PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
帮你投50
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


TLT 45.00%GC=F 5.00%SPY 20.00%MCHI 15.00%QQQ 10.00%VGK 5.00%BondBondCommodityCommodityEquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right asset allocation for 帮你投50

Add portfolio to the optimizer to find optimal allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in 帮你投50, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading charts...

Returns By Period


Position1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
-0.26%-0.17%7.91%7.98%22.99%19.77%11.75%13.42%
Portfolio
帮你投50
0.16%-1.41%2.09%1.76%11.18%8.44%
GC=F
Gold Futures
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
0.69%-6.89%-9.61%-10.41%-0.02%8.57%-6.07%4.50%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
-1.15%-0.48%15.37%13.53%34.02%26.66%16.47%21.45%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
-0.29%-0.08%8.38%8.52%24.32%21.23%13.25%15.24%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
0.59%-0.73%-0.49%-1.03%4.17%-1.86%-6.70%-1.79%
VGK
Vanguard FTSE Europe ETF
0.41%-0.27%5.60%9.21%16.77%16.40%8.15%9.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Jan 31, 2022, 帮你投50's average daily return is +0.01%, while the average monthly return is +0.23%. At this rate, an investment would double in approximately 25.1 years.

Historically, 56% of months were positive and 44% were negative. The best month was Nov 2022 with a return of +9.9%, while the worst month was Sep 2022 at -9.2%. The longest winning streak lasted 6 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 5 months.

On a daily basis, 帮你投50 closed higher 53% of trading days. The best single day was Nov 10, 2022 with a return of +4.7%, while the worst single day was Jun 13, 2022 at -3.4%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20261.22%0.99%-4.47%4.03%2.03%-1.50%2.09%
20251.79%3.84%-2.04%-1.21%1.35%3.85%0.70%1.74%4.11%1.09%-0.23%-1.39%14.20%
2024-2.13%1.68%1.65%-3.46%3.96%1.42%1.59%1.83%4.77%-3.48%1.98%-3.27%6.27%
20238.15%-4.44%4.65%0.09%-2.06%2.84%1.74%-3.65%-5.75%-3.77%8.14%5.41%10.50%
20221.22%-2.73%-2.55%-8.47%-0.60%-2.32%2.77%-3.85%-9.16%-2.71%9.85%-2.94%-20.61%

Benchmark Metrics

帮你投50 has an annualized alpha of -4.17%, beta of 0.52, and R2 of 0.53 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since January 31, 2022.

  • This portfolio participated in 86.58% of S&P 500 Index downside but only 51.27% of its upside - more exposed to losses than it benefited from rallies.
  • This portfolio had an annualized alpha of -4.17% versus S&P 500 Index - delivering less than market exposure alone would predict.
  • Beta of 0.52 indicates this portfolio moves significantly less than S&P 500 Index - a genuinely defensive profile with reduced participation in both market rallies and downturns.

Alpha
-4.17%
Beta
0.52
0.53
Upside Capture
51.27%
Downside Capture
86.58%

Expense Ratio

帮你投50 has an expense ratio of 0.20%, which is considered low. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

帮你投50 ranks 18 for risk / return — in the bottom 18% of Portfolios on our site. This means you're taking on significantly more risk than the returns justify. Consider whether the potential upside is worth the volatility, or explore alternatives with better risk / return profiles.


帮你投50 Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
帮你投50 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
帮你投50 Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
帮你投50 Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
帮你投50 Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
帮你投50 Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics

The table below presents risk-adjusted performance metrics for 帮你投50 and compares them with S&P 500 Index.


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

1.28

1.90

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

1.83

2.58

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.35

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

2.54

-0.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.40

11.58

-6.18


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

PositionRisk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
GC=F
Gold Futures
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
9-0.000.141.02-0.00-0.00
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
672.042.651.362.8610.81
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
692.022.731.372.7512.62
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
160.440.701.080.551.35
VGK
Vanguard FTSE Europe ETF
331.081.591.191.395.15

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

帮你投50 Sharpe ratios as of Jun 10, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 1.28
  • All Time: 0.15

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 1.54 to 2.39, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio places it in the bottom 25%. This suggests weaker risk-adjusted returns than most portfolios, possibly due to lower returns, higher volatility, or both. It may be worth reviewing the allocation. You can use the Portfolio Optimization tool to explore options for improving the Sharpe ratio.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of 帮你投50 compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading charts...

Dividends

Dividend yield

帮你投50 provided a 2.80% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio2.80%2.71%2.76%2.42%2.04%1.27%1.30%1.83%2.12%1.91%2.11%2.26%
GC=F
Gold Futures
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
2.34%2.12%2.31%2.66%1.78%1.04%1.04%1.45%1.60%1.56%1.66%2.76%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.40%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.00%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%
TLT
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
4.60%4.43%4.30%3.38%2.67%1.50%1.50%2.27%2.63%2.43%2.60%2.61%
VGK
Vanguard FTSE Europe ETF
2.82%2.86%3.61%3.15%3.25%3.05%2.11%3.27%3.95%2.70%3.52%3.25%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading charts...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the 帮你投50. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the 帮你投50 was 28.35%, occurring on Oct 24, 2022. Recovery took 691 trading sessions.

The current 帮你投50 drawdown is 2.33%.


Related event

Drawdown

Fall

Recovery

Underwater

Bear market2022
-28.35%Oct 2022
8mo 23d2y 9mo
3y 5moFeb 2022 - Jul 2025
2026 pullback2026
-7.13%Mar 2026
4mo 29d1mo 10d
6mo 9dOct 2025 - May 2026
2026 pullback2026
-2.49%Jun 2026
5d
7d 23hJun 2026 - now
2026 pullback2026
-2.30%May 2026
8d10d
18dMay 2026 - May 2026
2025 pullback2025
-1.60%Oct 2025
7d10d
17dOct 2025 - Oct 2025

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 6 assets, with an effective number of assets of 3.57, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. Your allocation shows noticeable concentration: a few holdings carry significantly more weight than the rest. Rebalancing toward more even weights — or adding less correlated assets — could reduce risk.


Diversification Ratio
1Y
3Y
All Time
Diversification Ratio

1.40

1.47

1.49

The portfolio has a diversification ratio of 1.49, in line with the typical range across portfolios. There's room to improve by adding less correlated assets.

帮你投50 correlation to the S&P 500 Index

帮你投50 has a 0.77 correlation to S&P 500 Index over the trailing 12 months. This section compares each holding's correlation to the benchmark and to the portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022

0.70


Benchmark Correlations

Correlation vs. S&P 500 Index. SPY has the highest benchmark correlation at 1.00, while GC=F has the lowest at -0.05.

GC=F
-0.05
TLT
0.12
MCHI
0.43
VGK
0.73
QQQ
0.94
SPY
1.00

Portfolio Correlations

Correlation vs. 帮你投50. SPY has the highest portfolio correlation at 0.70, while GC=F has the lowest at -0.02.

GC=F
-0.02
MCHI
0.61
TLT
0.64
QQQ
0.68
VGK
0.69
SPY
0.70

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Jan 31, 2022
Diversification Analysis

Find what 帮你投50 is missing

See which holdings overlap, where 帮你投50 is concentrated, and which low-correlation assets could fill the gaps.

Analyze Diversification