ZEUS vs. METC
ZEUS (Olympic Steel, Inc.) and METC (Ramaco Resources, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Basic Materials sector — ZEUS in Steel, METC in Coking Coal. Over the past 5 years, ZEUS returned 7.93%/yr vs 28.68%/yr for METC. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ZEUS vs. METC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZEUS achieves a 11.86% return, which is significantly higher than METC's -6.33% return.
ZEUS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 11.86%
- 6M
- 19.08%
- 1Y
- 53.05%
- 3Y*
- 2.65%
- 5Y*
- 7.93%
- 10Y*
- 7.83%
METC
- 1D
- -3.77%
- 1M
- 16.36%
- YTD
- -6.33%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- 78.60%
- 3Y*
- 37.09%
- 5Y*
- 28.68%
- 10Y*
- —
ZEUS vs. METC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZEUS Olympic Steel, Inc. | 11.86% | 32.92% | -50.20% | 100.65% | 44.56% | 76.88% | -25.11% | 26.29% | -33.35% | -2.79% |
METC Ramaco Resources, Inc. | -6.33% | 94.40% | -37.24% | 105.93% | -32.97% | 372.22% | -19.55% | -27.68% | -28.05% | -49.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZEUS and METC is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2017 | 0.29 |
The correlation between ZEUS and METC shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ZEUS:
$1.17
METC:
-$1.62
ZEUS:
0.30
METC:
1.20
ZEUS:
$1.90B
METC:
$523.58M
ZEUS:
$1.57B
METC:
$10.83M
ZEUS:
$44.37M
METC:
$723.00K
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZEUS vs. METC — Risk / Return Rank
ZEUS
METC
ZEUS vs. METC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS) and Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZEUS | METC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.20 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 1.04 | +1.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.50 | 1.48 | +5.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZEUS | METC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 0.78 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.35 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 0.07 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
ZEUS vs. METC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZEUS drawdown since its inception was -93.67%, which is greater than METC's maximum drawdown of -85.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZEUS and METC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZEUS | METC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.67% | -85.54% | -8.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.93% | -75.80% | +52.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.26% | -75.80% | +14.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.26% | -75.80% | +14.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.56% | -69.09% | +37.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.00% | -50.61% | -7.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.26% | 53.26% | -45.00% |
Volatility
ZEUS vs. METC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Olympic Steel, Inc. (ZEUS) is 0.00%, while Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) has a volatility of 23.07%. This indicates that ZEUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than METC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZEUS | METC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 23.07% | -23.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.84% | 62.77% | -43.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.32% | 101.82% | -62.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.03% | 82.15% | -35.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 53.95% | 75.87% | -21.92% |
Dividends
ZEUS vs. METC - Dividend Comparison
ZEUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, while METC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
METC Ramaco Resources, Inc. | 0.00% | 1.10% | 5.32% | 2.91% | 5.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZEUS Olympic Steel, Inc. | 0.67% | 1.50% | 1.83% | 0.75% | 1.07% | 0.34% | 0.60% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.37% | 0.33% | 0.69% |
Financials
ZEUS vs. METC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Olympic Steel, Inc. and Ramaco Resources, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ZEUS vs. METC - Profitability Comparison
ZEUS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Olympic Steel, Inc. reported a gross profit of 486.17M and revenue of 490.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.1%.
METC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ramaco Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 121.61M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
ZEUS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Olympic Steel, Inc. reported an operating income of 7.26M and revenue of 490.66M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.5%.
METC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ramaco Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of -24.31M and revenue of 121.61M, resulting in an operating margin of -20.0%.
ZEUS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Olympic Steel, Inc. reported a net income of 2.15M and revenue of 490.66M, resulting in a net margin of 0.4%.
METC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ramaco Resources, Inc. reported a net income of -18.32M and revenue of 121.61M, resulting in a net margin of -15.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ZEUS and METC have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
METC has higher volatility (23.07%) compared to ZEUS (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZEUS dropped -93.67% vs METC's -85.54%.
ZEUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ZEUS and METC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer