PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XVV vs. MOAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XVV vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Screened S&P 500 ETF (XVV) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XVV achieves a 9.37% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's -0.94% return.


XVV

1D
-0.86%
1M
4.81%
YTD
9.37%
6M
9.29%
1Y
26.65%
3Y*
22.30%
5Y*
13.55%
10Y*

MOAT

1D
-1.37%
1M
3.30%
YTD
-0.94%
6M
-0.69%
1Y
14.97%
3Y*
11.34%
5Y*
8.01%
10Y*
13.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XVV vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XVV
iShares ESG Screened S&P 500 ETF
9.37%17.53%25.87%29.78%-21.46%29.19%16.13%
MOAT
VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
-0.94%13.20%10.73%31.89%-13.66%24.12%18.41%

Correlation

The correlation between XVV and MOAT is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2020

0.84

The correlation between XVV and MOAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XVV vs. MOAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XVV
MOAT

Technology

37.5%
32.8%

Financial Services

13.2%
6.7%

Communication Services

12.5%
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

11.2%
10.3%

Healthcare

8.5%
16.0%

Industrials

6.8%
13.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
17.5%

Real Estate

2.1%
0.8%

Basic Materials

2.0%

-

Utilities

1.3%

-

Energy

1.2%

-

Technology

XVV
37.5%
MOAT
32.8%

Financial Services

XVV
13.2%
MOAT
6.7%

Communication Services

XVV
12.5%
MOAT
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XVV
11.2%
MOAT
10.3%

Healthcare

XVV
8.5%
MOAT
16.0%

Industrials

XVV
6.8%
MOAT
13.5%

Consumer Defensive

XVV
3.7%
MOAT
17.5%

Real Estate

XVV
2.1%
MOAT
0.8%

Basic Materials

XVV
2.0%
MOAT

-

Utilities

XVV
1.3%
MOAT

-

Energy

XVV
1.2%
MOAT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XVV vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XVV
XVV Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
XVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
XVV Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
XVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
XVV Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

MOAT
MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XVV vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Screened S&P 500 ETF (XVV) and VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XVVMOATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.19

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

1.21

+1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.18

3.77

+7.41

XVV vs. MOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XVV Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is higher than the MOAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XVV and MOAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XVVMOATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

1.09

+1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.44

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

0.77

+0.23

Drawdowns

XVV vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XVV drawdown since its inception was -27.20%, smaller than the maximum MOAT drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XVV and MOAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XVVMOATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.20%

-33.31%

+6.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.59%

-12.43%

+1.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.59%

-21.44%

+1.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.20%

-23.96%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

-4.72%

+3.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.88%

-3.83%

-2.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.39%

3.98%

-1.59%

Volatility

XVV vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Screened S&P 500 ETF (XVV) is 3.09%, while VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) has a volatility of 3.82%. This indicates that XVV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XVVMOATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.09%

3.82%

-0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.62%

9.87%

-0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.68%

13.86%

-1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.61%

18.18%

-0.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.35%

18.68%

-1.33%

XVV vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XVV has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than MOAT's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

XVV vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison

XVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than MOAT's 1.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOAT
VanEck Vectors Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
1.37%1.36%1.37%0.86%1.25%1.08%1.46%1.31%1.79%1.07%1.17%2.13%
XVV
iShares ESG Screened S&P 500 ETF
0.88%0.94%1.05%1.25%1.57%0.81%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XVV and MOAT have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOAT has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to XVV (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XVV dropped -27.20% vs MOAT's -33.31%.

On 5-year performance, XVV leads with 13.55% vs 8.01% for MOAT. On fees, XVV is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XVV has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XVV has performed better with a 13.55% return vs 8.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XVV is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for MOAT.

MOAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.88% for XVV.

XVV is categorized as S&P 500, while MOAT is Large Cap Blend Equities. XVV tracks S&P 500 Sustainablility Screened Index, while MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XVV and 0.48% for MOAT.

XVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XVV and MOAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer