ZEA.TO vs. VYMI
ZEA.TO (BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF) and VYMI (Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZEA.TO is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Index, while VYMI is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE All-World ex US High Dividend Yield Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ZEA.TO returned 9.90%/yr vs 11.37%/yr for VYMI. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ZEA.TO charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VYMI.
Performance
ZEA.TO vs. VYMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ZEA.TO is traded in CAD, while VYMI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VYMI values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ZEA.TO achieves a 10.79% return, which is significantly lower than VYMI's 13.53% return. Over the past 10 years, ZEA.TO has underperformed VYMI with an annualized return of 9.90%, while VYMI has yielded a comparatively higher 11.37% annualized return.
ZEA.TO
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 4.84%
- YTD
- 10.79%
- 6M
- 10.55%
- 1Y
- 22.50%
- 3Y*
- 17.95%
- 5Y*
- 11.18%
- 10Y*
- 9.90%
VYMI
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 3.82%
- YTD
- 13.53%
- 6M
- 14.73%
- 1Y
- 33.00%
- 3Y*
- 23.69%
- 5Y*
- 15.31%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
ZEA.TO vs. VYMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZEA.TO BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF | 10.79% | 24.28% | 11.56% | 16.02% | -8.51% | 10.64% | 5.13% | 16.71% | -6.24% | 16.77% |
VYMI Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF | 13.53% | 31.72% | 16.25% | 14.49% | -0.40% | 14.35% | -2.78% | 12.61% | -5.24% | 14.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZEA.TO and VYMI is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2016 | 0.84 |
The correlation between ZEA.TO and VYMI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
ZEA.TO vs. VYMI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ZEA.TO
VYMI
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
ZEA.TO
VYMI
Industrials
ZEA.TO
VYMI
Healthcare
ZEA.TO
VYMI
Technology
ZEA.TO
VYMI
Consumer Cyclical
ZEA.TO
VYMI
Consumer Defensive
ZEA.TO
VYMI
Basic Materials
ZEA.TO
VYMI
Communication Services
ZEA.TO
VYMI
Energy
ZEA.TO
VYMI
Utilities
ZEA.TO
VYMI
Real Estate
ZEA.TO
VYMI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ZEA.TO vs. VYMI — Risk / Return Rank
ZEA.TO
VYMI
ZEA.TO vs. VYMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF (ZEA.TO) and Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ZEA.TO | VYMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.52 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 3.37 | -1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.07 | 14.04 | -5.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ZEA.TO | VYMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.62 | 2.79 | -1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 1.31 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.81 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.82 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
ZEA.TO vs. VYMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZEA.TO drawdown since its inception was -27.80%, smaller than the maximum VYMI drawdown of -31.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZEA.TO and VYMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ZEA.TO | VYMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.80% | -31.33% | +3.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.91% | -9.84% | -1.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.11% | -13.21% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.67% | -17.66% | -6.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.80% | -31.33% | +3.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | 0.00% | -1.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.63% | -3.98% | -0.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.79% | 2.36% | +0.43% |
Volatility
ZEA.TO vs. VYMI - Volatility Comparison
BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF (ZEA.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.56% compared to Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF (VYMI) at 3.78%. This indicates that ZEA.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VYMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ZEA.TO | VYMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.56% | 3.78% | +1.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.70% | 10.04% | +1.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.93% | 11.90% | +2.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.51% | 11.75% | +1.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.92% | 14.00% | +0.92% |
ZEA.TO vs. VYMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZEA.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than VYMI's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ZEA.TO vs. VYMI - Dividend Comparison
ZEA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%, less than VYMI's 3.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VYMI Vanguard International High Dividend Yield ETF | 3.42% | 3.68% | 4.84% | 4.58% | 4.70% | 4.30% | 3.22% | 4.20% | 4.29% | 3.21% | 2.39% | 0.00% |
ZEA.TO BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF | 1.92% | 2.17% | 2.77% | 3.00% | 3.06% | 2.48% | 2.72% | 2.93% | 3.03% | 2.39% | 2.78% | 2.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ZEA.TO and VYMI have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VYMI is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VYMI is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for ZEA.TO.
ZEA.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while VYMI is Dividend. ZEA.TO tracks MSCI EAFE Index, while VYMI tracks FTSE All-World ex US High Dividend Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: BMO and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for ZEA.TO and 0.07% for VYMI.
Find the right allocation for ZEA.TO and VYMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer