PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YMAG vs. APLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YMAG vs. APLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) and YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YMAG achieves a 3.80% return, which is significantly lower than APLY's 9.41% return.


YMAG

1D
-0.86%
1M
2.07%
YTD
3.80%
6M
4.38%
1Y
27.02%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

APLY

1D
-0.93%
1M
9.06%
YTD
9.41%
6M
5.60%
1Y
36.14%
3Y*
11.75%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YMAG vs. APLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between YMAG and APLY is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2024

0.49

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YMAG vs. APLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YMAG
YMAG Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
YMAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YMAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
YMAG Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
YMAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
YMAG Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

APLY
APLY Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
APLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
APLY Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
APLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
APLY Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YMAG vs. APLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) and YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YMAGAPLYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.37

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

3.09

-1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.63

7.87

-1.24

YMAG vs. APLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YMAG Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the APLY Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YMAG and APLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YMAGAPLYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

2.02

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.19

0.68

+0.51

Drawdowns

YMAG vs. APLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YMAG drawdown since its inception was -25.96%, smaller than the maximum APLY drawdown of -30.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YMAG and APLY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YMAGAPLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.96%

-30.41%

+4.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.38%

-11.76%

-2.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.71%

-0.93%

-1.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.52%

-6.93%

+2.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.08%

4.60%

-0.52%

Volatility

YMAG vs. APLY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs (YMAG) is 3.67%, while YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF (APLY) has a volatility of 4.12%. This indicates that YMAG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YMAGAPLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

4.12%

-0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.52%

13.03%

-1.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.19%

17.99%

-1.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.88%

20.97%

-0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.88%

20.97%

-0.09%

YMAG vs. APLY - Expense Ratio Comparison

YMAG has a 1.28% expense ratio, which is higher than APLY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

YMAG vs. APLY - Dividend Comparison

YMAG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 52.16%, more than APLY's 34.76% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
APLY
YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF
34.76%36.38%24.95%14.36%
YMAG
YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs
52.16%52.27%35.22%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


YMAG and APLY have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

APLY has higher volatility (4.12%) compared to YMAG (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YMAG dropped -25.96% vs APLY's -30.41%.

On 1-year performance, APLY leads with 36.14% vs 27.02% for YMAG. On fees, APLY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, YMAG has been the lower-risk option at 3.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, APLY has performed better with a 36.14% return vs 27.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

APLY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.28% for YMAG.

YMAG has the higher dividend yield at 52.16%, compared with 34.76% for APLY.

YMAG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while APLY is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 1.28% for YMAG and 0.99% for APLY.

APLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YMAG and APLY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer