PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
Team 5 portfolio
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


NVDA 65.00%AAPL 15.00%LVMUY 10.00%ASML 10.00%EquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Team 5 portfolio, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Jul 13, 2007, corresponding to the inception date of LVMUY

Returns By Period

As of Apr 11, 2026, the Team 5 portfolio returned 1.22% Year-To-Date and 57.55% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
-0.11%0.61%-0.42%4.03%29.40%18.38%10.55%12.70%
Portfolio
Team 5 portfolio
1.75%1.33%1.22%7.64%68.63%63.71%49.72%57.55%
AAPL
Apple Inc
-0.00%-0.13%-4.10%6.40%37.39%18.01%14.99%26.40%
LVMUY
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne
-1.41%-2.43%-25.03%-9.13%-1.98%-13.28%-2.61%15.39%
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
2.05%6.61%38.36%58.40%130.14%32.21%19.66%32.16%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
2.57%1.40%1.15%3.00%75.40%90.83%67.37%71.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Jul 16, 2007, Team 5 portfolio's average daily return is +0.14%, while the average monthly return is +2.96%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 2.0 years.

Historically, 61% of months were positive and 39% were negative. The best month was Jan 2011 with a return of +37.4%, while the worst month was Jul 2008 at -26.4%. The longest winning streak lasted 8 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 5 months.

On a daily basis, Team 5 portfolio closed higher 54% of trading days. The best single day was Nov 11, 2016 with a return of +19.5%, while the worst single day was Jul 3, 2008 at -19.0%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20262.79%-4.29%-4.09%7.26%1.22%
2025-5.88%2.28%-11.79%-1.16%15.97%12.85%7.26%1.79%9.18%8.98%-7.25%3.29%36.74%
202416.86%21.37%9.92%-4.79%20.35%10.35%-4.30%2.08%0.97%2.36%3.34%-0.65%104.34%
202327.72%12.13%17.24%0.26%24.61%10.06%6.80%1.69%-11.29%-4.45%13.36%5.83%155.01%
2022-12.73%-2.56%8.27%-24.67%-0.33%-15.26%19.13%-13.60%-16.71%11.03%21.24%-12.26%-40.69%
20210.33%3.48%-0.09%11.08%5.80%16.98%0.59%10.22%-7.35%18.06%20.15%-5.83%95.69%

Benchmark Metrics

Team 5 portfolio has an annualized alpha of 25.36%, beta of 1.40, and R² of 0.52 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since July 16, 2007.

  • This portfolio captured 268.62% of S&P 500 Index gains and 129.13% of its losses — amplifying both gains and losses, but participating more in upside than downside.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 25.36% versus S&P 500 Index — delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.

Alpha
25.36%
Beta
1.40
0.52
Upside Capture
268.62%
Downside Capture
129.13%

Expense Ratio

Team 5 portfolio has an expense ratio of 0.00%, meaning no management fees are charged. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


The portfolio doesn't include any funds that charge management fees.

Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

Team 5 portfolio ranks 55 for risk / return — on par with similar portfolios. You're getting a typical balance of risk and reward. Not a standout, but not a red flag either — a reasonable choice if other factors align with your goals.


Team 5 portfolio Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
Team 5 portfolio Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
Team 5 portfolio Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
Team 5 portfolio Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
Team 5 portfolio Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
Team 5 portfolio Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.52

2.23

+0.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.15

3.12

+0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.42

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.69

4.05

+1.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.29

17.91

-0.62


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
AAPL
Apple Inc
761.572.321.303.759.07
LVMUY
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne
32-0.060.141.020.260.71
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
933.393.761.488.4623.19
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
832.192.751.344.7511.78

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

Team 5 portfolio Sharpe ratios as of Apr 11, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 2.52
  • 5-Year: 1.23
  • 10-Year: 1.47
  • All Time: 0.86

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 2.14 to 3.05, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio falls between the 25th and 75th percentiles. This indicates that its risk-adjusted performance is in line with the majority of portfolios, suggesting a balanced approach to risk and return—likely suitable for a wide range of investors.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of Team 5 portfolio compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

Team 5 portfolio provided a 0.39% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio0.39%0.36%0.39%0.35%0.48%0.26%0.38%0.62%0.88%0.74%1.09%2.44%
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.40%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
LVMUY
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne
2.56%1.92%2.14%1.65%1.78%0.99%1.64%1.49%2.21%2.67%4.16%12.95%
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
0.63%0.97%0.97%0.86%1.27%0.50%0.50%1.40%0.94%0.64%0.92%0.73%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Team 5 portfolio. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the Team 5 portfolio was 77.38%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 553 trading sessions.

The current Team 5 portfolio drawdown is 4.72%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-77.38%Oct 24, 2007273Nov 20, 2008553Feb 2, 2011826
-55.94%Nov 30, 2021221Oct 14, 2022148May 18, 2023369
-46.75%Oct 2, 201858Dec 24, 2018249Dec 19, 2019307
-42.58%Feb 18, 2011157Oct 3, 2011593Feb 12, 2014750
-34.4%Feb 20, 202018Mar 16, 202043May 15, 202061

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 4 assets, with an effective number of assets of 2.15, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkLVMUYAAPLASMLNVDAPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.530.620.660.600.68
LVMUY0.531.000.350.460.330.45
AAPL0.620.351.000.470.470.58
ASML0.660.460.471.000.580.68
NVDA0.600.330.470.581.000.97
Portfolio0.680.450.580.680.971.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Jul 16, 2007