ZM vs. VGT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (ZM) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT).

VGT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI US Investable Market Information Technology 25/50 Index. It was launched on Mar 25, 2004.

Performance

ZM vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (ZM) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ZM vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ZM Zoom Video Communications, Inc.	-6.84%	5.73%	13.49%	6.16%	-63.17%	-45.48%	395.77%	9.74%
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	-7.34%	21.77%	29.30%	52.66%	-29.70%	30.45%	46.04%	17.50%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZM achieves a -6.84% return, which is significantly higher than VGT's -7.34% return.

ZM

• 1D: 2.17%
• 1M: 8.72%
• YTD: -6.84%
• 6M: -2.56%
• 1Y: 8.97%
• 3Y*: 2.87%
• 5Y*: -24.43%
• 10Y*: —

VGT

• 1D: 4.34%
• 1M: -3.89%
• YTD: -7.34%
• 6M: -6.36%
• 1Y: 29.19%
• 3Y*: 22.58%
• 5Y*: 14.54%
• 10Y*: 21.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ZM vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZM

ZM Risk / Return Rank: 49
ZM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
ZM Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
ZM Omega Ratio Rank: 47
ZM Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
ZM Martin Ratio Rank: 51

VGT

VGT Risk / Return Rank: 67
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 66
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZM vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (ZM) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZM	VGT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.25	1.08	-0.83
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.64	1.65	-1.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.23	-0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.30	1.77	-1.46
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.80	5.47	-4.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZM vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZM Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZM and VGT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZM	VGT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25	1.08	-0.83
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.56	0.58	-1.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.88	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	0.61	-0.54

Correlation

The correlation between ZM and VGT is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ZM vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

ZM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ZM Zoom Video Communications, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF	0.44%	0.40%	0.60%	0.65%	0.91%	0.64%	0.82%	1.11%	1.29%	0.99%	1.31%	1.28%

Drawdowns

ZM vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZM drawdown since its inception was -90.27%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZM and VGT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZM	VGT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.27%	-54.63%	-35.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.42%	-16.40%	-8.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-86.21%	-35.07%	-51.14%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-85.86%	-12.77%	-73.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-62.29%	-8.00%	-54.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.21%	5.30%	+3.91%

Volatility

ZM vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (ZM) has a higher volatility of 8.65% compared to Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) at 7.99%. This indicates that ZM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZM	VGT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.65%	7.99%	+0.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.61%	16.31%	+12.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.67%	27.24%	+9.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.77%	25.07%	+18.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.49%	24.48%	+30.01%