PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ZBRA vs. ASML
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between ZBRA and ASML is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.4

Performance

ZBRA vs. ASML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%10,000.00%20,000.00%30,000.00%40,000.00%50,000.00%60,000.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
4,377.66%
38,150.31%
ZBRA
ASML

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ZBRA:

1.64

ASML:

-0.06

Sortino Ratio

ZBRA:

2.39

ASML:

0.23

Omega Ratio

ZBRA:

1.29

ASML:

1.03

Calmar Ratio

ZBRA:

0.82

ASML:

-0.06

Martin Ratio

ZBRA:

10.02

ASML:

-0.12

Ulcer Index

ZBRA:

5.01%

ASML:

20.32%

Daily Std Dev

ZBRA:

30.66%

ASML:

45.02%

Max Drawdown

ZBRA:

-73.42%

ASML:

-90.00%

Current Drawdown

ZBRA:

-36.04%

ASML:

-35.52%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ZBRA:

$20.37B

ASML:

$289.08B

EPS

ZBRA:

$7.36

ASML:

$18.53

PE Ratio

ZBRA:

53.67

ASML:

39.68

PEG Ratio

ZBRA:

0.84

ASML:

1.87

Total Revenue (TTM)

ZBRA:

$4.65B

ASML:

$26.24B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ZBRA:

$2.13B

ASML:

$13.42B

EBITDA (TTM)

ZBRA:

$735.00M

ASML:

$8.87B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZBRA achieves a 43.80% return, which is significantly higher than ASML's -6.02% return. Over the past 10 years, ZBRA has underperformed ASML with an annualized return of 17.55%, while ASML has yielded a comparatively higher 21.77% annualized return.


ZBRA

YTD

43.80%

1M

0.19%

6M

31.01%

1Y

45.89%

5Y*

8.91%

10Y*

17.55%

ASML

YTD

-6.02%

1M

7.18%

6M

-31.64%

1Y

-5.82%

5Y*

20.29%

10Y*

21.77%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ZBRA vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ZBRA, currently valued at 1.64, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.64-0.06
The chart of Sortino ratio for ZBRA, currently valued at 2.39, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.390.23
The chart of Omega ratio for ZBRA, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.291.03
The chart of Calmar ratio for ZBRA, currently valued at 0.82, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.82-0.06
The chart of Martin ratio for ZBRA, currently valued at 10.02, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.0010.02-0.12
ZBRA
ASML

The current ZBRA Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the ASML Sharpe Ratio of -0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZBRA and ASML, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.64
-0.06
ZBRA
ASML

Dividends

ZBRA vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison

ZBRA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
ZBRA
Zebra Technologies Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
0.95%0.85%1.27%0.50%0.59%1.20%1.10%0.75%1.02%0.91%0.77%0.75%

Drawdowns

ZBRA vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZBRA drawdown since its inception was -73.42%, smaller than the maximum ASML drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZBRA and ASML. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-36.04%
-35.52%
ZBRA
ASML

Volatility

ZBRA vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison

Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) have volatilities of 6.83% and 6.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
6.83%
6.61%
ZBRA
ASML

Financials

ZBRA vs. ASML - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Zebra Technologies Corporation and ASML Holding N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab