XYLD vs. HDV
XYLD (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) and HDV (iShares Core High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XYLD is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index, while HDV is a Dividend fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XYLD returned 8.25%/yr vs 9.26%/yr for HDV. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XYLD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for HDV.
Performance
XYLD vs. HDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XYLD achieves a 4.96% return, which is significantly lower than HDV's 12.69% return. Over the past 10 years, XYLD has underperformed HDV with an annualized return of 8.25%, while HDV has yielded a comparatively higher 9.26% annualized return.
XYLD
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 2.00%
- YTD
- 4.96%
- 6M
- 6.48%
- 1Y
- 17.66%
- 3Y*
- 11.27%
- 5Y*
- 7.72%
- 10Y*
- 8.25%
HDV
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 12.69%
- 6M
- 12.16%
- 1Y
- 20.35%
- 3Y*
- 14.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.32%
- 10Y*
- 9.26%
XYLD vs. HDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 4.96% | 8.02% | 19.49% | 11.10% | -12.05% | 19.59% | -0.56% | 21.41% | -6.09% | 16.49% |
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 12.69% | 11.90% | 14.16% | 1.72% | 7.05% | 19.45% | -6.48% | 20.22% | -3.01% | 13.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between XYLD and HDV is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2013 | 0.58 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XYLD and HDV has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XYLD vs. HDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XYLD
HDV
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
XYLD
HDV
Financial Services
XYLD
HDV
Communication Services
XYLD
HDV
Consumer Cyclical
XYLD
HDV
Healthcare
XYLD
HDV
Industrials
XYLD
HDV
Consumer Defensive
XYLD
HDV
Energy
XYLD
HDV
Utilities
XYLD
HDV
Real Estate
XYLD
HDV
-
Basic Materials
XYLD
HDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XYLD vs. HDV — Risk / Return Rank
XYLD
HDV
XYLD vs. HDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) and iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XYLD | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 1.36 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | 3.95 | -0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.84 | 11.02 | +6.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XYLD | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | 2.10 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.81 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.59 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.72 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
XYLD vs. HDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XYLD drawdown since its inception was -33.46%, smaller than the maximum HDV drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XYLD and HDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XYLD | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.46% | -37.04% | +3.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.29% | -5.18% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.53% | -10.49% | -5.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.66% | -15.42% | -3.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.46% | -37.04% | +3.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -2.54% | +2.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -3.09% | -0.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 1.85% | -0.86% |
Volatility
XYLD vs. HDV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) is 0.88%, while iShares Core High Dividend ETF (HDV) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that XYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XYLD | HDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.88% | 3.19% | -2.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.37% | 7.56% | -2.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.55% | 9.73% | -3.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.22% | 12.82% | -1.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.21% | 15.73% | -1.52% |
XYLD vs. HDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XYLD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than HDV's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
XYLD vs. HDV - Dividend Comparison
XYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.52%, more than HDV's 2.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDV iShares Core High Dividend ETF | 2.91% | 3.22% | 3.67% | 3.82% | 3.56% | 3.47% | 4.07% | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 3.92% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 10.52% | 10.51% | 11.54% | 10.51% | 13.43% | 9.07% | 7.93% | 5.76% | 7.12% | 5.18% | 3.23% | 4.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XYLD and HDV have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HDV has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to XYLD (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XYLD dropped -33.46% vs HDV's -37.04%.
On 10-year performance, HDV leads with 9.26% vs 8.25% for XYLD. On fees, HDV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XYLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, HDV has performed better with a 9.26% return vs 8.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XYLD.
XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.52%, compared with 2.91% for HDV.
XYLD is categorized as Derivative Income, while HDV is Dividend. XYLD tracks Cboe S&P 500 BuyWrite Index, while HDV tracks Morningstar Dividend Yield Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XYLD and 0.08% for HDV.
XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XYLD and HDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer