PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
2倍 永久组合
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


UBT 25.00%SHY 25.00%UGL 25.00%SSO 25.00%BondBondCommodityCommodityEquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in 2倍 永久组合, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Jan 21, 2010, corresponding to the inception date of UBT

Returns By Period

As of Apr 4, 2026, the 2倍 永久组合 returned 0.51% Year-To-Date and 10.64% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.11%-2.33%-3.84%-2.34%29.73%16.86%10.37%12.29%
Portfolio
2倍 永久组合
-0.74%-7.80%0.51%4.55%33.01%18.63%9.03%10.64%
UGL
ProShares Ultra Gold
-3.94%-19.31%9.85%30.77%102.31%56.26%34.59%20.29%
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500
0.17%-4.97%-8.75%-6.34%58.29%28.66%15.72%21.33%
UBT
ProShares Ultra 20+ Year Treasury
1.04%-3.30%0.09%-3.69%-10.10%-12.19%-16.92%-7.67%
SHY
iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF
0.05%-0.15%0.31%1.28%3.37%3.85%1.71%1.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Jan 22, 2010, 2倍 永久组合's average daily return is +0.05%, while the average monthly return is +0.96%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 6.0 years.

Historically, 61% of months were positive and 39% were negative. The best month was Nov 2022 with a return of +10.3%, while the worst month was Mar 2026 at -11.5%. The longest winning streak lasted 10 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 5 months.

On a daily basis, 2倍 永久组合 closed higher 55% of trading days. The best single day was Nov 10, 2022 with a return of +6.2%, while the worst single day was Jan 30, 2026 at -7.4%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20266.05%6.50%-11.47%0.52%0.51%
20254.53%2.63%1.90%0.60%0.77%3.89%-0.13%3.65%9.22%3.13%2.76%-0.38%37.43%
2024-1.60%1.34%6.15%-4.12%4.25%2.14%4.79%3.04%4.51%-1.57%1.77%-5.04%15.99%
20239.60%-6.94%8.18%0.97%-2.52%1.77%1.24%-3.42%-8.79%-0.51%10.17%7.28%15.89%
2022-5.52%0.69%-0.94%-10.05%-2.93%-5.58%4.41%-6.44%-10.79%-0.36%10.33%-3.46%-28.15%
2021-4.18%-4.48%-0.33%5.52%4.35%-0.96%4.27%1.21%-5.66%5.28%0.42%2.50%7.34%

Benchmark Metrics

2倍 永久组合 has an annualized alpha of 7.75%, beta of 0.34, and R² of 0.17 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since January 22, 2010.

  • This portfolio participates in less of S&P 500 Index's moves in both directions, but captures a larger share of gains (57.43%) than losses (40.90%) — typical of diversified or defensive assets.
  • Beta of 0.34 may look defensive, but with R² of 0.17 this portfolio is largely uncorrelated with S&P 500 Index — low beta reflects independence, not downside protection. See the Volatility section for a true picture of this portfolio's risk.
  • R² of 0.17 means this portfolio moves largely independently of S&P 500 Index — capture ratios reflect limited market correlation rather than active downside protection. Consider using a more representative benchmark.

Alpha
7.75%
Beta
0.34
0.17
Upside Capture
57.43%
Downside Capture
40.90%

Expense Ratio

2倍 永久组合 has an expense ratio of 0.73%, placing it in the medium range. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

2倍 永久组合 ranks 39 for risk / return — below 39% of portfolios on our site. The returns aren't fully compensating for the risk involved. This isn't necessarily a dealbreaker, but factor it into your decision — especially if you're risk-averse.


2倍 永久组合 Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
2倍 永久组合 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
2倍 永久组合 Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
2倍 永久组合 Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
2倍 永久组合 Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
2倍 永久组合 Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.25

0.88

+0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.68

1.37

+0.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.21

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.56

1.39

+0.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.01

6.43

-0.42


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
UGL
ProShares Ultra Gold
731.601.981.292.408.01
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500
390.721.221.181.195.03
UBT
ProShares Ultra 20+ Year Treasury
6-0.32-0.300.96-0.38-0.70
SHY
iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF
952.574.231.544.0815.52

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

2倍 永久组合 Sharpe ratios as of Apr 4, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 1.25
  • 5-Year: 0.54
  • 10-Year: 0.71
  • All Time: 0.79

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 0.99 to 1.69, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of 2倍 永久组合 compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

2倍 永久组合 provided a 2.10% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio2.10%2.19%2.32%1.68%0.52%0.11%0.35%1.03%1.01%0.68%0.49%0.68%
UGL
ProShares Ultra Gold
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500
0.81%0.68%0.85%0.18%0.50%0.18%0.20%0.50%0.75%0.39%0.51%0.63%
UBT
ProShares Ultra 20+ Year Treasury
3.88%4.26%4.50%3.54%0.30%0.00%0.26%1.50%1.55%1.37%0.75%1.56%
SHY
iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF
3.72%3.81%3.92%2.99%1.30%0.26%0.94%2.12%1.72%0.98%0.71%0.54%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the 2倍 永久组合. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the 2倍 永久组合 was 35.26%, occurring on Oct 20, 2022. Recovery took 476 trading sessions.

The current 2倍 永久组合 drawdown is 12.22%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-35.26%Nov 10, 2021238Oct 20, 2022476Sep 13, 2024714
-20.35%Mar 10, 20208Mar 19, 202028Apr 29, 202036
-16.47%Jan 30, 202639Mar 26, 2026
-15.87%Oct 5, 2012180Jun 26, 2013247Jun 19, 2014427
-14.58%Jan 26, 2015162Sep 15, 2015162May 6, 2016324

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 4 assets, with an effective number of assets of 4.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkUGLSHYUBTSSOPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.04-0.13-0.261.000.39
UGL0.041.000.310.220.040.74
SHY-0.130.311.000.59-0.130.42
UBT-0.260.220.591.00-0.250.50
SSO1.000.04-0.13-0.251.000.40
Portfolio0.390.740.420.500.401.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Jan 22, 2010