PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
Full Stack- 1
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Diversification

Asset Allocation


BTAL 20.00%VONG 26.67%IDMO 26.67%VONV 26.67%AlternativesAlternativesEquityEquity

S&P 500 Index

Performance

Performance Chart

The chart shows the growth of an initial investment of $10,000 in Full Stack- 1, comparing it to the performance of the S&P 500 index or another benchmark. All prices have been adjusted for splits and dividends. The portfolio is rebalanced Every 3 months.


Loading graphics...

The earliest data available for this chart is Feb 24, 2012, corresponding to the inception date of IDMO

Returns By Period

As of Apr 3, 2026, the Full Stack- 1 returned -1.81% Year-To-Date and 10.59% of annualized return in the last 10 years.


1D1MYTD6M1Y3Y*5Y*10Y*
Benchmark
S&P 500 Index
0.11%-4.18%-3.84%-1.98%21.98%16.86%10.37%12.29%
Portfolio
Full Stack- 1
0.05%-3.19%-1.81%-0.68%12.43%14.31%10.16%10.59%
BTAL
AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund
1.23%-0.99%-2.85%-8.42%-33.22%-8.40%-1.47%-3.19%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
-0.01%-4.93%-8.98%-8.25%24.87%21.43%12.55%16.78%
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
-0.89%-3.62%1.06%5.63%32.53%22.78%14.31%11.76%
VONV
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
0.25%-3.09%2.89%6.12%21.18%14.36%9.34%10.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Monthly Returns

Based on dividend-adjusted daily data since Feb 27, 2012, Full Stack- 1's average daily return is +0.04%, while the average monthly return is +0.82%. At this rate, your investment would double in approximately 7.1 years.

Historically, 67% of months were positive and 33% were negative. The best month was Apr 2020 with a return of +8.4%, while the worst month was Mar 2020 at -7.6%. The longest winning streak lasted 14 consecutive months, and the longest losing streak was 3 months.

On a daily basis, Full Stack- 1 closed higher 56% of trading days. The best single day was Mar 24, 2020 with a return of +6.3%, while the worst single day was Mar 16, 2020 at -8.0%.


JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
20261.65%0.62%-4.97%1.02%-1.81%
20252.66%1.46%-1.22%0.64%4.19%2.24%-0.36%2.06%2.03%-0.53%0.80%0.99%15.90%
20243.03%3.88%3.36%-2.49%3.65%2.04%1.18%2.62%0.14%-0.85%3.43%-2.42%18.70%
20233.37%-1.92%2.80%1.89%-2.11%3.86%1.81%-0.18%-1.73%-0.71%6.33%1.91%16.02%
2022-3.31%-3.45%3.02%-4.58%1.30%-5.26%4.51%-3.50%-6.72%6.71%5.33%-2.51%-9.21%
2021-0.19%-1.03%2.03%3.58%-0.13%1.99%1.98%2.59%-3.04%4.84%-1.26%4.20%16.35%

Benchmark Metrics

Full Stack- 1 has an annualized alpha of 2.58%, beta of 0.60, and R² of 0.79 versus S&P 500 Index. Calculated based on daily prices since February 27, 2012.

  • This portfolio participates in less of S&P 500 Index's moves in both directions, but captures a larger share of gains (68.30%) than losses (67.11%) — typical of diversified or defensive assets.
  • This portfolio generated an annualized alpha of 2.58% versus S&P 500 Index — delivering returns beyond what market exposure alone would predict.
  • Beta of 0.60 indicates this portfolio moves significantly less than S&P 500 Index — a genuinely defensive profile with reduced participation in both market rallies and downturns.

Alpha
2.58%
Beta
0.60
0.79
Upside Capture
68.30%
Downside Capture
67.11%

Expense Ratio

Full Stack- 1 has an expense ratio of 0.53%, placing it in the medium range. Below, you can find the expense ratios of the portfolio's funds side by side and easily compare their relative costs.


Return for Risk

Risk / Return Rank

Full Stack- 1 ranks 20 for risk / return — below 20% of portfolios on our site. The returns aren't fully compensating for the risk involved. This isn't necessarily a dealbreaker, but factor it into your decision — especially if you're risk-averse.


Full Stack- 1 Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
Full Stack- 1 Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
Full Stack- 1 Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
Full Stack- 1 Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
Full Stack- 1 Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
Full Stack- 1 Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

Return / Risk — by metrics


PortfolioBenchmarkDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.86

0.88

-0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.28

1.37

-0.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.21

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

1.39

-0.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.52

6.43

-0.92


How much return does each position deliver for the risk it carries? Higher values mean better reward for the risk taken.

Risk / Return RankSharpe ratioSortino ratioOmega ratioCalmar ratioMartin ratio
BTAL
AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund
1-1.32-1.980.79-0.89-1.20
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
380.801.301.181.153.86
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
771.542.141.322.489.91
VONV
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
511.021.471.221.416.55

Sharpe Ratio

The Sharpe ratio helps investors understand how much return they're getting for the level of risk taken. A higher Sharpe ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance, meaning more reward for each unit of risk.

Full Stack- 1 Sharpe ratios as of Apr 3, 2026 (values are recalculated daily):

  • 1-Year: 0.86
  • 5-Year: 0.94
  • 10-Year: 0.90
  • All Time: 0.88

These values reflect how efficiently the investment has delivered returns relative to its volatility over different time periods. All figures are annualized and based on daily total returns (including price changes and dividends).

Compared to the broad market, where average Sharpe ratios range from 0.98 to 1.66, this portfolio's current Sharpe ratio places it in the bottom 25%. This suggests weaker risk-adjusted returns than most portfolios, possibly due to lower returns, higher volatility, or both. It may be worth reviewing the allocation. You can use the Portfolio Optimization tool to explore options for improving the Sharpe ratio.

The chart below shows the rolling Sharpe ratio of Full Stack- 1 compared to the selected benchmark. This view highlights how the investment's risk-adjusted performance has changed over time.


Loading graphics...

Dividends

Dividend yield

Full Stack- 1 provided a 2.13% dividend yield over the last twelve months.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
Portfolio2.13%2.09%1.97%2.75%2.03%1.08%1.24%1.81%1.95%1.72%1.61%1.70%
BTAL
AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund
2.56%2.49%3.49%6.14%1.01%0.00%0.00%0.88%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VONG
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF
0.50%0.45%0.55%0.71%0.98%0.58%0.77%1.03%1.18%1.19%1.48%1.47%
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
3.77%3.71%2.24%2.89%3.66%1.81%1.63%2.78%3.27%3.08%2.18%2.52%
VONV
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value ETF
1.81%1.82%1.97%2.10%2.22%1.67%2.25%2.30%2.56%2.18%2.39%2.38%

Drawdowns

Drawdowns Chart

The Drawdowns chart displays portfolio losses from any high point along the way. Drawdowns are calculated considering price movements and all distributions paid, if any.


Loading graphics...

Worst Drawdowns

The table below displays the maximum drawdowns of the Full Stack- 1. A maximum drawdown is a measure of risk, indicating the largest reduction in portfolio value due to a series of losing trades.

The maximum drawdown for the Full Stack- 1 was 25.18%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 76 trading sessions.

The current Full Stack- 1 drawdown is 4.07%.


Depth

Start

To Bottom

Bottom

To Recover

End

Total

-25.18%Feb 20, 202023Mar 23, 202076Jul 10, 202099
-17.46%Jan 5, 2022186Sep 30, 2022239Sep 14, 2023425
-14.73%Apr 27, 2015202Feb 11, 2016255Feb 15, 2017457
-13.35%Sep 28, 201860Dec 24, 201859Mar 21, 2019119
-9.85%Mar 6, 202524Apr 8, 202517May 2, 202541

Volatility

Volatility Chart

The chart below shows the rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Diversification

Diversification Metrics


Number of Effective Assets

The portfolio contains 4 assets, with an effective number of assets of 3.95, reflecting the diversification based on asset allocation. This number of effective assets suggests a highly concentrated portfolio, where a few assets dominate the allocation, potentially increasing the portfolio's risk due to lack of diversification.

Asset Correlations Table

The table below displays the correlation coefficients between the individual components of the portfolio, the entire portfolio, and the chosen benchmark.

BenchmarkBTALIDMOVONVVONGPortfolio
Benchmark1.00-0.520.530.890.940.84
BTAL-0.521.00-0.30-0.51-0.48-0.25
IDMO0.53-0.301.000.490.510.78
VONV0.89-0.510.491.000.730.77
VONG0.94-0.480.510.731.000.81
Portfolio0.84-0.250.780.770.811.00
The correlation results are calculated based on daily price changes starting from Feb 27, 2012