PortfoliosLab logo
ZION vs. WAL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ZION and WAL is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

ZION vs. WAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zions Bancorporation, National Association (ZION) and Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ZION:

0.41

WAL:

0.41

Sortino Ratio

ZION:

0.84

WAL:

0.84

Omega Ratio

ZION:

1.11

WAL:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

ZION:

0.38

WAL:

0.34

Martin Ratio

ZION:

1.12

WAL:

1.26

Ulcer Index

ZION:

13.42%

WAL:

13.37%

Daily Std Dev

ZION:

38.99%

WAL:

45.84%

Max Drawdown

ZION:

-92.20%

WAL:

-92.14%

Current Drawdown

ZION:

-27.53%

WAL:

-35.90%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ZION:

$7.04B

WAL:

$8.11B

EPS

ZION:

$5.12

WAL:

$7.36

PE Ratio

ZION:

9.32

WAL:

9.98

PEG Ratio

ZION:

3.07

WAL:

1.84

PS Ratio

ZION:

2.27

WAL:

2.66

PB Ratio

ZION:

1.13

WAL:

1.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

ZION:

$4.97B

WAL:

$3.21B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ZION:

$3.10B

WAL:

$4.14B

EBITDA (TTM)

ZION:

$1.17B

WAL:

$785.20M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZION achieves a -11.25% return, which is significantly higher than WAL's -12.53% return. Over the past 10 years, ZION has underperformed WAL with an annualized return of 7.27%, while WAL has yielded a comparatively higher 9.92% annualized return.


ZION

YTD

-11.25%

1M

6.24%

6M

-20.44%

1Y

15.80%

3Y*

-2.29%

5Y*

11.32%

10Y*

7.27%

WAL

YTD

-12.53%

1M

4.37%

6M

-21.94%

1Y

18.81%

3Y*

-1.48%

5Y*

16.05%

10Y*

9.92%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Western Alliance Bancorporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ZION vs. WAL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZION
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ZION is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ZION is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ZION is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ZION is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ZION is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ZION is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

WAL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WAL is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WAL is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WAL is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WAL is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WAL is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WAL is 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ZION vs. WAL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zions Bancorporation, National Association (ZION) and Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ZION Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is comparable to the WAL Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZION and WAL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

ZION vs. WAL - Dividend Comparison

ZION's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, more than WAL's 2.09% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ZION
Zions Bancorporation, National Association
3.59%3.06%3.74%3.21%2.28%3.13%2.47%2.55%0.87%0.65%0.81%0.56%
WAL
Western Alliance Bancorporation
2.09%1.78%2.20%2.38%1.11%1.67%0.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ZION vs. WAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZION drawdown since its inception was -92.20%, roughly equal to the maximum WAL drawdown of -92.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZION and WAL.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

ZION vs. WAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Zions Bancorporation, National Association (ZION) is 9.85%, while Western Alliance Bancorporation (WAL) has a volatility of 11.75%. This indicates that ZION experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ZION vs. WAL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Zions Bancorporation, National Association and Western Alliance Bancorporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20212022202320242025
1.20B
778.00M
(ZION) Total Revenue
(WAL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ZION vs. WAL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Zions Bancorporation, National Association and Western Alliance Bancorporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
64.8%
100.0%
(ZION) Gross Margin
(WAL) Gross Margin
ZION - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Zions Bancorporation, National Association reported a gross profit of 777.00M and revenue of 1.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.8%.

WAL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Western Alliance Bancorporation reported a gross profit of 778.00M and revenue of 778.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

ZION - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Zions Bancorporation, National Association reported an operating income of 239.00M and revenue of 1.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.9%.

WAL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Western Alliance Bancorporation reported an operating income of 229.40M and revenue of 778.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.5%.

ZION - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Zions Bancorporation, National Association reported a net income of 170.00M and revenue of 1.20B, resulting in a net margin of 14.2%.

WAL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Western Alliance Bancorporation reported a net income of 199.10M and revenue of 778.00M, resulting in a net margin of 25.6%.