PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ZAG.TO vs. VOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


ZAG.TOVOO
YTD Return3.81%27.26%
1Y Return10.32%37.86%
3Y Return (Ann)0.00%10.35%
5Y Return (Ann)0.62%16.03%
10Y Return (Ann)2.02%13.45%
Sharpe Ratio1.703.25
Sortino Ratio2.544.31
Omega Ratio1.301.61
Calmar Ratio0.724.74
Martin Ratio5.8921.63
Ulcer Index1.75%1.85%
Daily Std Dev6.07%12.25%
Max Drawdown-18.03%-33.99%
Current Drawdown-5.50%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between ZAG.TO and VOO is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

ZAG.TO vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, ZAG.TO achieves a 3.81% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 27.26% return. Over the past 10 years, ZAG.TO has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 2.02%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.45% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.92%
15.18%
ZAG.TO
VOO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ZAG.TO vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZAG.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


ZAG.TO
BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF
Expense ratio chart for ZAG.TO: current value at 0.09% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.09%
Expense ratio chart for VOO: current value at 0.03% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.03%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ZAG.TO vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZAG.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ZAG.TO, currently valued at 0.92, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.000.92
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ZAG.TO, currently valued at 1.34, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.34
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ZAG.TO, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.17
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ZAG.TO, currently valued at 0.39, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.39
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ZAG.TO, currently valued at 2.03, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.002.03
VOO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VOO, currently valued at 2.89, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.89
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for VOO, currently valued at 3.84, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.84
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for VOO, currently valued at 1.55, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.55
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for VOO, currently valued at 4.13, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.13
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for VOO, currently valued at 18.88, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0018.88

ZAG.TO vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZAG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 3.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZAG.TO and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.92
2.89
ZAG.TO
VOO

Dividends

ZAG.TO vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

ZAG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, more than VOO's 1.23% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
ZAG.TO
BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF
3.44%3.47%3.56%3.04%2.88%3.03%2.92%2.95%3.07%3.13%3.23%3.63%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.23%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%1.85%1.84%

Drawdowns

ZAG.TO vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZAG.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.03%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZAG.TO and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-14.20%
0
ZAG.TO
VOO

Volatility

ZAG.TO vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO) is 2.36%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 3.92%. This indicates that ZAG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.36%
3.92%
ZAG.TO
VOO