ZIVB vs. VIXM
ZIVB (-1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF) and VIXM (ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZIVB is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Volatility Shares, while VIXM is a Volatility fund tracking the S&P 500 VIX Mid-Term Futures Index. ZIVB is actively managed, while VIXM is passively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZIVB charges 1.35%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for VIXM.
Performance
ZIVB vs. VIXM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ZIVB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VIXM
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- -4.64%
- YTD
- -1.77%
- 6M
- 0.07%
- 1Y
- -12.74%
- 3Y*
- -11.89%
- 5Y*
- -13.09%
- 10Y*
- -12.28%
ZIVB vs. VIXM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF | 33.28% |
VIXM ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF | -2.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZIVB and VIXM is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZIVB vs. VIXM — Risk / Return Rank
ZIVB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VIXM
ZIVB vs. VIXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF (ZIVB) and ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF (VIXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZIVB | VIXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.90 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.82 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.55 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZIVB vs. VIXM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZIVB drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum VIXM drawdown of -96.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIVB and VIXM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZIVB | VIXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -96.23% | +96.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -37.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -63.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -95.88% | +95.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -81.54% | +81.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.43% | — |
Volatility
ZIVB vs. VIXM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZIVB | VIXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.20% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.13% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 112.57% | 18.70% | +93.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 112.57% | 30.62% | +81.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 112.57% | 32.68% | +79.89% |
ZIVB vs. VIXM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZIVB has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VIXM's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
ZIVB vs. VIXM - Dividend Comparison
ZIVB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, while VIXM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
VIXM ProShares VIX Mid-Term Futures ETF | 0.00% |
ZIVB -1x Short VIX Mid-Term Futures Strategy ETF | 2.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZIVB and VIXM have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VIXM is cheaper at 0.85% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VIXM is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for ZIVB.
ZIVB has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 0.00% for VIXM.
ZIVB is categorized as Inverse Equities, while VIXM is Volatility. They also come from different issuers: Volatility Shares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.35% for ZIVB and 0.85% for VIXM.
Find the right allocation for ZIVB and VIXM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer