ZPDX.DE vs. IESG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR STOXX Europe 600 SRI UCITS ETF (ZPDX.DE) and iShares MSCI Europe SRI UCITS ETF (IESG.L).
ZPDX.DE and IESG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZPDX.DE is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the STOXX® Europe 600 SRI. It was launched on Sep 30, 2019. IESG.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Europe SRI Select Reduced Fossil Fuel Index. It was launched on Feb 25, 2011. Both ZPDX.DE and IESG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ZPDX.DE or IESG.L.
Key characteristics
| ZPDX.DE | IESG.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 9.90% | 0.46% |
| 1Y Return | 18.80% | 7.57% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 5.02% | 0.63% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 7.89% | 6.46% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.61 | 0.59 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.20 | 0.88 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.29 | 1.10 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.18 | 0.72 |
| Martin Ratio | 8.42 | 2.15 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.08% | 2.91% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.91% | 10.70% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.97% | -25.95% |
| Current Drawdown | -5.48% | -8.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZPDX.DE and IESG.L is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ZPDX.DE vs. IESG.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ZPDX.DE achieves a 9.90% return, which is significantly higher than IESG.L's 0.46% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZPDX.DE vs. IESG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZPDX.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IESG.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ZPDX.DE vs. IESG.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR STOXX Europe 600 SRI UCITS ETF (ZPDX.DE) and iShares MSCI Europe SRI UCITS ETF (IESG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ZPDX.DE vs. IESG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ZPDX.DE nor IESG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZPDX.DE SPDR STOXX Europe 600 SRI UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IESG.L iShares MSCI Europe SRI UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.59% |
Drawdowns
ZPDX.DE vs. IESG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZPDX.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.97%, which is greater than IESG.L's maximum drawdown of -25.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZPDX.DE and IESG.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ZPDX.DE vs. IESG.L - Volatility Comparison
SPDR STOXX Europe 600 SRI UCITS ETF (ZPDX.DE) and iShares MSCI Europe SRI UCITS ETF (IESG.L) have volatilities of 4.65% and 4.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.