PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YLDE vs. CALF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

YLDE vs. CALF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ClearBridge Dividend Strategy ESG ETF (YLDE) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF (CALF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YLDE achieves a 9.35% return, which is significantly lower than CALF's 22.50% return.


YLDE

1D
0.07%
1M
1.44%
6M
6.07%
YTD
9.35%
1Y
18.10%
3Y*
14.32%
5Y*
10.45%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.09%

CALF

1D
-0.40%
1M
4.89%
6M
19.77%
YTD
22.50%
1Y
39.59%
3Y*
8.57%
5Y*
6.29%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$20.38M$24.48M$25.33M
$703.80K$730.06K$767.23K

YLDE vs. CALF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
YLDE
ClearBridge Dividend Strategy ESG ETF
9.35%13.09%16.44%15.69%-8.56%22.12%10.35%32.46%-5.74%9.35%
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF
22.50%2.33%-7.41%35.43%-15.20%40.68%16.55%18.18%-10.06%5.78%

Correlation

The correlation between YLDE and CALF is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2017

0.57

The correlation between YLDE and CALF shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

YLDE vs. CALF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

YLDE
YLDE Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
YLDE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YLDE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
YLDE Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
YLDE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
YLDE Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

CALF
CALF Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
CALF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CALF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CALF Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
CALF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CALF Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

YLDE vs. CALF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ClearBridge Dividend Strategy ESG ETF (YLDE) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF (CALF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


YLDECALFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.40

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

6.13

-3.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.45

17.68

-9.23

YLDE vs. CALF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YLDE Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the CALF Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YLDE and CALF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

YLDE vs. CALF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YLDE drawdown since its inception was -33.23%, smaller than the maximum CALF drawdown of -47.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YLDE and CALF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


YLDECALFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.23%

-47.58%

+14.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.59%

-6.02%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.42%

-34.22%

+22.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.22%

-34.22%

+14.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.90%

-1.88%

+0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.51%

-10.57%

+7.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

2.09%

-0.02%

Volatility

YLDE vs. CALF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ClearBridge Dividend Strategy ESG ETF (YLDE) is 3.36%, while Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF (CALF) has a volatility of 5.09%. This indicates that YLDE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CALF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


YLDECALFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.36%

5.09%

-1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.12%

11.64%

-4.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.52%

16.13%

-6.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.54%

23.23%

-9.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.68%

25.89%

-10.21%

YLDE vs. CALF - Expense Ratio Comparison

YLDE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than CALF's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

YLDE vs. CALF - Dividend Comparison

YLDE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.39%, more than CALF's 1.12% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF
1.12%1.43%1.07%1.18%0.85%2.63%0.82%0.99%1.39%0.70%
YLDE
ClearBridge Dividend Strategy ESG ETF
5.93%5.68%1.69%1.64%1.68%1.15%1.46%1.65%2.25%1.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


YLDE and CALF have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CALF has higher volatility (5.09%) compared to YLDE (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YLDE dropped -33.23% vs CALF's -47.58%.

On 5-year performance, YLDE leads with 10.45% vs 6.29% for CALF. On fees, CALF is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, YLDE has been the lower-risk option at 3.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, YLDE has performed better with a 10.45% return vs 6.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CALF is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for YLDE.

YLDE has the higher dividend yield at 5.93%, compared with 1.12% for CALF.

YLDE is categorized as Dividend, while CALF is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for YLDE and 0.59% for CALF.

CALF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for YLDE and CALF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer