PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ZWB.TO vs. XYLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


ZWB.TOXYLD
YTD Return17.98%15.98%
1Y Return31.12%19.15%
3Y Return (Ann)3.90%4.76%
5Y Return (Ann)7.92%6.67%
10Y Return (Ann)7.43%6.86%
Sharpe Ratio3.392.81
Sortino Ratio4.753.81
Omega Ratio1.671.74
Calmar Ratio1.513.03
Martin Ratio17.4224.47
Ulcer Index1.80%0.79%
Daily Std Dev9.26%6.88%
Max Drawdown-39.36%-33.46%
Current Drawdown0.00%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between ZWB.TO and XYLD is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

ZWB.TO vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, ZWB.TO achieves a 17.98% return, which is significantly higher than XYLD's 15.98% return. Over the past 10 years, ZWB.TO has outperformed XYLD with an annualized return of 7.43%, while XYLD has yielded a comparatively lower 6.86% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
11.05%
9.68%
ZWB.TO
XYLD

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ZWB.TO vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZWB.TO has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


ZWB.TO
BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF
Expense ratio chart for ZWB.TO: current value at 0.71% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.71%
Expense ratio chart for XYLD: current value at 0.60% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.60%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ZWB.TO vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB.TO) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZWB.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ZWB.TO, currently valued at 2.27, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.27
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ZWB.TO, currently valued at 3.18, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.18
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ZWB.TO, currently valued at 1.42, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.42
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ZWB.TO, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.02
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ZWB.TO, currently valued at 10.59, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0010.59
XYLD
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XYLD, currently valued at 2.78, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.78
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XYLD, currently valued at 3.77, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.77
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XYLD, currently valued at 1.74, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.74
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XYLD, currently valued at 3.01, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.01
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XYLD, currently valued at 24.19, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0024.19

ZWB.TO vs. XYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZWB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.39, which is comparable to the XYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZWB.TO and XYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.503.003.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.27
2.78
ZWB.TO
XYLD

Dividends

ZWB.TO vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison

ZWB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.66%, less than XYLD's 9.09% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
ZWB.TO
BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF
6.66%7.62%7.30%5.46%5.80%5.53%5.59%4.80%5.04%5.64%4.77%5.23%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
9.09%10.51%13.44%9.08%7.93%5.76%7.12%4.67%3.24%4.65%4.15%2.49%

Drawdowns

ZWB.TO vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZWB.TO drawdown since its inception was -39.36%, which is greater than XYLD's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZWB.TO and XYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-5.35%
0
ZWB.TO
XYLD

Volatility

ZWB.TO vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison

BMO Covered Call Canadian Banks ETF (ZWB.TO) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) have volatilities of 2.27% and 2.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.27%
2.34%
ZWB.TO
XYLD