PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
XXXX vs. USSC.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


XXXXUSSC.L
YTD Return49.10%5.48%
Daily Std Dev160.40%20.89%
Max Drawdown-31.99%-48.99%
Current Drawdown-10.30%-2.50%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between XXXX and USSC.L is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

XXXX vs. USSC.L - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, XXXX achieves a 49.10% return, which is significantly higher than USSC.L's 5.48% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
15.49%
8.02%
XXXX
USSC.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XXXX vs. USSC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XXXX has a 2.95% expense ratio, which is higher than USSC.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


XXXX
MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN
Expense ratio chart for XXXX: current value at 2.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%2.95%
Expense ratio chart for USSC.L: current value at 0.30% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.30%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

XXXX vs. USSC.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) and SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XXXX
Sharpe ratio
No data
USSC.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for USSC.L, currently valued at 0.98, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.98
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for USSC.L, currently valued at 1.58, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.58
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for USSC.L, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.003.501.19
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for USSC.L, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.26
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for USSC.L, currently valued at 4.72, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.004.72

XXXX vs. USSC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

XXXX vs. USSC.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XXXX nor USSC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

XXXX vs. USSC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XXXX drawdown since its inception was -31.99%, smaller than the maximum USSC.L drawdown of -48.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXXX and USSC.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-10.30%
-2.50%
XXXX
USSC.L

Volatility

XXXX vs. USSC.L - Volatility Comparison

MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) has a higher volatility of 15.80% compared to SPDR MSCI USA Small Cap Value Weighted UCITS ETF (USSC.L) at 6.07%. This indicates that XXXX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USSC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
15.80%
6.07%
XXXX
USSC.L