PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
YBIT vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

YBIT vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF (YBIT) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

YBIT vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
YBIT
YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF
-19.58%-2.49%-0.09%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
-9.73%17.50%25.14%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, YBIT achieves a -19.58% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's -9.73% return.


YBIT

1D
0.51%
1M
0.83%
YTD
-19.58%
6M
-36.73%
1Y
-16.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCHG

1D
0.96%
1M
-4.46%
YTD
-9.73%
6M
-8.15%
1Y
17.00%
3Y*
22.30%
5Y*
12.76%
10Y*
16.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


YBIT vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

YBIT has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

YBIT vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

YBIT
YBIT Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
YBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
YBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
YBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
YBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

YBIT vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF (YBIT) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


YBITSCHGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.45

0.76

-1.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.41

1.24

-1.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.17

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.33

1.09

-1.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.74

3.71

-4.45

YBIT vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current YBIT Sharpe Ratio is -0.45, which is lower than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of YBIT and SCHG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


YBITSCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.45

0.76

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.30

0.79

-1.09

Correlation

The correlation between YBIT and SCHG is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

YBIT vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

YBIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 103.05%, more than SCHG's 0.43% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
YBIT
YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF
103.05%88.33%60.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.43%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Drawdowns

YBIT vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum YBIT drawdown since its inception was -45.54%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for YBIT and SCHG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


YBITSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.54%

-34.59%

-10.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.54%

-16.41%

-29.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.32%

-12.51%

-26.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.34%

-5.22%

-8.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.97%

4.84%

+15.13%

Volatility

YBIT vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF (YBIT) has a higher volatility of 9.45% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 6.77%. This indicates that YBIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


YBITSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.45%

6.77%

+2.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.43%

12.54%

+18.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.31%

22.45%

+14.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.60%

22.31%

+17.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.60%

21.51%

+18.09%