PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IBKR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


IAU 20.00%VOO 50.00%AMAT 30.00%CommodityCommodityEquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in IBKR, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Sep 9, 2010, corresponding to the inception date of VOO

Returns By Period

As of Apr 2, 2026, the IBKR returned 11.23% Year-To-Date and 21.28% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.72%-4.45%-3.95%-2.02%16.73%16.96%10.34%12.24%
Portfolio
IBKR
1.81%-6.16%11.23%21.34%57.18%30.28%17.91%21.28%
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
3.51%-4.94%37.84%63.01%145.07%43.51%21.14%33.86%
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
1.72%-10.66%10.48%23.05%52.36%33.88%22.19%14.27%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
0.79%-4.29%-3.66%-1.41%18.17%18.58%11.93%14.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Sep 10, 2010, IBKR's average daily return is +0.07%, while the average monthly return is +1.50%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 3.9 years.

Historically, 64% of months were positive and 36% were negative. The best month was Nov 2020 with a return of +16.4%, while the worst month was Mar 2020 at -12.3%. The longest winning streak lasted 10 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 5 months.

On a daily basis, IBKR closed higher 55% of trading days. The best single day was Apr 9, 2025 with a return of +10.1%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -11.8%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
202610.80%6.68%-7.57%1.81%11.23%
20255.97%-4.03%-3.15%1.84%4.37%7.76%0.54%-1.01%11.57%6.06%3.86%1.12%39.55%
20240.94%9.59%3.97%-2.48%5.30%4.64%-1.41%-0.23%2.84%-2.63%1.39%-3.37%19.27%
20238.65%-0.87%5.20%-1.41%5.07%5.48%3.55%-0.75%-6.17%-0.94%8.97%5.01%35.34%
2022-6.60%-0.97%1.63%-9.65%1.21%-10.96%9.04%-6.12%-9.15%6.01%11.76%-5.97%-20.72%
20212.42%7.45%6.40%3.12%3.13%0.57%1.21%0.53%-4.36%5.65%1.88%5.10%37.85%

Benchmark Metrics

IBKR has an annualized alpha of 6.31%, beta of 0.95, and R² of 0.76 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since September 10, 2010.

  • This portfolio captured 116.73% of S&P 500 Index gains but only 89.31% of its losses — a favorable profile for investors.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 6.31% versus S&P 500 Index — delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
  • With beta of 0.95 and R² of 0.76, this portfolio moves broadly in line with S&P 500 Index — much of its variation is explained by market exposure rather than independent behavior.

Alpha
6.31%
Beta
0.95
0.76
Upside Capture
116.73%
Downside Capture
89.31%

Expense Ratio

IBKR has an expense ratio of 0.07%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

IBKR ranks 94 for risk / return — in the top 94% of portfolios on our site. This means strong returns relative to risk — exactly what professional investors look for. Well-suited for investors who want to maximize return per unit of risk.


IBKR Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
IBKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBKR Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
IBKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBKR Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.41

0.92

+1.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.11

1.41

+1.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.21

+0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.43

1.41

+3.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.97

6.61

+11.35


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
952.973.151.446.8318.96
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
861.902.331.352.729.95
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
601.011.531.231.557.31

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

IBKR Sharpe ratios as of Apr 2, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 2.41
  • 5-Year: 0.87
  • 10-Year: 1.04
  • All Time: 0.97

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.01 to 1.70, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio is in the top 25%. This signifies superior risk-adjusted performance, meaning the portfolio is delivering strong returns for the level of risk taken compared to most others.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of IBKR compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

IBKR provided a 0.75% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio0.75%0.77%0.90%0.95%1.16%0.80%1.07%1.35%1.67%1.13%1.38%1.69%
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
0.52%0.69%0.93%0.75%1.05%0.60%1.01%1.36%2.14%0.78%1.24%2.14%
IAU
iShares Gold Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.18%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the IBKR. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the IBKR was 31.59%, occurring on Oct 14, 2022. Recovery took 196 trading sessions.

The current IBKR drawdown is 7.95%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-31.59%Dec 28, 2021202Oct 14, 2022196Jul 28, 2023398
-30.74%Feb 20, 202022Mar 20, 202083Jul 20, 2020105
-25.36%Mar 12, 2018200Dec 24, 2018137Jul 12, 2019337
-20.35%Mar 3, 2015146Sep 28, 2015165May 24, 2016311
-19.71%May 2, 2011108Oct 3, 2011120Mar 26, 2012228

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 3 assets, with an effective number of assets of 2.63, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkIAUAMATVOOPortfolio
Benchmark1.000.040.661.000.84
IAU0.041.000.030.040.21
AMAT0.660.031.000.660.92
VOO1.000.040.661.000.84
Portfolio0.840.210.920.841.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Sep 10, 2010