ZAG.TO vs. IUSB
Compare and contrast key facts about BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO) and iShares Core Total USD Bond Market ETF (IUSB).
ZAG.TO and IUSB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZAG.TO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the FTSE Canada Universe Bond Index. It was launched on Jan 19, 2010. IUSB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. Universal Index. It was launched on Jun 10, 2014. Both ZAG.TO and IUSB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ZAG.TO or IUSB.
Key characteristics
| ZAG.TO | IUSB | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 3.95% | 2.97% |
| 1Y Return | 10.48% | 9.58% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -0.17% | -1.89% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 0.70% | 0.36% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 2.04% | 1.81% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.55 | 1.57 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.29 | 2.33 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.27 | 1.28 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.66 | 0.61 |
| Martin Ratio | 5.41 | 6.11 |
| Ulcer Index | 1.75% | 1.43% |
| Daily Std Dev | 6.13% | 5.59% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.03% | -17.98% |
| Current Drawdown | -5.36% | -6.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between ZAG.TO and IUSB is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
ZAG.TO vs. IUSB - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ZAG.TO achieves a 3.95% return, which is significantly higher than IUSB's 2.97% return. Over the past 10 years, ZAG.TO has outperformed IUSB with an annualized return of 2.04%, while IUSB has yielded a comparatively lower 1.81% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ZAG.TO vs. IUSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
ZAG.TO has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSB's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ZAG.TO vs. IUSB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO) and iShares Core Total USD Bond Market ETF (IUSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ZAG.TO vs. IUSB - Dividend Comparison
ZAG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, less than IUSB's 3.90% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ZAG.TO BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF | 3.44% | 3.47% | 3.56% | 3.04% | 2.88% | 3.03% | 2.92% | 2.95% | 3.07% | 3.13% | 3.23% | 3.63% |
IUSB iShares Core Total USD Bond Market ETF | 3.90% | 3.46% | 2.53% | 1.74% | 2.45% | 3.04% | 2.98% | 2.56% | 2.60% | 1.95% | 1.39% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ZAG.TO vs. IUSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ZAG.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.03%, roughly equal to the maximum IUSB drawdown of -17.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZAG.TO and IUSB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ZAG.TO vs. IUSB - Volatility Comparison
BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.35% compared to iShares Core Total USD Bond Market ETF (IUSB) at 1.56%. This indicates that ZAG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.