PortfoliosLab logo
ZIM vs. STLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ZIM and STLD is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

ZIM vs. STLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) and Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ZIM:

0.63

STLD:

0.01

Sortino Ratio

ZIM:

1.47

STLD:

0.31

Omega Ratio

ZIM:

1.19

STLD:

1.04

Calmar Ratio

ZIM:

1.01

STLD:

0.02

Martin Ratio

ZIM:

3.32

STLD:

0.03

Ulcer Index

ZIM:

18.35%

STLD:

14.24%

Daily Std Dev

ZIM:

78.30%

STLD:

37.65%

Max Drawdown

ZIM:

-84.68%

STLD:

-87.05%

Current Drawdown

ZIM:

-34.19%

STLD:

-12.64%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ZIM:

$2.06B

STLD:

$20.30B

EPS

ZIM:

$18.75

STLD:

$7.60

PE Ratio

ZIM:

0.91

STLD:

17.82

PS Ratio

ZIM:

0.24

STLD:

1.18

PB Ratio

ZIM:

0.51

STLD:

2.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

ZIM:

$6.87B

STLD:

$17.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ZIM:

$2.56B

STLD:

$2.30B

EBITDA (TTM)

ZIM:

$3.33B

STLD:

$1.88B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZIM achieves a 3.57% return, which is significantly lower than STLD's 17.70% return.


ZIM

YTD

3.57%

1M

28.55%

6M

6.55%

1Y

48.68%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

STLD

YTD

17.70%

1M

12.61%

6M

-5.00%

1Y

0.54%

5Y*

45.74%

10Y*

22.65%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ZIM vs. STLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZIM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ZIM is 7878
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ZIM is 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ZIM is 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ZIM is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ZIM is 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ZIM is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

STLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of STLD is 4848
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of STLD is 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of STLD is 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of STLD is 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of STLD is 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of STLD is 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ZIM vs. STLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) and Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ZIM Sharpe Ratio is 0.63, which is higher than the STLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZIM and STLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

ZIM vs. STLD - Dividend Comparison

ZIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.65%, more than STLD's 1.41% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
43.65%22.40%64.84%160.27%7.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
STLD
Steel Dynamics, Inc.
1.41%1.61%1.44%1.39%1.68%2.71%2.82%2.50%1.44%1.57%3.08%2.33%

Drawdowns

ZIM vs. STLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZIM drawdown since its inception was -84.68%, roughly equal to the maximum STLD drawdown of -87.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIM and STLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

ZIM vs. STLD - Volatility Comparison

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) has a higher volatility of 22.70% compared to Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD) at 10.15%. This indicates that ZIM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ZIM vs. STLD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. and Steel Dynamics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20212022202320242025
2.17B
4.37B
(ZIM) Total Revenue
(STLD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ZIM vs. STLD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. and Steel Dynamics, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
33.7%
11.1%
(ZIM) Gross Margin
(STLD) Gross Margin
ZIM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a gross profit of 731.00M and revenue of 2.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.7%.

STLD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Steel Dynamics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 486.54M and revenue of 4.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.1%.

ZIM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported an operating income of 657.60M and revenue of 2.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.3%.

STLD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Steel Dynamics, Inc. reported an operating income of 275.14M and revenue of 4.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.3%.

ZIM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a net income of 561.50M and revenue of 2.17B, resulting in a net margin of 25.9%.

STLD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Steel Dynamics, Inc. reported a net income of 217.15M and revenue of 4.37B, resulting in a net margin of 5.0%.