YOLO vs. SMCI
YOLO (AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF) is Cannabis fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while SMCI (Super Micro Computer, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, YOLO returned -31.98%/yr vs 49.49%/yr for SMCI. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
YOLO vs. SMCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, YOLO achieves a -23.04% return, which is significantly lower than SMCI's -2.97% return.
YOLO
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- -13.02%
- 6M
- -12.42%
- YTD
- -23.04%
- 1Y
- 14.01%
- 3Y*
- -1.05%
- 5Y*
- -31.98%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -25.59%
SMCI
- 1D
- 2.42%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- 6M
- -2.44%
- YTD
- -2.97%
- 1Y
- -49.86%
- 3Y*
- -5.60%
- 5Y*
- 49.49%
- 10Y*
- 29.71%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.63B | $1.22B | $1.80B | |
| $65.57K | $75.89K | $99.07K |
YOLO vs. SMCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
YOLO AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF | -23.04% | 36.36% | -17.81% | -15.10% | -72.21% | -20.48% | 47.17% | -51.27% |
SMCI Super Micro Computer, Inc. | -2.97% | -3.97% | 7.23% | 246.24% | 86.80% | 38.82% | 31.81% | 8.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between YOLO and SMCI is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2019 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
YOLO vs. SMCI — Risk / Return Rank
YOLO
SMCI
YOLO vs. SMCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO) and Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| YOLO | SMCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 0.94 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.44 | -0.80 | +1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.70 | -1.24 | +1.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
YOLO vs. SMCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum YOLO drawdown since its inception was -94.68%, which is greater than SMCI's maximum drawdown of -84.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YOLO and SMCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| YOLO | SMCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.68% | -84.84% | -9.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.57% | -65.01% | +23.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.45% | -84.84% | +18.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.67% | -84.84% | -6.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -84.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.00% | -76.10% | -14.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.37% | -32.28% | -37.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.76% | 42.29% | -16.53% |
Volatility
YOLO vs. SMCI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF (YOLO) is 13.99%, while Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI) has a volatility of 27.83%. This indicates that YOLO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| YOLO | SMCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.99% | 27.83% | -13.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.12% | 82.17% | -43.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.11% | 89.74% | -14.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.97% | 88.01% | -34.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.23% | 71.49% | -20.26% |
Dividends
YOLO vs. SMCI - Dividend Comparison
Neither YOLO nor SMCI has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMCI Super Micro Computer, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YOLO AdvisorShares Pure Cannabis ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.57% | 1.17% | 0.55% | 3.93% | 2.03% | 4.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
YOLO and SMCI have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMCI has higher volatility (27.83%) compared to YOLO (13.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YOLO dropped -94.68% vs SMCI's -84.84%.
YOLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.24 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for YOLO and SMCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer