XYLG vs. RYLD
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD).
XYLG and RYLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XYLG is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE S&P 500 BuyWrite Index. It was launched on Sep 18, 2020. RYLD is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the CBOE Russell 2000 BuyWrite Index. It was launched on Apr 17, 2019. Both XYLG and RYLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XYLG or RYLD.
Correlation
The correlation between XYLG and RYLD is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XYLG vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
XYLG:
2.51
RYLD:
1.06
XYLG:
3.40
RYLD:
1.51
XYLG:
1.51
RYLD:
1.22
XYLG:
3.29
RYLD:
0.63
XYLG:
17.11
RYLD:
6.47
XYLG:
1.38%
RYLD:
1.73%
XYLG:
9.37%
RYLD:
10.52%
XYLG:
-21.30%
RYLD:
-41.52%
XYLG:
-0.97%
RYLD:
-7.16%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XYLG achieves a 22.30% return, which is significantly higher than RYLD's 9.56% return.
XYLG
22.30%
0.91%
10.01%
22.58%
N/A
N/A
RYLD
9.56%
-0.00%
8.74%
10.25%
3.04%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XYLG vs. RYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XYLG and RYLD have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XYLG vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XYLG vs. RYLD - Dividend Comparison
XYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, less than RYLD's 11.98% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XYLG Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF | 4.42% | 5.38% | 6.44% | 7.41% | 1.39% | 0.00% |
RYLD Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF | 11.98% | 12.65% | 13.50% | 12.35% | 10.77% | 6.44% |
Drawdowns
XYLG vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XYLG drawdown since its inception was -21.30%, smaller than the maximum RYLD drawdown of -41.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLG and RYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XYLG vs. RYLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) is 2.45%, while Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) has a volatility of 3.56%. This indicates that XYLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.