Asset Allocation
| Position | Category/Sector | Target Weight |
|---|---|---|
AAPL Apple Inc | Technology | 50% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | S&P 500 | 50% |
Performance
Performance Chart
The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in test, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.
Loading graphics...
The earliest data available for this chart is Jan 29, 1993, corresponding to the inception date of SPY
Returns By Period
As of Apr 11, 2026, the test returned -2.10% Year-To-Date and 21.10% of annualized return in the last 10 years.
| 1D | 1M | YTD | 6M | 1Y | 3Y* | 5Y* | 10Y* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Benchmark S&P 500 Index | -0.11% | 2.16% | -0.42% | 4.03% | 27.10% | 18.38% | 10.55% | 12.70% |
Portfolio test | -0.04% | 2.06% | -2.10% | 5.54% | 31.29% | 19.72% | 14.19% | 21.10% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | -0.07% | 2.29% | -0.09% | 4.64% | 28.71% | 19.89% | 12.07% | 14.53% |
AAPL Apple Inc | -0.00% | 1.85% | -4.10% | 6.40% | 32.03% | 18.01% | 14.99% | 26.40% |
Monthly Returns
Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Feb 1, 1993, test's average daily return is +0.08%, while the average monthly return is +1.69%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 3.4 years.
Historically, 60% of months were positive and 40% were negative. The best month was Jan 2001 with a return of +25.1%, while the worst month was Sep 2000 at -32.8%. The longest winning streak lasted 7 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 6 months.
On a daily basis, test closed higher 54% of trading days. The best single day was Aug 6, 1997 with a return of +18.9%, while the worst single day was Sep 29, 2000 at -26.4%.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -1.54% | 0.48% | -4.44% | 3.56% | -2.10% | ||||||||
| 2025 | -1.53% | 0.57% | -6.80% | -2.61% | 0.53% | 3.82% | 1.73% | 7.02% | 6.79% | 4.28% | 1.74% | -1.26% | 14.27% |
| 2024 | -1.31% | 1.79% | -0.71% | -2.36% | 9.09% | 6.74% | 3.31% | 2.79% | 1.91% | -1.98% | 5.57% | 1.54% | 28.96% |
| 2023 | 8.68% | -0.04% | 7.98% | 2.25% | 2.55% | 7.98% | 2.27% | -2.93% | -6.76% | -1.21% | 10.27% | 2.93% | 37.84% |
| 2022 | -3.42% | -4.20% | 4.76% | -9.24% | -2.59% | -8.21% | 14.01% | -3.58% | -10.71% | 9.53% | 1.10% | -8.85% | -22.08% |
| 2021 | -0.79% | -2.57% | 2.81% | 6.46% | -2.25% | 6.03% | 4.47% | 3.63% | -5.76% | 6.44% | 4.83% | 6.10% | 32.45% |
Benchmark Metrics
test has an annualized alpha of 10.72%, beta of 1.07, and R² of 0.53 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since February 01, 1993.
- This portfolio captured 145.48% of S&P 500 Index gains but only 98.86% of its losses — a favorable profile for investors.
- This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 10.72% versus S&P 500 Index — delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
- With beta of 1.07 and R² of 0.53, this portfolio moves broadly in line with S&P 500 Index — much of its variation is explained by market exposure rather than independent behavior.
- Alpha
- 10.72%
- Beta
- 1.07
- R²
- 0.53
- Upside Capture
- 145.48%
- Downside Capture
- 98.86%
Expense Ratio
test has an expense ratio of 0.05%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.
Return for Risk
Risk / Return Rank
test ranks 46 for risk / return — on par with similar portfolios. You're getting a typical balance of risk and reward. Not a standout, but not a red flag either — a reasonable choice if other factors align with your goals.
Return / Risk — by metrics
| Portfolio | Benchmark | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.11 | 2.23 | -0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.04 | 3.12 | -0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.42 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.40 | 4.05 | +0.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.74 | 17.91 | -3.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.
| Risk / Return Rank | Sharpe ratio | Sortino ratio | Omega ratio | Calmar ratio | Martin ratio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 66 | 2.35 | 3.26 | 1.44 | 4.32 | 18.78 |
AAPL Apple Inc | 75 | 1.57 | 2.32 | 1.30 | 3.75 | 9.07 |
Loading graphics...
Dividends
Dividend yield
test provided a 0.74% dividend yield over the last twelve months.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portfolio | 0.74% | 0.72% | 0.80% | 0.94% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 1.07% | 1.39% | 1.91% | 1.63% | 1.98% | 2.00% |
| Portfolio components: | ||||||||||||
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.09% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
AAPL Apple Inc | 0.40% | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.49% | 0.70% | 0.49% | 0.61% | 1.04% | 1.79% | 1.45% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
Drawdowns
Drawdowns Chart
The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.
Loading graphics...
Worst Drawdowns
The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the test. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.
The maximum drawdown for the test was 60.12%, occurring on Oct 9, 2002. Recovery took 520 trading sessions.
The current test drawdown is 4.51%.
Depth | Start | To Bottom | Bottom | To Recover | End | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -60.12% | Mar 23, 2000 | 639 | Oct 9, 2002 | 520 | Nov 2, 2004 | 1159 |
| -54.31% | Dec 27, 2007 | 301 | Mar 9, 2009 | 254 | Mar 11, 2010 | 555 |
| -34.75% | Jul 18, 1995 | 253 | Jul 16, 1996 | 268 | Aug 6, 1997 | 521 |
| -34.14% | Feb 2, 1993 | 174 | Oct 8, 1993 | 399 | May 9, 1995 | 573 |
| -33.72% | Aug 8, 1997 | 96 | Dec 23, 1997 | 47 | Mar 4, 1998 | 143 |
Volatility
Volatility Chart
The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Diversification
Diversification Metrics
Number of Effective Assets
The portfolio contains 2 assets, with an effective number of assets of 2.00, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.
Asset Correlations Table
| Benchmark | AAPL | SPY | Portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benchmark | 1.00 | 0.52 | 0.98 | 0.72 |
| AAPL | 0.52 | 1.00 | 0.52 | 0.95 |
| SPY | 0.98 | 0.52 | 1.00 | 0.71 |
| Portfolio | 0.72 | 0.95 | 0.71 | 1.00 |