ZUMZ vs. CRTO
ZUMZ (Zumiez Inc.) and CRTO (Criteo S.A.) are both stocks. ZUMZ operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical), while CRTO operates in Advertising Agencies (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, ZUMZ returned 2.08%/yr vs -8.98%/yr for CRTO. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ZUMZ vs. CRTO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZUMZ achieves a -30.90% return, which is significantly lower than CRTO's -15.77% return. Over the past 10 years, ZUMZ has outperformed CRTO with an annualized return of 2.08%, while CRTO has yielded a comparatively lower -8.98% annualized return.
ZUMZ
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- -24.84%
- YTD
- -30.90%
- 6M
- -35.02%
- 1Y
- 41.29%
- 3Y*
- 2.18%
- 5Y*
- -17.62%
- 10Y*
- 2.08%
CRTO
- 1D
- 4.77%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- -15.77%
- 6M
- -14.86%
- 1Y
- -26.69%
- 3Y*
- -19.38%
- 5Y*
- -16.79%
- 10Y*
- -8.98%
ZUMZ vs. CRTO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZUMZ Zumiez Inc. | -30.90% | 35.89% | -5.75% | -6.44% | -54.70% | 30.48% | 6.49% | 80.18% | -7.95% | -4.69% |
CRTO Criteo S.A. | -15.77% | -47.90% | 56.24% | -2.84% | -32.96% | 89.52% | 18.35% | -23.72% | -12.72% | -36.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZUMZ and CRTO is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2013 | 0.21 |
The correlation between ZUMZ and CRTO shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ZUMZ:
$291.69M
CRTO:
$884.77M
ZUMZ:
$0.86
CRTO:
$2.15
ZUMZ:
20.82
CRTO:
8.08
ZUMZ:
0.32
CRTO:
0.49
ZUMZ:
0.95
CRTO:
0.78
ZUMZ:
$938.06M
CRTO:
$1.92B
ZUMZ:
$338.56M
CRTO:
$1.04B
ZUMZ:
$39.31M
CRTO:
$269.43M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZUMZ vs. CRTO — Risk / Return Rank
ZUMZ
CRTO
ZUMZ vs. CRTO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zumiez Inc. (ZUMZ) and Criteo S.A. (CRTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZUMZ | CRTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.92 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | -0.74 | +1.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.44 | -1.30 | +3.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZUMZ vs. CRTO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZUMZ drawdown since its inception was -88.06%, roughly equal to the maximum CRTO drawdown of -89.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZUMZ and CRTO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZUMZ | CRTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.06% | -89.17% | +1.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.47% | -36.36% | -7.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.22% | -68.06% | +7.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.80% | -68.06% | -10.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.80% | -88.48% | +9.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.05% | -70.53% | +3.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.83% | -46.20% | -2.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.98% | 20.56% | -3.58% |
Volatility
ZUMZ vs. CRTO - Volatility Comparison
Zumiez Inc. (ZUMZ) has a higher volatility of 33.32% compared to Criteo S.A. (CRTO) at 15.60%. This indicates that ZUMZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRTO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZUMZ | CRTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 33.32% | 15.60% | +17.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.83% | 37.20% | +6.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.66% | 43.14% | +11.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.26% | 43.73% | +8.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.68% | 48.26% | +3.42% |
Dividends
ZUMZ vs. CRTO - Dividend Comparison
Neither ZUMZ nor CRTO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
ZUMZ vs. CRTO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Zumiez Inc. and Criteo S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ZUMZ vs. CRTO - Profitability Comparison
ZUMZ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zumiez Inc. reported a gross profit of 61.34M and revenue of 193.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.7%.
CRTO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Criteo S.A. reported a gross profit of 222.74M and revenue of 424.64M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.5%.
ZUMZ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zumiez Inc. reported an operating income of -15.19M and revenue of 193.35M, resulting in an operating margin of -7.9%.
CRTO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Criteo S.A. reported an operating income of 10.40M and revenue of 424.64M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.5%.
ZUMZ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zumiez Inc. reported a net income of -13.27M and revenue of 193.35M, resulting in a net margin of -6.9%.
CRTO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Criteo S.A. reported a net income of 8.58M and revenue of 424.64M, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ZUMZ and CRTO have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZUMZ has higher volatility (33.32%) compared to CRTO (15.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZUMZ dropped -88.06% vs CRTO's -89.17%.
ZUMZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.76 vs -0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZUMZ and CRTO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer