Asset Allocation
| Position | Category/Sector | Target Weight |
|---|---|---|
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | Consumer Cyclical | 54.58% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | Consumer Defensive | 2.96% |
DHR Danaher Corporation | Healthcare | 0% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | Technology | 26.40% |
TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | Healthcare | 12.17% |
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | Consumer Cyclical | 3.88% |
Performance
Performance Chart
The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Classical RG 2022, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.
Loading graphics...
The earliest data available for this chart is Jun 29, 2010, corresponding to the inception date of TSLA
Returns By Period
As of Apr 11, 2026, the Classical RG 2022 returned -0.03% Year-To-Date and 37.70% of annualized return in the last 10 years.
| 1D | 1M | YTD | 6M | 1Y | 3Y* | 5Y* | 10Y* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark S&P 500 Index | -0.11% | 2.78% | -0.42% | 4.03% | 27.10% | 18.38% | 10.55% | 12.70% |
Portfolio Classical RG 2022 | 1.66% | 9.57% | -0.03% | 5.55% | 39.11% | 44.26% | 24.81% | 37.70% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 2.02% | 14.79% | 3.28% | 10.17% | 28.94% | 33.62% | 7.17% | 22.97% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | -3.25% | -0.99% | 15.94% | 7.66% | 4.21% | 27.76% | 23.76% | 22.92% |
DHR Danaher Corporation | -1.75% | 1.44% | -17.00% | -6.02% | 1.16% | -4.54% | -1.18% | 12.25% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 2.57% | 4.65% | 1.15% | 3.00% | 70.08% | 90.83% | 67.37% | 71.10% |
TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | -0.87% | 6.84% | -14.30% | -5.30% | 13.64% | -4.58% | 0.98% | 13.62% |
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | 0.96% | -10.80% | -22.41% | -15.61% | 38.30% | 23.16% | 9.11% | 35.67% |
Monthly Returns
Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Jun 30, 2010, Classical RG 2022's average daily return is +0.14%, while the average monthly return is +2.86%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 2.0 years.
Historically, 65% of months were positive and 35% were negative. The best month was Jan 2023 with a return of +23.7%, while the worst month was Apr 2022 at -23.1%. The longest winning streak lasted 9 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 4 months.
On a daily basis, Classical RG 2022 closed higher 55% of trading days. The best single day was Apr 9, 2025 with a return of +13.5%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -9.9%.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.75% | -9.83% | -1.84% | 9.94% | -0.03% | ||||||||
| 2025 | 3.86% | -7.56% | -10.54% | -2.73% | 13.10% | 8.27% | 8.61% | -0.74% | 0.64% | 10.52% | -5.40% | 0.48% | 16.60% |
| 2024 | 7.01% | 17.13% | 5.67% | -2.92% | 7.67% | 9.00% | -1.22% | -1.96% | 3.73% | 0.84% | 8.81% | 2.81% | 71.00% |
| 2023 | 23.73% | 0.91% | 12.05% | -0.15% | 17.40% | 9.26% | 5.01% | 3.30% | -8.70% | -1.40% | 11.43% | 5.10% | 104.92% |
| 2022 | -12.38% | 0.41% | 8.67% | -23.14% | -2.19% | -11.89% | 22.81% | -9.13% | -12.07% | -2.32% | 5.66% | -12.47% | -43.86% |
| 2021 | 0.48% | -2.82% | -0.43% | 10.66% | -2.05% | 11.76% | -1.30% | 7.01% | -4.32% | 10.97% | 10.69% | -5.40% | 38.33% |
Benchmark Metrics
Classical RG 2022 has an annualized alpha of 19.72%, beta of 1.27, and R² of 0.58 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since June 30, 2010.
- This portfolio captured 197.28% of S&P 500 Index gains but only 95.57% of its losses — a favorable profile for investors.
- This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 19.72% versus S&P 500 Index — delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
- Alpha
- 19.72%
- Beta
- 1.27
- R²
- 0.58
- Upside Capture
- 197.28%
- Downside Capture
- 95.57%
Expense Ratio
Classical RG 2022 has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.
