PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZDGE vs. CRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ZDGE vs. CRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zedge, Inc. (ZDGE) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZDGE achieves a -6.50% return, which is significantly lower than CRT's 13.93% return. Over the past 10 years, ZDGE has underperformed CRT with an annualized return of -4.36%, while CRT has yielded a comparatively higher 1.86% annualized return.


ZDGE

1D
-0.66%
1M
4.85%
YTD
-6.50%
6M
-14.34%
1Y
-24.10%
3Y*
14.37%
5Y*
-29.82%
10Y*
-4.36%

CRT

1D
2.54%
1M
-18.51%
YTD
13.93%
6M
16.62%
1Y
-3.18%
3Y*
-21.07%
5Y*
2.32%
10Y*
1.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZDGE vs. CRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ZDGE
Zedge, Inc.
-6.50%22.51%14.47%33.52%-79.29%40.73%292.21%-37.09%-10.95%-12.17%
CRT
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
13.93%-13.15%-39.15%-24.36%145.90%53.31%5.38%-13.04%-17.93%-12.70%

Correlation

The correlation between ZDGE and CRT is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2016

0.05

The correlation between ZDGE and CRT shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.07 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ZDGE:

$39.95M

CRT:

$53.34M

EPS

ZDGE:

-$0.09

CRT:

$0.54

PS Ratio

ZDGE:

1.27

CRT:

11.86

PB Ratio

ZDGE:

1.63

CRT:

25.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

ZDGE:

$31.32M

CRT:

$4.50M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ZDGE:

$28.55M

CRT:

$4.33M

EBITDA (TTM)

ZDGE:

-$506.00K

CRT:

$3.36M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZDGE vs. CRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZDGE
ZDGE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
ZDGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZDGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZDGE Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
ZDGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZDGE Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

CRT
CRT Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
CRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRT Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
CRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRT Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZDGE vs. CRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zedge, Inc. (ZDGE) and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZDGECRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.01

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.47

-0.12

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.72

-0.25

-0.48

ZDGE vs. CRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZDGE Sharpe Ratio is -0.31, which is lower than the CRT Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZDGE and CRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZDGE vs. CRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZDGE drawdown since its inception was -91.40%, which is greater than CRT's maximum drawdown of -83.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZDGE and CRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZDGECRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.40%

-83.57%

-7.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.98%

-27.77%

-24.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.18%

-63.52%

+2.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.95%

-71.10%

-19.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.40%

-71.10%

-20.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-84.13%

-61.95%

-22.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.70%

-29.44%

-40.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.34%

12.86%

+20.48%

Volatility

ZDGE vs. CRT - Volatility Comparison

Zedge, Inc. (ZDGE) has a higher volatility of 37.96% compared to Cross Timbers Royalty Trust (CRT) at 11.09%. This indicates that ZDGE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZDGECRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

37.96%

11.09%

+26.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.44%

21.75%

+36.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

78.48%

32.00%

+46.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

78.60%

50.51%

+28.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

87.65%

46.12%

+41.53%

Dividends

ZDGE vs. CRT - Dividend Comparison

ZDGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.39%, less than CRT's 5.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRT
Cross Timbers Royalty Trust
5.87%9.41%9.56%10.96%7.69%9.71%9.45%10.04%13.06%6.87%5.90%10.41%
ZDGE
Zedge, Inc.
2.39%0.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ZDGE vs. CRT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Zedge, Inc. and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00M4.00M6.00M8.00M20222023202420252026
7.99M
787.85K
(ZDGE) Total Revenue
(CRT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ZDGE vs. CRT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Zedge, Inc. and Cross Timbers Royalty Trust over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

80.0%85.0%90.0%95.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
93.1%
95.8%
Portfolio components
ZDGE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zedge, Inc. reported a gross profit of 7.44M and revenue of 7.99M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 93.1%.

CRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported a gross profit of 754.63K and revenue of 787.85K. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.8%.

ZDGE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zedge, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.07M and revenue of 7.99M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.4%.

CRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported an operating income of 503.41K and revenue of 787.85K, resulting in an operating margin of 63.9%.

ZDGE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Zedge, Inc. reported a net income of 926.00K and revenue of 7.99M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.

CRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cross Timbers Royalty Trust reported a net income of 503.41K and revenue of 787.85K, resulting in a net margin of 63.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ZDGE and CRT have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZDGE has higher volatility (37.96%) compared to CRT (11.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZDGE dropped -91.40% vs CRT's -83.57%.

CRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.10 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZDGE and CRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer