ZEUS vs. METC

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS) and Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC).

Performance

ZEUS vs. METC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS) and Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ZEUS vs. METC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ZEUS Olympic Steel, Inc.	11.86%	32.92%	-50.20%	100.65%	44.56%	76.88%	-25.11%	26.29%	-33.35%	-2.79%
METC Ramaco Resources, Inc.	-17.61%	94.40%	-37.24%	105.93%	-32.97%	372.22%	-19.55%	-27.68%	-28.05%	-49.23%

Fundamentals

EPS ZEUS : $1.17 METC : -$1.55
PS Ratio ZEUS : 0.30 METC : 0.92
Total Revenue (TTM) ZEUS : $1.90B METC : $536.62M
Gross Profit (TTM) ZEUS : $1.57B METC : $5.58M
EBITDA (TTM) ZEUS : $44.37M METC : $20.61M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZEUS achieves a 11.86% return, which is significantly higher than METC's -17.61% return.

ZEUS

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 11.86%
• 6M: 56.95%
• 1Y: 54.61%
• 3Y*: -1.58%
• 5Y*: 10.63%
• 10Y*: 11.45%

METC

• 1D: -4.08%
• 1M: -4.63%
• YTD: -17.61%
• 6M: -57.26%
• 1Y: 87.88%
• 3Y*: 26.82%
• 5Y*: 33.80%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ZEUS vs. METC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZEUS

ZEUS Risk / Return Rank: 78
ZEUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
ZEUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
ZEUS Omega Ratio Rank: 77
ZEUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
ZEUS Martin Ratio Rank: 78

METC

METC Risk / Return Rank: 67
METC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
METC Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
METC Omega Ratio Rank: 68
METC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
METC Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZEUS vs. METC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS) and Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ZEUS	METC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	0.86	+0.38
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.07	1.71	+0.36
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.21	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.13	1.25	+0.88
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.63	2.13	+3.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ZEUS vs. METC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZEUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the METC Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZEUS and METC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ZEUS	METC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.24	0.86	+0.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22	0.41	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	0.05	+0.01

Correlation

The correlation between ZEUS and METC is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ZEUS vs. METC - Dividend Comparison

ZEUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, more than METC's 0.46% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ZEUS Olympic Steel, Inc.	1.00%	1.50%	1.83%	0.75%	1.07%	0.34%	0.60%	0.45%	0.56%	0.37%	0.33%	0.69%
METC Ramaco Resources, Inc.	0.46%	1.10%	5.32%	2.91%	5.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

ZEUS vs. METC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZEUS drawdown since its inception was -93.67%, which is greater than METC's maximum drawdown of -85.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZEUS and METC.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZEUS	METC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.67%	-85.54%	-8.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.93%	-75.34%	+52.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.26%	-75.34%	+14.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-74.28%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.56%	-72.81%	+41.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-58.14%	-50.19%	-7.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.66%	44.08%	-35.42%

Volatility

ZEUS vs. METC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS) is 0.00%, while Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) has a volatility of 24.27%. This indicates that ZEUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than METC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZEUS	METC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	24.27%	-24.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.61%	70.71%	-38.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	44.93%	103.21%	-58.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.33%	82.38%	-33.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.51%	75.99%	-21.48%

Financials

ZEUS vs. METC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Olympic Steel, Inc. and Ramaco Resources, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ZEUS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Olympic Steel, Inc. reported a gross profit of 486.17M and revenue of 490.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.1%.

METC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ramaco Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 128.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ZEUS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Olympic Steel, Inc. reported an operating income of 7.26M and revenue of 490.66M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.5%.

METC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ramaco Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of -15.61M and revenue of 128.01M, resulting in an operating margin of -12.2%.

ZEUS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Olympic Steel, Inc. reported a net income of 2.15M and revenue of 490.66M, resulting in a net margin of 0.4%.

METC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ramaco Resources, Inc. reported a net income of -14.71M and revenue of 128.01M, resulting in a net margin of -11.5%.