Return for Risk
Risk / Return Rank
Classical RG 2022 ranks 20 for risk / return — in the bottom 20% of portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.
Return / Risk — by metrics
| Portfolio | Benchmark | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.74 | 2.23 | -0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.38 | 3.12 | -0.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.42 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.74 | 4.05 | -1.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.23 | 17.91 | -10.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.
| Risk / Return Rank | Sharpe ratio | Sortino ratio | Omega ratio | Calmar ratio | Martin ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 60 | 1.01 | 1.59 | 1.20 | 1.83 | 4.36 |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 37 | 0.22 | 0.45 | 1.05 | 0.54 | 1.08 |
DHR Danaher Corporation | 37 | 0.20 | 0.50 | 1.06 | 0.38 | 1.08 |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 81 | 2.19 | 2.75 | 1.34 | 4.75 | 11.78 |
TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 46 | 0.55 | 1.07 | 1.12 | 0.69 | 1.76 |
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | 57 | 0.80 | 1.34 | 1.16 | 1.91 | 4.84 |
Loading graphics...
Dividends
Dividend yield
Classical RG 2022 provided a 0.06% dividend yield over the last twelve months.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portfolio | 0.06% | 0.06% | 0.06% | 0.13% | 0.08% | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.13% | 0.19% | 0.26% | 0.20% | 0.49% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||||||
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 0.52% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% |
DHR Danaher Corporation | 0.72% | 0.56% | 0.47% | 12.64% | 0.38% | 0.26% | 0.32% | 0.44% | 0.62% | 0.60% | 32.55% | 0.58% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
TMO Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 0.35% | 0.30% | 0.30% | 0.26% | 0.22% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.23% | 0.30% | 0.32% | 0.43% | 0.42% |
TSLA Tesla, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
Drawdowns Chart
The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.
Loading graphics...
Worst Drawdowns
The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Classical RG 2022. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.
The maximum drawdown for the Classical RG 2022 was 49.78%, occurring on Dec 28, 2022. Recovery took 169 trading sessions.
The current Classical RG 2022 drawdown is 7.57%.
Depth | Start | To Bottom | Bottom | To Recover | End | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -49.78% | Nov 22, 2021 | 277 | Dec 28, 2022 | 169 | Aug 31, 2023 | 446 |
| -35.87% | Oct 2, 2018 | 58 | Dec 24, 2018 | 253 | Dec 26, 2019 | 311 |
| -29.74% | Jan 24, 2025 | 60 | Apr 21, 2025 | 64 | Jul 23, 2025 | 124 |
| -27.9% | Feb 20, 2020 | 18 | Mar 16, 2020 | 22 | Apr 16, 2020 | 40 |
| -26.42% | Dec 30, 2015 | 28 | Feb 9, 2016 | 57 | May 2, 2016 | 85 |
Volatility
Volatility Chart
The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Diversification
Diversification Metrics
Number of Effective Assets
The portfolio contains 6 assets, with an effective number of assets of 2.60, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.
Asset Correlations Table
| Benchmark | TSLA | COST | DHR | TMO | NVDA | AMZN | Portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | 1.00 | 0.46 | 0.53 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.60 | 0.63 | 0.73 |
| TSLA | 0.46 | 1.00 | 0.24 | 0.28 | 0.29 | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.50 |
| COST | 0.53 | 0.24 | 1.00 | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.31 | 0.37 | 0.42 |
| DHR | 0.63 | 0.28 | 0.38 | 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.36 | 0.38 | 0.46 |
| TMO | 0.63 | 0.29 | 0.38 | 0.71 | 1.00 | 0.38 | 0.40 | 0.52 |
| NVDA | 0.60 | 0.39 | 0.31 | 0.36 | 0.38 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 0.79 |
| AMZN | 0.63 | 0.39 | 0.37 | 0.38 | 0.40 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.89 |
| Portfolio | 0.73 | 0.50 | 0.42 | 0.46 | 0.52 | 0.79 | 0.89 | 1.00 |