PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZION vs. GLDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

ZION vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zions Bancorporation, National Association (ZION) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ZION vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ZION
Zions Bancorporation, National Association
-0.86%11.58%28.19%-6.29%-20.02%49.11%-13.17%31.00%-23.71%
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
8.57%64.20%27.08%13.04%-0.47%-4.01%25.10%18.10%1.84%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZION achieves a -0.86% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's 8.57% return.


ZION

1D
3.65%
1M
0.59%
YTD
-0.86%
6M
3.46%
1Y
19.43%
3Y*
29.38%
5Y*
4.30%
10Y*
12.17%

GLDM

1D
3.77%
1M
-10.99%
YTD
8.57%
6M
21.24%
1Y
49.77%
3Y*
33.33%
5Y*
21.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZION vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZION
ZION Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ZION Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZION Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZION Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
ZION Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZION Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDM
GLDM Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
GLDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDM Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZION vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zions Bancorporation, National Association (ZION) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZIONGLDMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.54

1.82

-1.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.88

2.25

-1.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.33

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

2.71

-1.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.52

10.04

-7.53

ZION vs. GLDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZION Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the GLDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZION and GLDM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZIONGLDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

1.82

-1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

1.25

-1.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

1.09

-0.85

Correlation

The correlation between ZION and GLDM is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

ZION vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison

ZION's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ZION
Zions Bancorporation, National Association
3.09%3.01%3.06%3.74%3.21%2.28%3.13%2.47%2.55%0.87%0.65%0.81%
GLDM
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ZION vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZION drawdown since its inception was -92.20%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZION and GLDM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ZIONGLDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.20%

-21.63%

-70.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.66%

-19.14%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-72.23%

-20.92%

-51.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.11%

-13.19%

+2.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.58%

-6.04%

-26.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.09%

5.16%

+2.93%

Volatility

ZION vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Zions Bancorporation, National Association (ZION) is 7.82%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 11.01%. This indicates that ZION experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ZIONGLDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.82%

11.01%

-3.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.96%

24.07%

+1.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.40%

27.57%

+8.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.80%

17.65%

+25.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.62%

16.77%

+22.85%