ZIL-USD vs. VHT
ZIL-USD (Zilliqa) is a cryptocurrency, while VHT (Vanguard Health Care ETF) is Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index. Over the past 5 years, ZIL-USD returned -46.69%/yr vs 5.40%/yr for VHT. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ZIL-USD vs. VHT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZIL-USD achieves a -36.43% return, which is significantly lower than VHT's 6.18% return.
ZIL-USD
- 1D
- -1.62%
- 1M
- -4.13%
- 6M
- -42.29%
- YTD
- -36.43%
- 1Y
- -75.69%
- 3Y*
- -48.62%
- 5Y*
- -46.69%
- 10Y*
- —
VHT
- 1D
- -1.00%
- 1M
- 6.30%
- 6M
- 4.32%
- YTD
- 6.18%
- 1Y
- 23.92%
- 3Y*
- 9.71%
- 5Y*
- 5.40%
- 10Y*
- 10.09%
ZIL-USD vs. VHT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZIL-USD Zilliqa | -36.43% | -76.73% | -16.92% | 52.97% | -78.84% | -8.87% | 1,050.63% | -63.07% | -85.89% |
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | 6.18% | 15.46% | 2.66% | 2.52% | -5.60% | 20.57% | 18.29% | 21.87% | -2.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZIL-USD and VHT is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2018 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZIL-USD vs. VHT — Risk / Return Rank
ZIL-USD
VHT
ZIL-USD vs. VHT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zilliqa (ZIL-USD) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ZIL-USD | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.26 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.96 | 2.19 | -3.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.31 | 5.39 | -6.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ZIL-USD vs. VHT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZIL-USD drawdown since its inception was -98.79%, which is greater than VHT's maximum drawdown of -39.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIL-USD and VHT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZIL-USD | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.79% | -39.12% | -59.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -79.04% | -10.40% | -68.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -92.94% | -16.91% | -76.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.43% | -17.71% | -80.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.74% | -2.20% | -96.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.27% | -5.97% | -77.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.96% | 4.23% | +41.73% |
Volatility
ZIL-USD vs. VHT - Volatility Comparison
Zilliqa (ZIL-USD) has a higher volatility of 10.72% compared to Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) at 5.57%. This indicates that ZIL-USD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZIL-USD | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.72% | 5.57% | +5.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.62% | 11.30% | +46.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.71% | 15.35% | +52.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 91.47% | 15.17% | +76.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 139.92% | 16.97% | +122.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZIL-USD and VHT have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZIL-USD has higher volatility (10.72%) compared to VHT (5.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZIL-USD dropped -98.79% vs VHT's -39.12%.
VHT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZIL-USD and VHT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer