PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZUMZ vs. BKE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ZUMZ vs. BKE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zumiez Inc. (ZUMZ) and The Buckle, Inc. (BKE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZUMZ achieves a -10.75% return, which is significantly higher than BKE's -11.45% return. Over the past 10 years, ZUMZ has underperformed BKE with an annualized return of 4.89%, while BKE has yielded a comparatively higher 15.81% annualized return.


ZUMZ

1D
-0.30%
1M
-4.60%
YTD
-10.75%
6M
-11.23%
1Y
91.99%
3Y*
14.55%
5Y*
-12.19%
10Y*
4.89%

BKE

1D
1.08%
1M
-20.12%
YTD
-11.45%
6M
-15.92%
1Y
12.51%
3Y*
20.57%
5Y*
9.78%
10Y*
15.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZUMZ vs. BKE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZUMZ
Zumiez Inc.
-10.75%35.89%-5.75%-6.44%-54.70%30.48%6.49%80.18%-7.95%-4.69%
BKE
The Buckle, Inc.
-11.45%13.95%17.49%15.02%10.91%49.40%25.01%55.19%-7.63%15.42%

Correlation

The correlation between ZUMZ and BKE is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2005

0.52

The correlation between ZUMZ and BKE shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ZUMZ:

$401.02M

BKE:

$2.25B

EPS

ZUMZ:

$0.79

BKE:

$4.36

PE Ratio

ZUMZ:

29.31

BKE:

10.13

PS Ratio

ZUMZ:

0.42

BKE:

1.71

PB Ratio

ZUMZ:

1.24

BKE:

4.91

Total Revenue (TTM)

ZUMZ:

$929.06M

BKE:

$1.31B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ZUMZ:

$332.54M

BKE:

$642.36M

EBITDA (TTM)

ZUMZ:

$17.04M

BKE:

$292.93M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZUMZ vs. BKE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZUMZ
ZUMZ Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ZUMZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZUMZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZUMZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
ZUMZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZUMZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

BKE
BKE Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
BKE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKE Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
BKE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKE Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZUMZ vs. BKE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zumiez Inc. (ZUMZ) and The Buckle, Inc. (BKE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZUMZBKEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.91

0.43

+1.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.58

0.77

+1.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.10

+0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

0.53

+2.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.00

1.46

+4.54

ZUMZ vs. BKE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZUMZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the BKE Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZUMZ and BKE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZUMZBKEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

0.43

+1.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.24

0.27

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

0.36

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.33

-0.28

Drawdowns

ZUMZ vs. BKE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZUMZ drawdown since its inception was -88.06%, which is greater than BKE's maximum drawdown of -71.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZUMZ and BKE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZUMZBKEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.06%

-71.08%

-16.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.87%

-23.50%

-8.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.22%

-33.91%

-26.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.80%

-48.89%

-29.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.80%

-53.20%

-25.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.44%

-22.68%

-34.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.80%

-27.71%

-21.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.35%

8.59%

+5.76%

Volatility

ZUMZ vs. BKE - Volatility Comparison

Zumiez Inc. (ZUMZ) has a higher volatility of 15.88% compared to The Buckle, Inc. (BKE) at 13.35%. This indicates that ZUMZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZUMZBKEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.88%

13.35%

+2.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.23%

21.97%

+11.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.54%

29.26%

+19.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.88%

36.28%

+14.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.93%

43.67%

+7.26%

Dividends

ZUMZ vs. BKE - Dividend Comparison

ZUMZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BKE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.97%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKE
The Buckle, Inc.
9.97%7.30%7.68%8.52%2.32%3.17%14.21%7.40%14.22%8.42%8.77%11.99%
ZUMZ
Zumiez Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ZUMZ vs. BKE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Zumiez Inc. and The Buckle, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
291.31M
288.74M
(ZUMZ) Total Revenue
(BKE) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ZUMZ vs. BKE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Zumiez Inc. and The Buckle, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
38.2%
46.2%
Portfolio components
ZUMZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zumiez Inc. reported a gross profit of 111.40M and revenue of 291.31M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.2%.

BKE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Buckle, Inc. reported a gross profit of 133.48M and revenue of 288.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.2%.

ZUMZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zumiez Inc. reported an operating income of 24.53M and revenue of 291.31M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.4%.

BKE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Buckle, Inc. reported an operating income of 59.45M and revenue of 288.74M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.6%.

ZUMZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zumiez Inc. reported a net income of 19.55M and revenue of 291.31M, resulting in a net margin of 6.7%.

BKE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Buckle, Inc. reported a net income of 46.88M and revenue of 288.74M, resulting in a net margin of 16.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ZUMZ and BKE have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZUMZ has higher volatility (15.88%) compared to BKE (13.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZUMZ dropped -88.06% vs BKE's -71.08%.

ZUMZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZUMZ and BKE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer