ZIM vs. STLD

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) and Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD).

Performance

ZIM vs. STLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) and Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ZIM vs. STLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.	28.30%	28.11%	176.93%	-21.06%	-52.70%	463.11%
STLD Steel Dynamics, Inc.	6.55%	50.70%	-1.99%	22.75%	60.14%	79.76%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ZIM : $3.18B STLD : $26.32B
EPS ZIM : $3.98 STLD : $8.03
PE Ratio ZIM : 6.63 STLD : 22.43
PS Ratio ZIM : 0.46 STLD : 1.46
PB Ratio ZIM : 0.79 STLD : 2.94
Total Revenue (TTM) ZIM : $6.90B STLD : $18.18B
Gross Profit (TTM) ZIM : $1.16B STLD : $2.38B
EBITDA (TTM) ZIM : $2.27B STLD : $2.11B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZIM achieves a 28.30% return, which is significantly higher than STLD's 6.55% return.

ZIM

• 1D: 1.82%
• 1M: -5.52%
• YTD: 28.30%
• 6M: 104.13%
• 1Y: 98.85%
• 3Y*: 37.85%
• 5Y*: 32.97%
• 10Y*: —

STLD

• 1D: 5.11%
• 1M: -6.51%
• YTD: 6.55%
• 6M: 29.88%
• 1Y: 45.86%
• 3Y*: 18.48%
• 5Y*: 30.71%
• 10Y*: 25.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ZIM vs. STLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZIM

ZIM Risk / Return Rank: 84
ZIM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
ZIM Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
ZIM Omega Ratio Rank: 83
ZIM Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
ZIM Martin Ratio Rank: 81

STLD

STLD Risk / Return Rank: 79
STLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
STLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
STLD Omega Ratio Rank: 73
STLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
STLD Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZIM vs. STLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) and Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZIM	STLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	1.23	+0.35
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.42	1.90	+0.51
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.23	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	2.35	+0.33
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.03	7.63	-1.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZIM vs. STLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZIM Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the STLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZIM and STLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZIM	STLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.57	1.23	+0.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	0.81	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.65	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	0.32	+0.48

Correlation

The correlation between ZIM and STLD is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ZIM vs. STLD - Dividend Comparison

ZIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.55%, more than STLD's 1.13% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.	7.55%	20.16%	22.40%	64.84%	160.27%	7.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
STLD Steel Dynamics, Inc.	1.13%	1.18%	1.61%	1.44%	1.39%	1.68%	2.71%	2.82%	2.50%	1.44%	1.57%	3.08%

Drawdowns

ZIM vs. STLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZIM drawdown since its inception was -84.68%, roughly equal to the maximum STLD drawdown of -87.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIM and STLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZIM	STLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.68%	-87.05%	+2.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.64%	-20.33%	-12.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-84.68%	-32.20%	-52.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-68.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.94%	-12.26%	+5.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-41.12%	-33.48%	-7.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.49%	6.26%	+8.23%

Volatility

ZIM vs. STLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) is 9.55%, while Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD) has a volatility of 11.06%. This indicates that ZIM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZIM	STLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.55%	11.06%	-1.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	40.45%	24.29%	+16.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	63.53%	37.62%	+25.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	67.47%	38.01%	+29.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	68.52%	39.19%	+29.33%

Financials

ZIM vs. STLD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. and Steel Dynamics, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ZIM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a gross profit of 83.60M and revenue of 1.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 5.6%.

STLD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Steel Dynamics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 522.07M and revenue of 4.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.8%.

ZIM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported an operating income of 3.20M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.2%.

STLD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Steel Dynamics, Inc. reported an operating income of 310.23M and revenue of 4.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.0%.

ZIM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a net income of 38.10M and revenue of 1.48B, resulting in a net margin of 2.6%.

STLD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Steel Dynamics, Inc. reported a net income of 266.03M and revenue of 4.41B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.