PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
Lazy Jack x3
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


USFR 40.00%TQQQ 60.00%BondBondEquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Lazy Jack x3, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Feb 4, 2014, corresponding to the inception date of USFR

Returns By Period

As of Apr 8, 2026, the Lazy Jack x3 returned -7.93% Year-To-Date and 27.86% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.08%-1.83%-3.34%-1.46%30.71%17.25%10.06%12.45%
Portfolio
Lazy Jack x3
0.08%-2.53%-7.93%-7.38%65.29%33.88%14.25%27.86%
USFR
WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund
0.02%0.27%0.99%2.02%4.14%4.86%3.55%2.41%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.11%-6.98%-16.12%-15.88%115.55%49.38%11.90%36.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Feb 5, 2014, Lazy Jack x3's average daily return is +0.12%, while the average monthly return is +2.41%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 2.4 years.

Historically, 61% of months were positive and 39% were negative. The best month was Apr 2020 with a return of +27.6%, while the worst month was Mar 2020 at -22.1%. The longest winning streak lasted 7 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 4 months.

On a daily basis, Lazy Jack x3 closed higher 56% of trading days. The best single day was Apr 9, 2025 with a return of +17.8%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -17.1%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20261.59%-4.85%-8.16%3.71%-7.93%
20252.86%-5.56%-13.35%-2.42%16.39%12.15%3.95%0.91%9.89%7.89%-4.00%-1.77%25.75%
20242.50%9.05%1.68%-8.36%10.61%11.32%-4.32%0.46%3.60%-2.34%9.06%-0.15%35.83%
202319.61%-2.13%18.21%0.18%14.22%11.79%6.61%-3.84%-9.57%-4.61%19.79%10.64%107.46%
2022-15.21%-7.91%4.91%-21.86%-4.53%-12.94%23.08%-11.06%-19.21%5.05%7.67%-16.43%-55.52%
2021-0.28%-0.83%1.40%11.01%-3.08%12.44%4.99%7.80%-10.76%14.67%3.50%1.25%47.22%

Benchmark Metrics

Lazy Jack x3 has an annualized alpha of 6.52%, beta of 1.93, and R² of 0.84 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since February 05, 2014.

  • This portfolio captured 262.21% of S&P 500 Index gains and 166.75% of its losses — amplifying both gains and losses, but participating more in upside than downside.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 6.52% versus S&P 500 Index — delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
  • Beta of 1.93 means this portfolio moves significantly more than S&P 500 Index — expect amplified gains in rallies and amplified losses in downturns.

Alpha
6.52%
Beta
1.93
0.84
Upside Capture
262.21%
Downside Capture
166.75%

Expense Ratio

Lazy Jack x3 has an expense ratio of 0.63%, placing it in the medium range. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

Lazy Jack x3 ranks 31 for risk / return — below 31% of portfolios on our site. The returns aren't fully compensating for the risk involved. This isn't necessarily a dealbreaker, but factor it into your decision — especially if you're risk-averse.


Lazy Jack x3 Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
Lazy Jack x3 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
Lazy Jack x3 Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
Lazy Jack x3 Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
Lazy Jack x3 Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
Lazy Jack x3 Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.86

1.87

-0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.63

3.01

-0.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.41

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

2.49

-0.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.11

11.08

-3.97


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
USFR
WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund
10014.6244.2711.22103.73690.30
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
621.862.631.352.086.82

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

Lazy Jack x3 Sharpe ratios as of Apr 8, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 1.86
  • 5-Year: 0.38
  • 10-Year: 0.73
  • All Time: 0.72

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.83 to 2.70, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of Lazy Jack x3 compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

Lazy Jack x3 provided a 2.03% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio2.03%2.05%2.83%2.80%1.05%0.00%0.16%0.87%0.73%0.41%0.12%0.01%
USFR
WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund
4.00%4.15%5.17%5.12%1.78%0.01%0.40%2.08%1.67%1.03%0.29%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.71%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Lazy Jack x3. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the Lazy Jack x3 was 58.90%, occurring on Dec 28, 2022. Recovery took 294 trading sessions.

The current Lazy Jack x3 drawdown is 14.95%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-58.9%Nov 22, 2021277Dec 28, 2022294Mar 1, 2024571
-47%Feb 20, 202022Mar 20, 202073Jul 6, 202095
-38.58%Dec 17, 202476Apr 8, 202570Jul 21, 2025146
-34.92%Aug 30, 201880Dec 24, 201877Apr 16, 2019157
-27.14%Nov 4, 201566Feb 9, 2016128Aug 11, 2016194

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 2 assets, with an effective number of assets of 1.92, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkUSFRTQQQPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.010.910.91
USFR0.011.000.010.02
TQQQ0.910.011.001.00
Portfolio0.910.021.001.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Feb 5, 2014