XXXX vs. UPRO
XXXX (MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN) and UPRO (ProShares UltraPro S&P 500) are both Leveraged Equities funds tracking the S&P 500, from Max and ProShares respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XXXX returned 90.17% vs 83.10% for UPRO. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XXXX charges 2.95%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for UPRO.
Performance
XXXX vs. UPRO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XXXX achieves a 31.29% return, which is significantly higher than UPRO's 29.29% return.
XXXX
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- 16.66%
- YTD
- 31.29%
- 6M
- 27.73%
- 1Y
- 90.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UPRO
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 13.26%
- YTD
- 29.29%
- 6M
- 27.72%
- 1Y
- 83.10%
- 3Y*
- 53.48%
- 5Y*
- 23.40%
- 10Y*
- 30.04%
XXXX vs. UPRO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XXXX MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN | 31.29% | 17.36% | 61.36% | 16.31% |
UPRO ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 | 29.29% | 31.88% | 63.57% | 12.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between XXXX and UPRO is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2023 | 1.00 |
The correlation between XXXX and UPRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XXXX vs. UPRO — Risk / Return Rank
XXXX
UPRO
XXXX vs. UPRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) and ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XXXX | UPRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.37 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | 3.12 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.30 | 13.16 | -3.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XXXX | UPRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.94 | 2.37 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.65 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
XXXX vs. UPRO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XXXX drawdown since its inception was -62.27%, smaller than the maximum UPRO drawdown of -76.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XXXX and UPRO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XXXX | UPRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.27% | -76.82% | +14.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.25% | -26.78% | -10.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -48.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -63.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -76.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.40% | -1.02% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.59% | -14.41% | +2.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.73% | 6.33% | +3.40% |
Volatility
XXXX vs. UPRO - Volatility Comparison
MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN (XXXX) has a higher volatility of 11.10% compared to ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 (UPRO) at 8.29%. This indicates that XXXX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UPRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XXXX | UPRO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.10% | 8.29% | +2.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.43% | 26.61% | +8.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.80% | 35.33% | +11.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.71% | 50.31% | +10.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.71% | 53.73% | +6.98% |
XXXX vs. UPRO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XXXX has a 2.95% expense ratio, which is higher than UPRO's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
XXXX vs. UPRO - Dividend Comparison
XXXX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UPRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UPRO ProShares UltraPro S&P 500 | 0.67% | 0.84% | 0.93% | 0.74% | 0.52% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.41% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 0.34% |
XXXX MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, XXXX and UPRO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
XXXX has higher volatility (11.10%) compared to UPRO (8.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XXXX dropped -62.27% vs UPRO's -76.82%.
On 1-year performance, XXXX leads with 90.17% vs 83.10% for UPRO. On fees, UPRO is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, UPRO has been the lower-risk option at 8.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XXXX has performed better with a 90.17% return vs 83.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UPRO is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 2.95% for XXXX.
UPRO has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.00% for XXXX.
Both ETFs track S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Max and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 2.95% for XXXX and 0.89% for UPRO.
UPRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XXXX and UPRO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer