ZPRR.DE vs. USML.L
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (ZPRR.DE) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF A (USML.L).
ZPRR.DE and USML.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZPRR.DE is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000®. It was launched on Jun 30, 2014. USML.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 TR USD. It was launched on Jan 29, 2019. Both ZPRR.DE and USML.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ZPRR.DE or USML.L.
Correlation
The correlation between ZPRR.DE and USML.L is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ZPRR.DE vs. USML.L - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ZPRR.DE:
1.02
USML.L:
0.62
ZPRR.DE:
1.62
USML.L:
1.02
ZPRR.DE:
1.20
USML.L:
1.12
ZPRR.DE:
1.69
USML.L:
0.99
ZPRR.DE:
4.37
USML.L:
2.67
ZPRR.DE:
4.57%
USML.L:
4.47%
ZPRR.DE:
19.97%
USML.L:
19.46%
ZPRR.DE:
-41.20%
USML.L:
-42.65%
ZPRR.DE:
-5.76%
USML.L:
-9.33%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZPRR.DE achieves a 3.22% return, which is significantly higher than USML.L's -0.50% return.
ZPRR.DE
3.22%
3.67%
16.86%
19.98%
8.10%
9.76%
USML.L
-0.50%
2.50%
6.01%
11.57%
9.46%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZPRR.DE vs. USML.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZPRR.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than USML.L's 0.14% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ZPRR.DE vs. USML.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ZPRR.DE
USML.L
ZPRR.DE vs. USML.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (ZPRR.DE) and Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF A (USML.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ZPRR.DE vs. USML.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ZPRR.DE nor USML.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
ZPRR.DE vs. USML.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZPRR.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.20%, roughly equal to the maximum USML.L drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPRR.DE and USML.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ZPRR.DE vs. USML.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR Russell 2000 US Small Cap UCITS ETF (ZPRR.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.82% compared to Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF A (USML.L) at 4.30%. This indicates that ZPRR.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USML.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.