ZIG vs. VOOG

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

ZIG (Acquirers Fund) and VOOG (Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZIG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Acquirer's Index, while VOOG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ZIG returned 9.46%/yr vs 13.96%/yr for VOOG. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ZIG charges 1.85%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VOOG.

Performance

ZIG vs. VOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Acquirers Fund (ZIG) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZIG achieves a 7.73% return, which is significantly lower than VOOG's 8.28% return.

ZIG

• 1D: 0.83%
• 1M: -1.03%
• YTD: 7.73%
• 6M: 6.09%
• 1Y: 13.49%
• 3Y*: 12.73%
• 5Y*: 9.46%
• 10Y*: —

VOOG

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: -2.42%
• YTD: 8.28%
• 6M: 6.74%
• 1Y: 24.39%
• 3Y*: 25.30%
• 5Y*: 13.96%
• 10Y*: 17.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZIG vs. VOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ZIG Acquirers Fund	7.73%	-2.67%	11.34%	36.70%	-17.34%	37.38%	-15.76%	10.14%
VOOG Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF	8.28%	22.11%	35.89%	29.96%	-29.48%	31.95%	33.35%	13.67%

Correlation

The correlation between ZIG and VOOG is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 15, 2019	0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between ZIG and VOOG has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ZIG vs. VOOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ZIG	VOOG
Consumer Cyclical	39.9%	9.0%
Energy	14.6%	0.1%
Basic Materials	10.3%	0.3%
Industrials	10.2%	5.7%
Consumer Defensive	10.1%	1.0%
Financial Services	6.9%	8.2%
Healthcare	4.2%	5.7%
Technology	3.8%	52.6%
Communication Services	-	16.7%
Real Estate	-	0.5%
Utilities	-	0.4%

Return for Risk

ZIG vs. VOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZIG

ZIG Risk / Return Rank: 24
ZIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
ZIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
ZIG Omega Ratio Rank: 22
ZIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
ZIG Martin Ratio Rank: 26

VOOG

VOOG Risk / Return Rank: 43
VOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
VOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
VOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 43
VOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
VOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZIG vs. VOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Acquirers Fund (ZIG) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ZIG	VOOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.75	1.45	-0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.30	2.00	-0.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.26	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.09	1.79	-0.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.25	7.05	-3.81

ZIG vs. VOOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZIG Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the VOOG Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZIG and VOOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ZIG vs. VOOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZIG drawdown since its inception was -37.14%, which is greater than VOOG's maximum drawdown of -32.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZIG and VOOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZIG	VOOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.14%	-32.73%	-4.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.38%	-13.71%	+1.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.75%	-22.18%	-7.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.75%	-32.73%	+2.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.45%	-5.86%	-0.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.71%	-4.96%	-4.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.17%	3.47%	+0.70%

Volatility

ZIG vs. VOOG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Acquirers Fund (ZIG) is 3.54%, while Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) has a volatility of 7.24%. This indicates that ZIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZIG	VOOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.54%	7.24%	-3.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.91%	13.81%	-3.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.96%	17.00%	+0.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.48%	21.38%	-0.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.08%	20.81%	+1.27%

ZIG vs. VOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZIG has a 1.85% expense ratio, which is higher than VOOG's 0.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZIG vs. VOOG - Dividend Comparison

ZIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, more than VOOG's 0.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VOOG Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF	0.46%	0.49%	0.49%	1.12%	0.93%	0.53%	0.88%	1.26%	1.34%	1.32%	1.47%	1.56%
ZIG Acquirers Fund	1.77%	1.91%	1.96%	1.07%	1.26%	0.18%	0.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZIG and VOOG in my portfolio?

ZIG and VOOG have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ZIG or VOOG?

VOOG has higher volatility (7.24%) compared to ZIG (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZIG dropped -37.14% vs VOOG's -32.73%.

Which ETF is better, ZIG or VOOG?

On 5-year performance, VOOG leads with 13.96% vs 9.46% for ZIG. On fees, VOOG is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, ZIG has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ZIG or VOOG?

Over the 5-year period, VOOG has performed better with a 13.96% return vs 9.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZIG or VOOG?

VOOG is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.85% for ZIG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ZIG or VOOG?

ZIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 0.46% for VOOG.

What is the main difference between ZIG and VOOG?

ZIG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VOOG is S&P 500. ZIG tracks Acquirer's Index, while VOOG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Acquirers Funds and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.85% for ZIG and 0.07% for VOOG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VOOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.