YBIT vs. SCHG

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

YBIT (YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - YBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by YieldMax, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. YBIT is actively managed, while SCHG is passively managed. Over the past year, YBIT returned -41.67% vs 15.45% for SCHG. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. YBIT charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

YBIT vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF (YBIT) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YBIT achieves a -25.67% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 5.02% return.

YBIT

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: 1.13%
• 6M: -30.01%
• YTD: -25.67%
• 1Y: -41.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCHG

• 1D: -1.30%
• 1M: 2.26%
• 6M: 5.86%
• YTD: 5.02%
• 1Y: 15.45%
• 3Y*: 21.11%
• 5Y*: 13.54%
• 10Y*: 18.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

YBIT vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
YBIT YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF	-25.67%	-2.49%	1.40%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	5.02%	17.50%	27.28%

Correlation

The correlation between YBIT and SCHG is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2024	0.48

Return for Risk

YBIT vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YBIT

YBIT Risk / Return Rank: 1
YBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
YBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
YBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 1
YBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
YBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 1

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 29
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 29
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YBIT vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF (YBIT) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	YBIT	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.13	0.95	-2.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.67	1.36	-3.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.81	1.17	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.88	0.95	-1.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.43	3.03	-4.46

YBIT vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YBIT Sharpe Ratio is -1.13, which is lower than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YBIT and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

YBIT vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YBIT drawdown since its inception was -47.46%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBIT and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	YBIT	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.46%	-34.59%	-12.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.46%	-16.41%	-31.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-23.39%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.59%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.92%	-3.07%	-40.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.69%	-5.19%	-11.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.16%	5.12%	+24.04%

Volatility

YBIT vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF (YBIT) has a higher volatility of 8.40% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 4.74%. This indicates that YBIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	YBIT	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.40%	4.74%	+3.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.30%	12.82%	+16.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.92%	16.40%	+20.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	38.40%	22.41%	+15.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.40%	21.57%	+16.83%

YBIT vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

YBIT has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

YBIT vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

YBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 95.62%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.38%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%
YBIT YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF	95.62%	88.33%	60.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both YBIT and SCHG in my portfolio?

YBIT and SCHG have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, YBIT or SCHG?

YBIT has higher volatility (8.40%) compared to SCHG (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, YBIT dropped -47.46% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which ETF is better, YBIT or SCHG?

On 1-year performance, SCHG leads with 15.45% vs -41.67% for YBIT. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHG has been the lower-risk option at 4.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, YBIT or SCHG?

Over the 1-year period, SCHG has performed better with a 15.45% return vs -41.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, YBIT or SCHG?

SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for YBIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, YBIT or SCHG?

YBIT has the higher dividend yield at 95.62%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.

What is the main difference between YBIT and SCHG?

YBIT is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for YBIT and 0.04% for SCHG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs -1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.