.03%Feb 19, 202535Apr 8, 202518May 5, 202553
-9.92%Apr 29, 2015184Jan 20, 201662Apr 19, 2016246

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 4 assets, with an effective number of assets of 2.38, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkLCSIXTLTGLDVTPortfolio
Benchmark1.00-0.05-0.190.030.950.83
LCSIX-0.051.000.130.10-0.050.07
TLT-0.190.131.000.26-0.180.04
GLD0.030.100.261.000.110.44
VT0.95-0.05-0.180.111.000.90
Portfolio0.830.070.040.440.901.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Jan 18, 2012