YUMC vs. VRSN

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) and VeriSign, Inc. (VRSN).

Performance

YUMC vs. VRSN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) and VeriSign, Inc. (VRSN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

YUMC vs. VRSN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
YUMC Yum China Holdings, Inc.	2.75%	1.18%	15.41%	-21.60%	10.75%	-11.99%	19.48%	44.85%	-15.28%	53.59%
VRSN VeriSign, Inc.	2.61%	18.41%	0.49%	0.25%	-19.06%	17.29%	12.31%	29.93%	29.58%	50.44%

Fundamentals

Market Cap YUMC : $17.51B VRSN : $23.00B
EPS YUMC : $2.53 VRSN : $8.84
PE Ratio YUMC : 19.25 VRSN : 28.09
PEG Ratio YUMC : 1.28 VRSN : 4.12
PS Ratio YUMC : 1.52 VRSN : 14.00
Total Revenue (TTM) YUMC : $11.80B VRSN : $1.66B
Gross Profit (TTM) YUMC : $2.17B VRSN : $1.46B
EBITDA (TTM) YUMC : $1.64B VRSN : $1.16B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YUMC achieves a 2.75% return, which is significantly higher than VRSN's 2.61% return.

YUMC

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: -10.67%
• YTD: 2.75%
• 6M: 14.86%
• 1Y: -4.27%
• 3Y*: -6.81%
• 5Y*: -2.45%
• 10Y*: —

VRSN

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 8.96%
• YTD: 2.61%
• 6M: -10.56%
• 1Y: -0.95%
• 3Y*: 5.97%
• 5Y*: 4.49%
• 10Y*: 10.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

YUMC vs. VRSN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YUMC

YUMC Risk / Return Rank: 34
YUMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
YUMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
YUMC Omega Ratio Rank: 30
YUMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
YUMC Martin Ratio Rank: 38

VRSN

VRSN Risk / Return Rank: 38
VRSN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
VRSN Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
VRSN Omega Ratio Rank: 34
VRSN Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
VRSN Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YUMC vs. VRSN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) and VeriSign, Inc. (VRSN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	YUMC	VRSN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.14	-0.03	-0.10
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.03	0.14	-0.11
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.02	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.18	0.01	-0.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.29	0.01	-0.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

YUMC vs. VRSN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YUMC Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the VRSN Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YUMC and VRSN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	YUMC	VRSN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.14	-0.03	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.07	0.18	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.28	-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between YUMC and VRSN is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

YUMC vs. VRSN - Dividend Comparison

YUMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than VRSN's 1.26% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
YUMC Yum China Holdings, Inc.	2.07%	2.01%	1.33%	1.23%	0.88%	0.96%	0.42%	1.00%	1.25%	0.25%
VRSN VeriSign, Inc.	1.26%	0.95%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

YUMC vs. VRSN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YUMC drawdown since its inception was -56.49%, smaller than the maximum VRSN drawdown of -98.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YUMC and VRSN.

Drawdown Indicators

	YUMC	VRSN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.49%	-98.37%	+41.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.35%	-30.21%	+7.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.49%	-38.85%	-17.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.87%	-18.04%	-6.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.19%	-57.33%	+38.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.45%	14.77%	-1.32%

Volatility

YUMC vs. VRSN - Volatility Comparison

Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) has a higher volatility of 7.74% compared to VeriSign, Inc. (VRSN) at 6.83%. This indicates that YUMC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRSN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	YUMC	VRSN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.74%	6.83%	+0.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.95%	18.58%	+0.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.47%	27.34%	+4.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.24%	24.46%	+12.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.62%	25.92%	+9.70%

Financials

YUMC vs. VRSN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Yum China Holdings, Inc. and VeriSign, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

YUMC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Yum China Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 538.00M and revenue of 2.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.1%.

VRSN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, VeriSign, Inc. reported a gross profit of 376.30M and revenue of 425.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.5%.

YUMC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Yum China Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 187.00M and revenue of 2.82B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.6%.

VRSN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, VeriSign, Inc. reported an operating income of 284.80M and revenue of 425.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 67.0%.

YUMC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Yum China Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 140.00M and revenue of 2.82B, resulting in a net margin of 5.0%.

VRSN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, VeriSign, Inc. reported a net income of 206.20M and revenue of 425.30M, resulting in a net margin of 48.5%.