YUMC vs. AI

In the year-to-date period, YUMC achieves a -4.97% return, which is significantly higher than AI's -34.39% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) and C3.ai, Inc. (AI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current YUMC Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is higher than the AI Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YUMC and AI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

YUMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, while AI has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum YUMC drawdown since its inception was -56.49%, smaller than the maximum AI drawdown of -94.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YUMC and AI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC) is 17.22%, while C3.ai, Inc. (AI) has a volatility of 23.22%. This indicates that YUMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Yum China Holdings, Inc. and C3.ai, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.