YUMC vs. AI

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) and C3.ai, Inc. (AI).

Performance

YUMC vs. AI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) and C3.ai, Inc. (AI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

YUMC vs. AI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
YUMC Yum China Holdings, Inc.	2.75%	1.18%	15.41%	-21.60%	10.75%	-11.99%	0.58%
AI C3.ai, Inc.	-37.54%	-60.85%	19.92%	156.57%	-64.19%	-77.48%	50.02%

Fundamentals

Market Cap YUMC : $17.51B AI : $1.17B
EPS YUMC : $2.53 AI : -$3.18
PS Ratio YUMC : 1.52 AI : 3.74
PB Ratio YUMC : 3.26 AI : 1.62
Total Revenue (TTM) YUMC : $11.80B AI : $307.39M
Gross Profit (TTM) YUMC : $2.17B AI : $133.57M
EBITDA (TTM) YUMC : $1.64B AI : -$439.66M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YUMC achieves a 2.75% return, which is significantly higher than AI's -37.54% return.

YUMC

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: -10.67%
• YTD: 2.75%
• 6M: 14.86%
• 1Y: -4.27%
• 3Y*: -6.81%
• 5Y*: -2.45%
• 10Y*: —

AI

• 1D: 8.09%
• 1M: 5.91%
• YTD: -37.54%
• 6M: -51.44%
• 1Y: -60.00%
• 3Y*: -36.94%
• 5Y*: -34.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

YUMC vs. AI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YUMC

YUMC Risk / Return Rank: 34
YUMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
YUMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
YUMC Omega Ratio Rank: 30
YUMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
YUMC Martin Ratio Rank: 38

AI

AI Risk / Return Rank: 9
AI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
AI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
AI Omega Ratio Rank: 8
AI Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
AI Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YUMC vs. AI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) and C3.ai, Inc. (AI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	YUMC	AI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.14	-0.87	+0.74
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.03	-1.31	+1.34
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	0.84	+0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.18	-0.84	+0.66
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.29	-1.45	+1.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

YUMC vs. AI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YUMC Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is higher than the AI Sharpe Ratio of -0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YUMC and AI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	YUMC	AI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.14	-0.87	+0.74
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.07	-0.44	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	-0.44	+0.67

Correlation

The correlation between YUMC and AI is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

YUMC vs. AI - Dividend Comparison

YUMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, while AI has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
YUMC Yum China Holdings, Inc.	2.07%	2.01%	1.33%	1.23%	0.88%	0.96%	0.42%	1.00%	1.25%	0.25%
AI C3.ai, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

YUMC vs. AI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YUMC drawdown since its inception was -56.49%, smaller than the maximum AI drawdown of -95.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YUMC and AI.

Drawdown Indicators

	YUMC	AI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.49%	-95.63%	+39.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.35%	-73.39%	+51.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.49%	-89.81%	+33.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.87%	-95.26%	+70.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.19%	-81.49%	+62.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.45%	42.33%	-28.88%

Volatility

YUMC vs. AI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) is 7.74%, while C3.ai, Inc. (AI) has a volatility of 15.60%. This indicates that YUMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	YUMC	AI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.74%	15.60%	-7.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.95%	46.77%	-27.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.47%	69.04%	-37.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.24%	78.46%	-41.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.62%	82.75%	-47.13%

Financials