PortfoliosLab logo
ZURVY vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ZURVY and ^GSPC is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

ZURVY vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zurich Insurance Group Ltd (ZURVY) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ZURVY:

1.88

^GSPC:

0.64

Sortino Ratio

ZURVY:

2.58

^GSPC:

1.09

Omega Ratio

ZURVY:

1.41

^GSPC:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

ZURVY:

3.51

^GSPC:

0.72

Martin Ratio

ZURVY:

13.05

^GSPC:

2.74

Ulcer Index

ZURVY:

3.01%

^GSPC:

4.95%

Daily Std Dev

ZURVY:

18.69%

^GSPC:

19.62%

Max Drawdown

ZURVY:

-80.60%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

ZURVY:

-3.27%

^GSPC:

-3.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZURVY achieves a 17.41% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 1.30% return. Over the past 10 years, ZURVY has outperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 13.71%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively lower 10.87% annualized return.


ZURVY

YTD

17.41%

1M

1.78%

6M

17.06%

1Y

34.03%

5Y*

24.16%

10Y*

13.71%

^GSPC

YTD

1.30%

1M

12.79%

6M

1.49%

1Y

12.35%

5Y*

15.37%

10Y*

10.87%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ZURVY vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZURVY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ZURVY is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ZURVY is 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ZURVY is 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ZURVY is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ZURVY is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ZURVY is 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 7272
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ZURVY vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zurich Insurance Group Ltd (ZURVY) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ZURVY Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZURVY and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Drawdowns

ZURVY vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZURVY drawdown since its inception was -80.60%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZURVY and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

ZURVY vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Zurich Insurance Group Ltd (ZURVY) and S&P 500 (^GSPC) have volatilities of 5.56% and 5.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...