PortfoliosLab logo
XYLG vs. RYLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between XYLG and RYLD is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.8

Performance

XYLG vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
57.47%
23.35%
XYLG
RYLD

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

XYLG:

0.56

RYLD:

0.05

Sortino Ratio

XYLG:

0.90

RYLD:

0.19

Omega Ratio

XYLG:

1.14

RYLD:

1.03

Calmar Ratio

XYLG:

0.56

RYLD:

0.04

Martin Ratio

XYLG:

2.49

RYLD:

0.18

Ulcer Index

XYLG:

3.92%

RYLD:

4.41%

Daily Std Dev

XYLG:

17.50%

RYLD:

17.17%

Max Drawdown

XYLG:

-21.30%

RYLD:

-41.53%

Current Drawdown

XYLG:

-9.67%

RYLD:

-13.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XYLG achieves a -6.11% return, which is significantly higher than RYLD's -7.72% return.


XYLG

YTD

-6.11%

1M

-4.33%

6M

-3.31%

1Y

8.71%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

RYLD

YTD

-7.72%

1M

-4.88%

6M

-4.32%

1Y

0.01%

5Y*

8.42%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XYLG vs. RYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XYLG and RYLD have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Expense ratio chart for XYLG: current value is 0.60%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
XYLG: 0.60%
Expense ratio chart for RYLD: current value is 0.60%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
RYLD: 0.60%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

XYLG vs. RYLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XYLG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XYLG is 6666
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XYLG is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XYLG is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XYLG is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XYLG is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XYLG is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

RYLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RYLD is 2727
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RYLD is 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RYLD is 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RYLD is 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RYLD is 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RYLD is 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

XYLG vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for XYLG, currently valued at 0.56, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
XYLG: 0.56
RYLD: 0.05
The chart of Sortino ratio for XYLG, currently valued at 0.90, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
XYLG: 0.90
RYLD: 0.19
The chart of Omega ratio for XYLG, currently valued at 1.14, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
XYLG: 1.14
RYLD: 1.03
The chart of Calmar ratio for XYLG, currently valued at 0.56, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
XYLG: 0.56
RYLD: 0.04
The chart of Martin ratio for XYLG, currently valued at 2.49, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
XYLG: 2.49
RYLD: 0.18

The current XYLG Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is higher than the RYLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XYLG and RYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.56
0.05
XYLG
RYLD

Dividends

XYLG vs. RYLD - Dividend Comparison

XYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.21%, more than RYLD's 13.36% yield.


TTM202420232022202120202019
XYLG
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF
26.21%23.65%4.90%6.44%7.40%1.39%0.00%
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
13.36%12.03%12.64%13.49%12.35%10.76%6.43%

Drawdowns

XYLG vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYLG drawdown since its inception was -21.30%, smaller than the maximum RYLD drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLG and RYLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-9.67%
-13.90%
XYLG
RYLD

Volatility

XYLG vs. RYLD - Volatility Comparison

Global X S&P 500 Covered Call & Growth ETF (XYLG) has a higher volatility of 13.71% compared to Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) at 12.57%. This indicates that XYLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
13.71%
12.57%
XYLG
RYLD