PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YMAG vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YMAG vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YMAG achieves a 2.13% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 22.47% return.


YMAG

1D
2.67%
1M
3.68%
6M
1.85%
YTD
2.13%
1Y
17.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.55%

VGT

1D
1.76%
1M
0.44%
6M
22.59%
YTD
22.47%
1Y
37.19%
3Y*
29.10%
5Y*
18.09%
10Y*
24.01%
ALL TIME*
14.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$454.00M$507.98M$575.23M
$11.59M$13.01M$15.33M

YMAG vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
YMAG
YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs
2.13%18.64%34.66%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
22.47%21.77%22.89%

Correlation

The correlation between YMAG and VGT is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024

0.79

The correlation between YMAG and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

YMAG vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
YMAG
VGT

Financial Services

99.0%
0.5%

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Communication Services

-

0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.3%

Healthcare

-

0.0%

Industrials

-

0.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

98.6%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

YMAG
99.0%
VGT
0.5%

Basic Materials

YMAG

-

VGT
0.0%

Communication Services

YMAG

-

VGT
0.5%

Consumer Cyclical

YMAG

-

VGT
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

YMAG

-

VGT

-

Energy

YMAG

-

VGT
0.3%

Healthcare

YMAG

-

VGT
0.0%

Industrials

YMAG

-

VGT
0.4%

Real Estate

YMAG

-

VGT

-

Technology

YMAG

-

VGT
98.6%

Utilities

YMAG

-

VGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YMAG vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

YMAG
YMAG Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
YMAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YMAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
YMAG Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
YMAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
YMAG Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

YMAG vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YMAGVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.26

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

2.28

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.43

6.12

-2.69

YMAG vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YMAG Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YMAG and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YMAG vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YMAG drawdown since its inception was -25.96%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YMAG and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YMAGVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.96%

-54.63%

+28.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.38%

-16.40%

+2.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.28%

-8.34%

+4.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.68%

-7.95%

+3.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.03%

6.09%

-1.06%

Volatility

YMAG vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) is 7.70%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 8.34%. This indicates that YMAG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YMAGVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.70%

8.34%

-0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.70%

20.11%

-5.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.39%

24.25%

-5.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.21%

25.85%

-4.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.21%

24.90%

-3.69%

YMAG vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

YMAG has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

YMAG vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

YMAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 50.58%, more than VGT's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.38%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%
YMAG
YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs
50.58%52.27%35.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


YMAG and VGT have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (8.34%) compared to YMAG (7.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YMAG dropped -25.96% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 1-year performance, VGT leads with 37.19% vs 17.23% for YMAG. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, YMAG has been the lower-risk option at 7.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VGT has performed better with a 37.19% return vs 17.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAG.

YMAG has the higher dividend yield at 50.58%, compared with 0.38% for VGT.

YMAG is categorized as Derivative Income, while VGT is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.28% for YMAG and 0.09% for VGT.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YMAG and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer