PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XYLD vs. HDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XYLD vs. HDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XYLD achieves a 4.96% return, which is significantly lower than HDV's 12.69% return. Over the past 10 years, XYLD has underperformed HDV with an annualized return of 8.25%, while HDV has yielded a comparatively higher 9.26% annualized return.


XYLD

1D
-0.15%
1M
2.00%
YTD
4.96%
6M
6.48%
1Y
17.66%
3Y*
11.27%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
8.25%

HDV

1D
0.37%
1M
0.29%
YTD
12.69%
6M
12.16%
1Y
20.35%
3Y*
14.94%
5Y*
10.32%
10Y*
9.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XYLD vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
4.96%8.02%19.49%11.10%-12.05%19.59%-0.56%21.41%-6.09%16.49%
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
12.69%11.90%14.16%1.72%7.05%19.45%-6.48%20.22%-3.01%13.40%

Correlation

The correlation between XYLD and HDV is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2013

0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between XYLD and HDV has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XYLD vs. HDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XYLD
HDV

Technology

35.6%
8.2%

Financial Services

11.8%
11.1%

Communication Services

11.2%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
6.1%

Healthcare

8.5%
16.5%

Industrials

8.3%
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
24.1%

Energy

3.5%
22.3%

Utilities

2.3%
9.2%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.2%

Technology

XYLD
35.6%
HDV
8.2%

Financial Services

XYLD
11.8%
HDV
11.1%

Communication Services

XYLD
11.2%
HDV
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

XYLD
10.2%
HDV
6.1%

Healthcare

XYLD
8.5%
HDV
16.5%

Industrials

XYLD
8.3%
HDV
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

XYLD
4.9%
HDV
24.1%

Energy

XYLD
3.5%
HDV
22.3%

Utilities

XYLD
2.3%
HDV
9.2%

Real Estate

XYLD
1.9%
HDV

-

Basic Materials

XYLD
1.8%
HDV
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XYLD vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XYLD
XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

HDV
HDV Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
HDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDV Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
HDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDV Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XYLD vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XYLDHDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.36

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

3.95

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.84

11.02

+6.83

XYLD vs. HDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XYLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is comparable to the HDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XYLD and HDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XYLDHDVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71

2.10

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.81

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.59

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.72

-0.12

Drawdowns

XYLD vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XYLD drawdown since its inception was -33.46%, smaller than the maximum HDV drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLD and HDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XYLDHDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.46%

-37.04%

+3.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.29%

-5.18%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.53%

-10.49%

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.66%

-15.42%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.46%

-37.04%

+3.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-2.54%

+2.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-3.09%

-0.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

1.85%

-0.86%

Volatility

XYLD vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) is 0.88%, while iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that XYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XYLDHDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.88%

3.19%

-2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.37%

7.56%

-2.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.55%

9.73%

-3.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.22%

12.82%

-1.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.21%

15.73%

-1.52%

XYLD vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

XYLD vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison

XYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.52%, more than HDV's 2.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HDV
iShares Core High Dividend ETF
2.91%3.22%3.67%3.82%3.56%3.47%4.07%3.27%3.67%3.27%3.28%3.92%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
10.52%10.51%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.76%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


XYLD and HDV have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HDV has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to XYLD (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XYLD dropped -33.46% vs HDV's -37.04%.

On 10-year performance, HDV leads with 9.26% vs 8.25% for XYLD. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XYLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HDV has performed better with a 9.26% return vs 8.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XYLD.

XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.52%, compared with 2.91% for HDV.

XYLD is categorized as Derivative Income, while HDV is Dividend. XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index, while HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XYLD and 0.08% for HDV.

XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XYLD and HDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer