ZIM vs. GNK
ZIM (ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.) and GNK (Genco Shipping & Trading Limited) are both stocks. Both operate in the Marine Shipping industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 5 years, ZIM returned 20.68%/yr vs 17.64%/yr for GNK. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ZIM vs. GNK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZIM achieves a 19.30% return, which is significantly lower than GNK's 35.09% return.
ZIM
- 1D
- -2.82%
- 1M
- -6.02%
- YTD
- 19.30%
- 6M
- 27.46%
- 1Y
- 54.12%
- 3Y*
- 43.32%
- 5Y*
- 20.68%
- 10Y*
- —
GNK
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 1.48%
- YTD
- 35.09%
- 6M
- 30.42%
- 1Y
- 92.59%
- 3Y*
- 28.74%
- 5Y*
- 17.64%
- 10Y*
- 22.05%
ZIM vs. GNK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. | 19.30% | 28.11% | 176.93% | -21.06% | -52.70% | 463.11% |
GNK Genco Shipping & Trading Limited | 35.09% | 39.12% | -8.87% | 14.44% | 11.41% | 118.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZIM and GNK is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021 | 0.38 |
The correlation between ZIM and GNK shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ZIM:
$2.95B
GNK:
$1.07B
ZIM:
$0.81
GNK:
$212.52
ZIM:
30.16
GNK:
0.11
ZIM:
0.47
GNK:
0.01
ZIM:
0.77
GNK:
0.00
ZIM:
$6.29B
GNK:
$114.70B
ZIM:
$676.00M
GNK:
$72.12B
ZIM:
$1.73B
GNK:
$112.04M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZIM vs. GNK — Risk / Return Rank
ZIM
GNK
ZIM vs. GNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) and Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZIM | GNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.42 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 4.86 | -3.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.29 | 13.93 | -9.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZIM | GNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 2.72 | -1.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.43 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | -0.21 | +0.96 |
Drawdowns
ZIM vs. GNK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZIM drawdown since its inception was -84.68%, smaller than the maximum GNK drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIM and GNK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZIM | GNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.68% | -98.25% | +13.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.66% | -19.16% | -11.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.12% | -47.06% | -10.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.68% | -53.91% | -30.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.19% | -81.99% | +67.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.05% | -88.19% | +48.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.65% | 6.67% | +5.98% |
Volatility
ZIM vs. GNK - Volatility Comparison
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) has a higher volatility of 14.70% compared to Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) at 11.51%. This indicates that ZIM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GNK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZIM | GNK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.70% | 11.51% | +3.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.41% | 26.89% | +10.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.01% | 34.24% | +18.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 65.89% | 41.67% | +24.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.72% | 59.11% | +8.61% |
Dividends
ZIM vs. GNK - Dividend Comparison
ZIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.10%, more than GNK's 4.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GNK Genco Shipping & Trading Limited | 4.79% | 4.07% | 11.26% | 5.73% | 17.84% | 2.00% | 3.19% | 4.71% |
ZIM ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. | 5.10% | 20.16% | 22.40% | 64.84% | 160.27% | 7.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ZIM vs. GNK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. and Genco Shipping & Trading Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ZIM vs. GNK - Profitability Comparison
ZIM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a gross profit of 46.80M and revenue of 1.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 3.4%.
GNK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genco Shipping & Trading Limited reported a gross profit of 72.06B and revenue of 114.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.0%.
ZIM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported an operating income of -39.00M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.8%.
GNK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genco Shipping & Trading Limited reported an operating income of 13.31M and revenue of 114.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
ZIM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a net income of -86.00M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in a net margin of -6.2%.
GNK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genco Shipping & Trading Limited reported a net income of 9.31B and revenue of 114.43B, resulting in a net margin of 8.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ZIM and GNK have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZIM has higher volatility (14.70%) compared to GNK (11.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZIM dropped -84.68% vs GNK's -98.25%.
GNK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZIM and GNK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer