YUMC vs. VRSN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

YUMC (Yum China Holdings, Inc.) and VRSN (VeriSign, Inc.) are both stocks. YUMC operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical), while VRSN operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology). Over the past 5 years, YUMC returned -7.48%/yr vs 6.58%/yr for VRSN. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

YUMC vs. VRSN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) and VeriSign, Inc. (VRSN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YUMC achieves a -8.96% return, which is significantly lower than VRSN's 23.06% return.

YUMC

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: -9.65%
• YTD: -8.96%
• 6M: -7.99%
• 1Y: 1.21%
• 3Y*: -8.17%
• 5Y*: -7.48%
• 10Y*: —

VRSN

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 8.65%
• YTD: 23.06%
• 6M: 19.62%
• 1Y: 9.07%
• 3Y*: 9.94%
• 5Y*: 6.58%
• 10Y*: 13.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YUMC vs. VRSN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
YUMC Yum China Holdings, Inc.	-8.96%	1.18%	15.41%	-21.60%	10.75%	-11.99%	19.48%	44.85%	-15.28%	53.59%
VRSN VeriSign, Inc.	23.06%	18.41%	0.49%	0.25%	-19.06%	17.29%	12.31%	29.93%	29.58%	50.44%

Correlation

The correlation between YUMC and VRSN is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2016	0.24

Over the past year, the correlation between YUMC and VRSN has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.24, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap YUMC : $15.16B VRSN : $27.27B
EPS YUMC : $2.60 VRSN : $9.04
PE Ratio YUMC : 16.49 VRSN : 32.86
PEG Ratio YUMC : 1.10 VRSN : 4.82
PS Ratio YUMC : 1.29 VRSN : 16.41
Total Revenue (TTM) YUMC : $12.09B VRSN : $1.68B
Gross Profit (TTM) YUMC : $1.47B VRSN : $1.49B
EBITDA (TTM) YUMC : $1.71B VRSN : $1.18B

Return for Risk

YUMC vs. VRSN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YUMC

YUMC Risk / Return Rank: 39
YUMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
YUMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
YUMC Omega Ratio Rank: 35
YUMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
YUMC Martin Ratio Rank: 41

VRSN

VRSN Risk / Return Rank: 47
VRSN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
VRSN Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
VRSN Omega Ratio Rank: 46
VRSN Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
VRSN Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YUMC vs. VRSN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) and VeriSign, Inc. (VRSN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	YUMC	VRSN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.05	0.33	-0.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.26	0.63	-0.37
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	1.09	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.05	0.30	-0.25
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.12	0.60	-0.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

YUMC vs. VRSN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YUMC Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the VRSN Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YUMC and VRSN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	YUMC	VRSN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05	0.33	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.20	0.26	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	0.29	-0.10

Drawdowns

YUMC vs. VRSN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YUMC drawdown since its inception was -56.49%, smaller than the maximum VRSN drawdown of -98.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YUMC and VRSN.

Drawdown Indicators

	YUMC	VRSN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.49%	-98.37%	+41.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.89%	-30.21%	+4.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-51.42%	-30.21%	-21.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.45%	-38.85%	-17.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.43%	-4.17%	-29.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.34%	-57.03%	+37.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.97%	15.13%	-5.16%

Volatility

YUMC vs. VRSN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) is 5.45%, while VeriSign, Inc. (VRSN) has a volatility of 8.98%. This indicates that YUMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRSN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	YUMC	VRSN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.45%	8.98%	-3.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.91%	20.58%	-1.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.41%	27.64%	-2.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.20%	25.06%	+12.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.41%	26.20%	+9.21%

Dividends

YUMC vs. VRSN - Dividend Comparison

YUMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, more than VRSN's 1.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VRSN VeriSign, Inc.	1.06%	0.95%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
YUMC Yum China Holdings, Inc.	2.47%	2.01%	1.33%	1.23%	0.88%	0.96%	0.42%	1.00%	1.25%	0.25%

Financials

YUMC vs. VRSN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Yum China Holdings, Inc. and VeriSign, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

YUMC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Yum China Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.27B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

VRSN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, VeriSign, Inc. reported a gross profit of 379.70M and revenue of 428.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.5%.

YUMC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Yum China Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 447.00M and revenue of 3.27B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.7%.

VRSN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, VeriSign, Inc. reported an operating income of 293.60M and revenue of 428.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 68.5%.

YUMC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Yum China Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 309.00M and revenue of 3.27B, resulting in a net margin of 9.5%.

VRSN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, VeriSign, Inc. reported a net income of 214.50M and revenue of 428.90M, resulting in a net margin of 50.0%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YUMC and VRSN in my portfolio?

YUMC and VRSN have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, YUMC or VRSN?

VRSN has higher volatility (8.98%) compared to YUMC (5.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YUMC dropped -56.49% vs VRSN's -98.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VRSN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.33 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.