PortfoliosLab logo
ZBRA vs. HUBB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ZBRA and HUBB is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

ZBRA vs. HUBB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) and Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ZBRA:

-0.42

HUBB:

-0.34

Sortino Ratio

ZBRA:

-0.35

HUBB:

-0.10

Omega Ratio

ZBRA:

0.95

HUBB:

0.99

Calmar Ratio

ZBRA:

-0.25

HUBB:

-0.25

Martin Ratio

ZBRA:

-0.89

HUBB:

-0.57

Ulcer Index

ZBRA:

18.15%

HUBB:

14.08%

Daily Std Dev

ZBRA:

38.06%

HUBB:

34.45%

Max Drawdown

ZBRA:

-73.42%

HUBB:

-41.63%

Current Drawdown

ZBRA:

-56.60%

HUBB:

-23.95%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ZBRA:

$13.56B

HUBB:

$19.04B

EPS

ZBRA:

$10.56

HUBB:

$14.80

PE Ratio

ZBRA:

25.26

HUBB:

24.10

PEG Ratio

ZBRA:

1.13

HUBB:

2.07

PS Ratio

ZBRA:

2.65

HUBB:

3.40

PB Ratio

ZBRA:

3.61

HUBB:

5.77

Total Revenue (TTM)

ZBRA:

$5.11B

HUBB:

$5.59B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ZBRA:

$2.47B

HUBB:

$1.91B

EBITDA (TTM)

ZBRA:

$976.00M

HUBB:

$1.29B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZBRA achieves a -30.94% return, which is significantly lower than HUBB's -14.54% return.


ZBRA

YTD

-30.94%

1M

19.40%

6M

-33.21%

1Y

-15.54%

5Y*

2.55%

10Y*

9.62%

HUBB

YTD

-14.54%

1M

4.35%

6M

-23.27%

1Y

-11.29%

5Y*

26.46%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ZBRA vs. HUBB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZBRA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ZBRA is 3030
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ZBRA is 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ZBRA is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ZBRA is 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ZBRA is 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ZBRA is 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

HUBB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HUBB is 3535
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HUBB is 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HUBB is 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HUBB is 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HUBB is 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HUBB is 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ZBRA vs. HUBB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) and Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ZBRA Sharpe Ratio is -0.42, which is comparable to the HUBB Sharpe Ratio of -0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZBRA and HUBB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

ZBRA vs. HUBB - Dividend Comparison

ZBRA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HUBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%.


TTM202420232022202120202019201820172016
ZBRA
Zebra Technologies Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HUBB
Hubbell Incorporated
1.42%1.19%1.39%1.82%1.92%2.37%2.32%3.17%2.12%2.22%

Drawdowns

ZBRA vs. HUBB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZBRA drawdown since its inception was -73.42%, which is greater than HUBB's maximum drawdown of -41.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZBRA and HUBB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

ZBRA vs. HUBB - Volatility Comparison

Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) has a higher volatility of 13.80% compared to Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) at 11.11%. This indicates that ZBRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HUBB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

ZBRA vs. HUBB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Zebra Technologies Corporation and Hubbell Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


900.00M1.00B1.10B1.20B1.30B1.40B1.50B20212022202320242025
1.31B
1.37B
(ZBRA) Total Revenue
(HUBB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ZBRA vs. HUBB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Zebra Technologies Corporation and Hubbell Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20212022202320242025
49.3%
33.1%
(ZBRA) Gross Margin
(HUBB) Gross Margin
ZBRA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Zebra Technologies Corporation reported a gross profit of 645.00M and revenue of 1.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.

HUBB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Hubbell Incorporated reported a gross profit of 451.20M and revenue of 1.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.1%.

ZBRA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Zebra Technologies Corporation reported an operating income of 195.00M and revenue of 1.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.9%.

HUBB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Hubbell Incorporated reported an operating income of 239.00M and revenue of 1.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.5%.

ZBRA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Zebra Technologies Corporation reported a net income of 136.00M and revenue of 1.31B, resulting in a net margin of 10.4%.

HUBB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Hubbell Incorporated reported a net income of 169.70M and revenue of 1.37B, resulting in a net margin of 12.4%.